Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of production of bioethanol from sorghum in the United States

被引:41
|
作者
Cai, Hao [1 ]
Dunn, Jennifer B. [1 ]
Wang, Zhichao [1 ]
Han, Jeongwoo [1 ]
Wang, Michael Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] Argonne Natl Lab, Div Energy Syst, Syst Assessment Grp, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
来源
关键词
Grain sorghum; Sweet sorghum; Forage sorghum; Ethanol; Life-cycle analysis; Greenhouse gas emissions; LAND-USE CHANGE; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; SWEET SORGHUM; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; CELLULOSIC ETHANOL; GRAIN-SORGHUM; STALK JUICE; FERMENTATION; FEEDSTOCK; CORN;
D O I
10.1186/1754-6834-6-141
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: The availability of feedstock options is a key to meeting the volumetric requirement of 136.3 billion liters of renewable fuels per year beginning in 2022, as required in the US 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act. Life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of sorghum-based ethanol need to be assessed for sorghum to play a role in meeting that requirement. Results: Multiple sorghum-based ethanol production pathways show diverse well-to-wheels (WTW) energy use and GHG emissions due to differences in energy use and fertilizer use intensity associated with sorghum growth and differences in the ethanol conversion processes. All sorghum-based ethanol pathways can achieve significant fossil energy savings. Relative to GHG emissions from conventional gasoline, grain sorghum-based ethanol can reduce WTW GHG emissions by 35% or 23%, respectively, when wet or dried distillers grains with solubles (DGS) is the co-product and fossil natural gas (FNG) is consumed as the process fuel. The reduction increased to 56% or 55%, respectively, for wet or dried DGS co-production when renewable natural gas (RNG) from anaerobic digestion of animal waste is used as the process fuel. These results do not include land-use change (LUC) GHG emissions, which we take as negligible. If LUC GHG emissions for grain sorghum ethanol as estimated by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are included (26 g CO(2)e/MJ), these reductions when wet DGS is co-produced decrease to 7% or 29% when FNG or RNG is used as the process fuel. Sweet sorghum-based ethanol can reduce GHG emissions by 71% or 72% without or with use of co-produced vinasse as farm fertilizer, respectively, in ethanol plants using only sugar juice to produce ethanol. If both sugar and cellulosic bagasse were used in the future for ethanol production, an ethanol plant with a combined heat and power (CHP) system that supplies all process energy can achieve a GHG emission reduction of 70% or 72%, respectively, without or with vinasse fertigation. Forage sorghum-based ethanol can achieve a 49% WTW GHG emission reduction when ethanol plants meet process energy demands with CHP. In the case of forage sorghum and an integrated sweet sorghum pathway, the use of a portion of feedstock to fuel CHP systems significantly reduces fossil fuel consumption and GHG emissions. Conclusions: This study provides new insight into life-cycle energy use and GHG emissions of multiple sorghum-based ethanol production pathways in the US. Our results show that adding sorghum feedstocks to the existing options for ethanol production could help in meeting the requirements for volumes of renewable, advanced and cellulosic bioethanol production in the US required by the EPA's Renewable Fuel Standard program.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of production of bioethanol from sorghum in the United States
    Hao Cai
    Jennifer B Dunn
    Zhichao Wang
    Jeongwoo Han
    Michael Q Wang
    [J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 6
  • [2] Carsharing's life-cycle impacts on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions
    Chen, T. Donna
    Kockelman, Kara M.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 47 : 276 - 284
  • [3] Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances of sugarcane ethanol production in Mexico
    Garcia, Carlos A.
    Fuentes, Alfredo
    Hennecke, Anna
    Riegelhaupt, Enrique
    Manzini, Fabio
    Masera, Omar
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2011, 88 (06) : 2088 - 2097
  • [4] Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas and Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions of Electric Vehicles in the United States
    Cai, Hao
    Wang, Michael
    Elgowainy, Amgad
    Han, Jeongwoo
    [J]. SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE POWERTRAINS, 2013, 2 (02) : 325 - 336
  • [5] Life-Cycle Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory for Water Treatment Systems
    Racoviceanu, Alina I.
    Karney, Bryan W.
    Kennedy, Christopher A.
    Colombo, Andrew F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2007, 13 (04) : 261 - 270
  • [6] Uncertainty in Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from United States Coal
    Venkatesh, Aranya
    Jaramillo, Paulina
    Griffin, W. Michael
    Matthews, H. Scott
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2012, 26 (08) : 4917 - 4923
  • [7] Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Biodiesel and Renewable Diesel Production in the United States
    Xu, Hui
    Ou, Longwen
    Li, Yuan
    Hawkins, Troy R.
    Wang, Michael
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 56 (12) : 7512 - 7521
  • [8] Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production
    Sierk de Jong
    Kay Antonissen
    Ric Hoefnagels
    Laura Lonza
    Michael Wang
    André Faaij
    Martin Junginger
    [J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 10
  • [9] Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production
    de Jong, Sierk
    Antonissen, Kay
    Hoefnagels, Ric
    Lonza, Laura
    Wang, Michael
    Faaij, Andre
    Junginger, Martin
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2017, 10
  • [10] Life-Cycle Inventory of Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Two Hydropower Projects in China
    Zhang, Qinfen
    Karney, Bryan
    MacLean, Heather L.
    Feng, Jingchun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2007, 13 (04) : 271 - 279