The processing of task-irrelevant emotion and colour in the Approach-Avoidance Task

被引:1
|
作者
Luo, Xijia [1 ]
Rinck, Mike [1 ]
Bekkering, Harold [2 ]
Becker, Eni S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Behav Sci Inst, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Emotion; colour; Approach-Avoidance Task; task relevance; SOCIAL ANXIETY; ACTION TENDENCIES; APPROACH BIAS; IMPLICIT; ATTENTION; INDIVIDUALS; AWARENESS; EXPLICIT; ALCOHOL; FACES;
D O I
10.1080/02699931.2018.1497951
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
When processing information about human faces, we have to integrate different sources of information like skin colour and emotional expression. In 3 experiments, we investigated how these features are processed in a top-down manner when task instructions determine the relevance of features, and in a bottom-up manner when the stimulus features themselves determine process priority. In Experiment 1, participants learned to respond with approach-avoidance movements to faces that presented both emotion and colour features (e.g. happy faces printed in greyscale). For each participant, only one of these two features was task-relevant while the other one could be ignored. In contrast to our predictions, we found better learning of task-irrelevant colour when emotion was task-relevant than vice versa. Experiment 2 showed that the learning of task-irrelevant emotional information was improved in general when participants' awareness was increased by adding NoGo-trials. Experiment 3 replicated these results for faces and emotional words. We conclude that during the processing of faces, both bottom-up and top-down processes are involved, such that task instructions and feature characteristics play a role. Ecologically significant features like emotions are not necessarily processed with high priority. The findings are discussed in the light of theories of attention and cognitive biases.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 562
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is Task-Irrelevant Learning Really Task-Irrelevant?
    Seitz, Aaron R.
    Watanabe, Takeo
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (11):
  • [2] TASK-IRRELEVANT EMOTION MODULATES STIMULUS PROCESSING IN AN EMOTIONAL WISCONSIN CARD SORTING TASK
    Selinger, Lenka
    Finke, Mareike
    Escera, Carles
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 49 : S39 - S39
  • [3] Modulation of amygdala response to task-irrelevant emotion
    Sebastian, Catherine L.
    McCrory, Eamon J.
    De Brito, Stephane A.
    Viding, Essi
    [J]. SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 12 (04) : 643 - 650
  • [4] Task-relevant and Task-irrelevant Dimensions Are Modulated Independently at a Task-irrelevant Location
    Lustig, Audrey G.
    Beck, Diane M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 24 (09) : 1884 - 1895
  • [5] A mobile approach-avoidance task
    Hilmar G. Zech
    Mark Rotteveel
    Wilco W. van Dijk
    Lotte F. van Dillen
    [J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2020, 52 : 2085 - 2097
  • [6] A mobile approach-avoidance task
    Zech, Hilmar G.
    Rotteveel, Mark
    van Dijk, Wilco W.
    van Dillen, Lotte F.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2020, 52 (05) : 2085 - 2097
  • [7] Task-irrelevant emotion facilitates face discrimination learning
    Lorenzino, Martina
    Caudek, Corrado
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2015, 108 : 56 - 66
  • [8] DEVELOPMENTAL TRENDS IN PROCESSING OF TASK-RELEVANT AND TASK-IRRELEVANT INFORMATION
    DRUKER, JF
    HAGEN, JW
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1969, 40 (02) : 371 - &
  • [9] Processing of task-irrelevant natural scenes in social anxiety
    Moriya, Jun
    Tanno, Yoshihiko
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2011, 138 (01) : 162 - 170
  • [10] The Influence of Task-Irrelevant Flankers Depends on the Composition of Emotion Categories
    Holthausen, Barbara Schulte
    Regenbogen, Christina
    Turetsky, Bruce I.
    Schneider, Frank
    Habel, Ute
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7