Comparison of image quality in magnetic resonance imaging of the knee at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla using 32-channel receiver coils

被引:13
|
作者
Schoth, F. [1 ]
Kraemer, N. [1 ]
Niendorf, T. [1 ]
Hohl, C. [1 ]
Gunther, R. W. [1 ]
Krombach, G. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, D-52057 Aachen, Germany
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; diagnostic imaging; anatomy; cross-sectional; knee joint; three Tesla;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-008-0972-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
We examined to what degree the visualization of anatomic structures in the human knee is improved using 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and many element RF receive coils as compared to 1.5 T. We imaged 20 knees at 1.5 and 3.0 T using T2-weighted STIR, T2-weighted gradient echo, T1-weighted spin-echo, true-FISP and T2-weighted fast spin echo techniques in conjunction with 32-element RF coil arrays. The 3.0-T examination was considerably faster than its 1.5-T counterpart. A superior subjective visibility at 3.0 T vs 1.5 T was found in 27 of 50 evaluated structures (meniscus, ligaments) with the exception of true-FISP techniques. The 3.0-T examination provided a better visibility (evaluated by blinded consensus-reading by two radiologists) of small structures such as the ligamentum transversum genu. Also, cartilage was better delineated at 3.0 T. A 23% increased average signal-to-noise ratio as assessed using a temporal filter was observed at 3.0 T as compared to 1.5 T. At 3.0 T, imaging of the human knee is faster and results in a subjective visibility of anatomic structures that is superior to and competitive with 1.5 T.
引用
收藏
页码:2258 / 2264
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of image quality in magnetic resonance imaging of the knee at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla using 32-channel receiver coils
    F. Schoth
    N. Kraemer
    T. Niendorf
    C. Hohl
    R. W. Gunther
    G. A. Krombach
    European Radiology, 2008, 18 : 2258 - 2264
  • [2] Diagnosis of temporomandibular dysfunction syndrome—image quality at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
    Martina Schmid-Schwap
    Wolfgang Drahanowsky
    Margit Bristela
    Michael Kundi
    Eva Piehslinger
    Soraya Robinson
    European Radiology, 2009, 19 : 1239 - 1245
  • [3] Diagnosis of temporomandibular dysfunction syndrome-image quality at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
    Schmid-Schwap, Martina
    Drahanowsky, Wolfgang
    Bristela, Margit
    Kundi, Michael
    Piehslinger, Eva
    Robinson, Soraya
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (05) : 1239 - 1245
  • [4] Magnetic Resonance of Rectal Cancer Response to Therapy: An Image Quality Comparison between 3.0 and 1.5 Tesla
    Caruso, Damiano
    Zerunian, Marta
    De Santis, Domenico
    Biondi, Tommaso
    Paolantonio, Pasquale
    Rengo, Marco
    Bellini, Davide
    Ferrari, Riccardo
    Ciolina, Maria
    Lucertini, Elena
    Polici, Michela
    Iannicelli, Elsa
    Tombolini, Vincenzo
    Laghi, Andrea
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 2020
  • [5] Coronary magnetic resonance angiography: in vivo comparison of image quality at 1.5 Tesla versus 3.0 Tesla with Parallel Radiofrequency Transmission
    Tarique Hussain
    Khalid Hussain
    Sarah A Peel
    Gerald F Greil
    Rene M Botnar
    Andrea Wiethoff
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 14 (Suppl 1)
  • [6] High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint - Image quality at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla in volunteers
    Stehling, Christoph
    Vieth, Volker
    Bachmann, Rainald
    Nassenstein, Isabelle
    Kugel, Harald
    Kooijman, Hendrik
    Heindel, Walter
    Fischbach, Roman
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2007, 42 (06) : 428 - 434
  • [7] Comparison of 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Acute Demyelinating Optic Neuritis
    Hur, Minjun
    Madhavan, Ajay A.
    Hodge, David O.
    Eckel, Laurence J.
    Pittock, Sean J.
    Flanagan, Eoin P.
    Bhatti, M. Tariq
    Chen, John J.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 42 (03) : 297 - 302
  • [8] Differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative parkinsonism using magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla
    Mueller, C.
    Tashiro, J.
    Hussl, A.
    Schocke, M.
    Scherfler, C.
    Gizewski, E.
    Poewe, W.
    Seppi, K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2015, 22 : 304 - 304
  • [9] Magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography - Quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0 Tesla with 1.5 Tesla
    Schindera, Sebastian T.
    Miller, Chad M.
    Ho, Lisa M.
    DeLong, David M.
    Merkle, Elmar M.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2007, 42 (06) : 399 - 405
  • [10] Whole Heart Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography Using 32-Channel Cardiac Coils and High Parallel Imaging Factor
    Nagata, Motonori
    Sakuma, Hajime
    Ishida, Nanaka
    Nakajima, Hiroshi
    Ishida, Masaki
    Miyahara, Masatoshi
    Kato, Shingo
    Nakamura, Mashio
    Ito, Masaaki
    Takeda, Kan
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (18) : S778 - S778