Repetition Suppression and Expectation Suppression Are Dissociable in Time in Early Auditory Evoked Fields

被引:227
|
作者
Todorovic, Ana [1 ]
de lange, Floris P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE | 2012年 / 32卷 / 39期
关键词
MISMATCH NEGATIVITY MMN; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; PREDICTION ERRORS; VISUAL-CORTEX; BRAIN; P50; ATTENTION; RESPONSES; TRANSITIONS; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2227-12.2012
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Repetition of a stimulus, as well as valid expectation that a stimulus will occur, both attenuate the neural response to it. These effects, repetition suppression and expectation suppression, are typically confounded in paradigms in which the nonrepeated stimulus is also relatively rare (e. g., in oddball blocks of mismatch negativity paradigms, or in repetition suppression paradigms with multiple repetitions before an alternation). However, recent hierarchical models of sensory processing inspire the hypothesis that the two might be separable in time, with repetition suppression occurring earlier, as a consequence of local transition probabilities, and suppression by expectation occurring later, as a consequence of learnt statistical regularities. Here we test this hypothesis in an auditory experiment by orthogonally manipulating stimulus repetition and stimulus expectation and, using magnetoencephalography, measuring the neural response over time in human subjects. We found that stimulus repetition (but not stimulus expectation) attenuates the early auditory response (40-60 ms), while stimulus expectation (but not stimulus repetition) attenuates the subsequent, intermediate stage of auditory processing (100-200 ms). These findings are well in line with hierarchical predictive coding models, which posit sequential stages of prediction error resolution, contingent on the level at which the hypothesis is generated.
引用
收藏
页码:13389 / 13395
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Repetition suppression of the rat auditory evoked potential at brief stimulus intervals
    Budd, Timothy W.
    Nakamura, Tamo
    Fulham, William R.
    Todd, Juanita
    Schall, Ulrich
    Hunter, Michael
    Hodgson, Deborah M.
    Michie, Patricia T.
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2013, 1498 : 59 - 68
  • [2] Expectation affects neural repetition suppression in infancy
    Emberson, Lauren L.
    Boldin, Alex M.
    Robertson, Claire E.
    Cannon, Grace
    Aslin, Richard N.
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 37
  • [3] IS AUDITORY REPETITION SUPPRESSION INTACT IN SCHIZOPHRENIA?
    Andreaggi, Christian A.
    Coffman, Brian A.
    Haigh, Sarah M.
    Murphy, Timothy K.
    Salisbury, Dean F.
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 53 : S62 - S62
  • [4] Auditory evoked fields measured noninvasively with small-animal MEG reveal rapid repetition suppression in the guinea pig
    Christianson, G. Bjoern
    Chait, Maria
    de Cheveigne, Alain
    Linden, Jennifer F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 112 (12) : 3053 - 3065
  • [5] fMRI Repetition Suppression: Neuronal Adaptation or Stimulus Expectation?
    Larsson, Jonas
    Smith, Andrew T.
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2012, 22 (03) : 567 - 576
  • [6] Decoupling expectation and adaptation effects in fMRI repetition suppression
    Yellin, D.
    Malach, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 48 : S128 - S128
  • [7] Unsuppressible Repetition Suppression and exemplar-specific Expectation Suppression in the Fusiform Face Area
    Pajani, Aureliane
    Kouider, Sid
    Roux, Paul
    de Gardelle, Vincent
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [8] Unsuppressible Repetition Suppression and exemplar-specific Expectation Suppression in the Fusiform Face Area
    Auréliane Pajani
    Sid Kouider
    Paul Roux
    Vincent de Gardelle
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 7
  • [9] Speech-induced suppression of evoked auditory fields in children who stutter
    Beal, Deryk S.
    Quraan, Maher A.
    Cheyne, Douglas O.
    Taylor, Margot J.
    Gracco, Vincent L.
    De Nil, Luc F.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 54 (04) : 2994 - 3003
  • [10] Two kinds of fMRI repetition suppression? Evidence for dissociable neural mechanisms
    Epstein, Russell A.
    Parker, Whitney E.
    Feiler, Alana M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 99 (06) : 2877 - 2886