Functional limits of agreement: A method for assessing agreement between measurements of gait curves

被引:8
|
作者
Roislien, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rennie, L. [2 ]
Skaaret, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Rikshosp, Oslo, Norway
[2] Sunnaas Rehabil Hosp, Nesoddtangen, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Inst Basic Med Sci, Dept Biostat, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
关键词
3D Gait analysis; Gait curves; Reliability; Limits of agreement; Functional data analysis; RELIABILITY; REPEATABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.05.001
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Three dimensional measurements of gait is a widely used tool in clinical gait analysis, and the evaluation of the reliability and reproducibility of the method is a recurring topic in the literature. The reliability of gait curve measurements is often assessed by extraction of single points from the gait curves before applying traditional reliability measures for scalars. This approach does, however, not explore the entire gait curves as continuous functions of time. In order to assess agreement between gait curves measured by different measurement methods, or measurers, we propose an extension of the concept of limits of agreement (LoA) to curve data. The LoA represent the estimated variation in the actual observations, which are then to be accompanied by an evaluation of whether this observed variation is within clinically acceptable limits. The generalization of the methodology from scalars to continuous function, e.g. gait curves, can be done using functional data analysis (FDA), a statistical methodology particularly developed for analyzing functional data. The resulting functional limits of agreement (FLoA) are continuous functions from 0 to 100% of the gait cycle, representing the difference in gait curves as measured by different measurement methods. The FLoA are presented in actual degrees for each joint and plane under study. The proposed methodology is demonstrated on real data from an inter-rater repeatability study. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 499
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing agreement between two measurement systems: An alternative to the limits of agreement approach
    Stevens, Nathaniel T.
    Steiner, Stefan H.
    MacKay, R. Jock
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (06) : 2487 - 2504
  • [2] Limits of agreement method for comparing TSD and FWD measurements
    Katicha, Samer W.
    Flintsch, Gerardo W.
    Ferne, Brian
    Bryce, James
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, 2014, 15 (06) : 532 - 541
  • [3] An alternative method for assessing the agreement between test results
    Korobko, A.
    Kotova, Yu.
    UKRAINIAN METROLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2024, (01): : 4 - 10
  • [4] Assessing agreement of measurements and predictions in geomorphology
    Cox, Nicholas J.
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2006, 76 (3-4) : 332 - 346
  • [5] An overview on assessing agreement with continuous measurements
    Barnhart, Huiman X.
    Haber, Michael J.
    Lin, Lawrence I.
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2007, 17 (04) : 529 - 569
  • [6] Use of clinical tolerance limits for assessing agreement
    Patrick, Taffe
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (01) : 195 - 206
  • [7] A Framework for Assessing Broad Sense Agreement Between Ordinal and Continuous Measurements
    Peng, Limin
    Li, Ruosha
    Guo, Ying
    Manatunga, Amita
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 106 (496) : 1592 - 1601
  • [8] Statistical methods for assessing agreement between double readings of clinical measurements
    Vieira, Sonia
    Corrente, Jose Eduardo
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2011, 19 (05) : 488 - 492
  • [9] Assessing intra- and inter-method agreement of functional data
    Yue, Ye
    Jang, Jeong Hoon
    Manatunga, Amita K.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (01) : 112 - 129
  • [10] Assessing Agreement between Methods of Measurement
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Bland, J. Martin
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2017, 63 (10) : 1653 - 1654