Multicenter randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients

被引:145
|
作者
Phillips, P
Shafran, S
Garber, G
Rotstein, C
Smaill, F
Fong, I
Salit, I
Miller, M
Williams, K
Conly, JM
Singer, J
Ioannou, S
机构
[1] UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA,VANCOUVER,BC V6Z 1Y6,CANADA
[2] UNIV ALBERTA,DIV INFECT DIS,WALTER MACKENZIE CTR 2E4 11,EDMONTON,AB T6G 2B7,CANADA
[3] UNIV OTTAWA,OTTAWA GEN HOSP,DIV INFECT DIS,OTTAWA,ON K1H 8L6,CANADA
[4] HENDERSON GEN HOSP,MCMASTER MED UNIT,DIV INFECT DIS,HAMILTON,ON L8V 1C3,CANADA
[5] MCMASTER UNIV,MED CTR,DIV INFECT DIS,HAMILTON,ON L8N 3Z5,CANADA
[6] ST MICHAELS HOSP,TORONTO,ON M5B 1W8,CANADA
[7] TORONTO GEN HOSP,DIV INFECT DIS,TORONTO,ON M5G 1L7,CANADA
[8] MCGILL UNIV,JEWISH GEN HOSP,DEPT MED MICROBIOL,MONTREAL,PQ H3T 1E2,CANADA
[9] ROYAL UNIV HOSP,DIV INFECT DIS,SASKATOON,SK S7N 0X0,CANADA
[10] TORONTO GEN HOSP,TORONTO,ON M5G 2C4,CANADA
[11] UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA,DEPT HLTH CARE & EPIDEMIOL,VANCOUVER,BC V6Z 1Y6,CANADA
[12] PFIZER CANADA INC,POINTE CLAIRE,PQ H9R 4V2,CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF01726360
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
A randomized trial was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of fluconazole versus that of amphotericin B in the treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic adults. Enrollment was stratified by disease severity (APACHE tl score). Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive amphotericin B 0.6 mg/kg/day (cumulative dose 8 mg/kg) or fluconazole 800 mg intravenous loading dose, then 400 mg daily for four weeks (intravenous for at least IO days). Patients were monitored for six months. A total of 106 patients were enrolled. A protocol amendment implemented midway through the trial required patients to be removed from the study and treated with amphotericin B if species identification indicated candidemia due to Candida glabrata or Candida krusei. Baseline characteristics were similar for the two groups; 103 patients (fluconazole, 50; amphotericin B, 53) met the major enrollment criteria. The intention-to-treat analysis indicated successful therapy in 50% of fluconazole recipients compared to 58% of the amphotericin B group (p = 0.39; one-sided 95% Cl, -8 to 24%). The efficacy analysis included 84 patients (fluconazole, 42; amphotericin B, 42); successful outcomes were observed in 57% and 62% of cases in the fluconazole and amphotericin B groups, respectively (p = 0.66: one-sided 95% CI, -12 to 22%). The mortality at day 14 for the fluconazole group was 26% and for the amphotericin B group 21% (p = 0.52; chi-square test) and remained similar throughout the course of follow-up. Drug-related adverse events were more frequent with amphotericin B than with fluconazole and prompted switching of therapy for two (4%) and zero cases, respectively Fluconazole and amphotericin B were associated with similar clinical response rates and survival in the treatment of candidemia among non-neutropenic patients; however, drug-related adverse events were more frequent with amphotericin B.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 345
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multicenter randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients
    P. Phillips
    S. Shafran
    G. Garber
    C. Rotstein
    F. Smaill
    I. Fong
    I. Salit
    M. Miller
    K. Williams
    J. M. Conly
    J. Singer
    S. Ioannou
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 1997, 16 : 337 - 345
  • [2] Economic analysis of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for the treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients
    Dranitsaris, G
    Phillips, P
    Rotstein, C
    Puodziunas, A
    Shafran, S
    Garber, G
    Smaill, F
    Salit, I
    Miller, M
    Williams, K
    Conly, J
    Singer, J
    Ioannou, S
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1998, 13 (05) : 509 - 518
  • [3] Economic Analysis of Fluconazole versus Amphotericin B for the Treatment of Candidemia in Non-Neutropenic Patients
    George Dranitsaris
    Peter Phillips
    Coleman Rotstein
    Anitasha Puodziunas
    Steve Shafran
    Gary Garber
    Fiona Smaill
    Irving Salit
    Mark Miller
    Kurt Williams
    John Conly
    Joel Singer
    Steve Ioannou
    PharmacoEconomics, 1998, 13 : 509 - 518
  • [5] FLUCONAZOLE OR AMPHOTERICIN FOR CANDIDAEMIA IN NON-NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS
    COLVILLE, A
    WALE, MCJ
    LANCET, 1991, 337 (8757): : 1605 - 1606
  • [6] Current treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients. Amphotericin B or fluconazole? Retrospective study of 62 consecutive cases
    Reinoso, PC
    Garcia, JMA
    Bermejo, CL
    Vela, JLP
    Cubedo, RC
    Sanz, FS
    Rodriguez, ARN
    REVISTA CLINICA ESPANOLA, 1997, 197 (12): : 799 - 803
  • [7] Voriconazole versus a regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial
    Kullberg, BJ
    Sobel, JD
    Ruhnke, M
    Pappas, PG
    Viscoli, C
    Rex, JH
    Cleary, JD
    Rubinstein, E
    Church, LWP
    Brown, JM
    Schlamm, HT
    Oborska, IT
    Hilton, F
    Hodges, MR
    LANCET, 2005, 366 (9495): : 1435 - 1442
  • [8] A multicenter, randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for empiric antifungal therapy of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer
    Winston, DJ
    Hathorn, JW
    Schuster, MG
    Schiller, GJ
    Territo, MC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 108 (04): : 282 - 289
  • [9] ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF ISOLATES FROM A RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER TRIAL OF FLUCONAZOLE VERSUS AMPHOTERICIN-B AS TREATMENT OF NONNEUTROPENIC PATIENTS WITH CANDIDEMIA
    REX, JH
    PFALLER, MA
    BARRY, AL
    NELSON, PW
    WEBB, CD
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1995, 39 (01) : 40 - 44
  • [10] A RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING FLUCONAZOLE WITH AMPHOTERICIN-B FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANDIDEMIA IN PATIENTS WITHOUT NEUTROPENIA
    REX, JH
    BENNETT, JE
    SUGAR, AM
    PAPPAS, PG
    VANDERHORST, CM
    EDWARDS, JE
    WASHBURN, RG
    SCHELD, WM
    KARCHMER, AW
    DINE, AP
    LEVENSTEIN, MJ
    WEBB, CD
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (20): : 1325 - 1330