A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis: historical cohort study

被引:13
|
作者
Takami, Tomoya [1 ]
Yamaguchi, Tomoyuki [1 ]
Yoshitake, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Hatano, Kotaro [1 ]
Kataoka, Naoki [1 ]
Tomita, Masafumi [1 ]
Makimoto, Shinichiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Kishiwada Tokushukai Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, 4-27-1 Kamoricho, Kishiwada, Osaka 5960042, Japan
关键词
Complicated appendicitis; Laparoscopic appendectomy; Open appendectomy; Acute appendicitis; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; OPEN SURGERY; METAANALYSIS; ABSCESS; ADULTS; OUTCOMES; CHILDREN; STUMP;
D O I
10.1007/s00068-019-01086-5
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background Appendectomy is one of the most common operations. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is considered first-line treatment, but the use of LA for treatment of complicated appendicitis remains controversial. Here, we performed a retrospective analysis to compare clinical outcomes between patients treated with LA and those who underwent open appendectomy (OA). Methods Data for 179 patients who underwent an operation for the treatment of complicated appendicitis at our hospital between 2011 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The selection included 89 patients who underwent a conventional appendectomy and 90 patients who were treated laparoscopically. Outcome measures such as mean operative time, blood loss, time until oral intake duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the concurrent effects of the examined factors on the rate of postoperative complications. Results The mean ages of patients in the OA and LA groups were 50.17 +/- 22.77 and 50.13 +/- 25.84 year. Mean operative times were longer in the LA group than OA (10.2.56 +/- 44.4 versus 85.4 +/- 43.11 min;p = 0.009). The duration of hospital stay was shorter for the LA group (9.61 +/- 5.57 versus 12.19 +/- 8.4;p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in return to consumption of oral intake between the LA and OA groups (2.03 +/- 1.66 versus 2.48 +/- 2.17;p = 0.123). Multivariable analysis found that the rate of postoperative complications was significantly reduced for the LA group, in comparison with the postoperative-complication rate of the OA group (16.7% versus 27%; odds ratio 0.376; 95% CI 0.153-0.923;p = 0.0327). Conclusions These results suggest that LA is a safe and efficient operative procedure that provides clinically beneficial advantages in comparison with OA. Thus, when possible, appendectomy for complicated appendicitis should be attempted using a laparoscopic approach.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 851
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis: historical cohort study
    Tomoya Takami
    Tomoyuki Yamaguchi
    Hiroyuki Yoshitake
    Kotaro Hatano
    Naoki Kataoka
    Masafumi Tomita
    Shinichiro Makimoto
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2020, 46 : 847 - 851
  • [2] Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis
    Horvath, P.
    Lange, J.
    Bachmann, R.
    Struller, F.
    Koenigsrainer, A.
    Zdichavsky, M.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (01): : 199 - 205
  • [3] Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis
    P. Horvath
    J. Lange
    R. Bachmann
    F. Struller
    A. Königsrainer
    M. Zdichavsky
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 199 - 205
  • [4] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis
    Ferranti, F.
    Corona, F.
    Siani, L. M.
    Stefanuto, A.
    Aguzzi, D.
    Santoro, E.
    GIORNALE DI CHIRURGIA, 2012, 33 (8-9): : 263 - 267
  • [5] Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis: A Comparison with Open Appendectomy
    Goutaro Katsuno
    Kunihiko Nagakari
    Seiichiro Yoshikawa
    Kazuyoshi Sugiyama
    Masaki Fukunaga
    World Journal of Surgery, 2009, 33 : 208 - 214
  • [6] Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis: A Comparison with Open Appendectomy
    Katsuno, Goutaro
    Nagakari, Kunihiko
    Yoshikawa, Seiichiro
    Sugiyama, Kazuyoshi
    Fukunaga, Masaki
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 33 (02) : 208 - 214
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis
    Yau, Kwok Kay
    Siu, Wing Tai
    Tang, Chun Ngai
    Yang, George Pei Cheung
    Li, Michael Ka Wah
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 205 (01) : 60 - 65
  • [8] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis
    del Pino, Cristobal
    Munoz, Rodrigo
    Rada, Gabriel
    MEDWAVE, 2018, 18 (08):
  • [9] Laparoscopic or open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis?
    Kienle, Peter
    Buechler, Markus W.
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 3 (12): : 668 - 669
  • [10] Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy for Complicated and Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children
    Sheraz R. Markar
    Simon Blackburn
    Richard Cobb
    Alan Karthikesalingam
    Jessica Evans
    James Kinross
    Omar Faiz
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2012, 16 : 1993 - 2004