Comparison of total versus partial laparoscopic fundoplication in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: A comparison of total vs, partial laparoscopic fundoplication was conducted in 89 patients from July 92 to June 96. Parameters examined were operating room (OR) times, conversion rates, and perioperative complications, Patient satisfaction, control of symptoms, and late complications were assessed by follow-up at a mean of 6 and 15.4 months. RESULTS: There were six conversions to open surgery resulting in 48 laparoscopic total (LTF) and 35 laparoscopic partial (25 anterior and 10 Toupet) fundoplications (LPF), The following results were obtained for each respectively: preop Demeester score 44 vs. 39; OR time 2.9 vs, 2.5 hours; length of stay 3.6 vs, 4.1 days; early morbidity 25% vs, 1%, There were no mortalities. At a mean follow-up of 6 months, new-onset dysphagia was present in 8 (17%) vs. 2 (8%), respectively (NS), and both total and partial fundoplications appeared successful in controlling symptoms (98% vs, 97%), At a mean follow-up of 15.4 months, heartburn was resolved or improved in 76% vs, 87% (NS); regurgitation was improved or resolved in 93% vs, 93%; and patient satisfaction with the procedure was present in 93% vs. 97% (NS). Persistent dysphagia was present in 7.3% vs. 10.3% (NS) of patients, Early satiety was present more often in the partial fundoplication group (56% vs, 83% P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: Early follow-up suggests equal efficacy in controlling symptoms and in achieving patient satisfaction. A 6-month follow-up suggested a higher incidence of new dysphagia in the total fundoplication group; however, at 15-month follow-up there was no significant difference. (C) 1997 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.