Adapting Community Detection Algorithms for Disease Module Identification in Heterogeneous Biological Networks

被引:38
|
作者
Tripathi, Beethika [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Parthasarathy, Srinivasan [4 ,5 ]
Sinha, Himanshu [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Raman, Karthik [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Ravindran, Balaraman [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Madras, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Madras, Initiat Biol Syst Engn, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol Madras, Robert Bosch Ctr Data Sci & AI, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[6] Indian Inst Technol Madras, Bhupat & Jyoti Mehta Sch Biosci, Dept Biotechnol, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
overlapping community detection; non-overlapping community detection; disease module identification; biological networks; heterogeneous networks; PROTEIN; PATHWAYS; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.3389/fgene.2019.00164
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Biological networks catalog the complex web of interactions happening between different molecules, typically proteins, within a cell. These networks are known to be highly modular, with groups of proteins associated with specific biological functions. Human diseases often arise from the dysfunction of one or more such proteins of the biological functional group. The ability, to identify and automatically extract these modules has implications for understanding the etiology of different diseases as well as the functional roles of different protein modules in disease. The recent DREAM challenge posed the problem of identifying disease modules from six heterogeneous networks of proteins/genes. There exist many community detection algorithms, but all of them are not adaptable to the biological context, as these networks are densely connected and the size of biologically relevant modules is quite small. The contribution of this study is 3-fold: first, we present a comprehensive assessment of many classic community detection algorithms for biological networks to identify non-overlapping communities, and propose heuristics to identify small and structurally well-defined communities-core modules. We evaluated our performance over 180 GWAS datasets. In comparison to traditional approaches, with our proposed approach we could identify 50% more number of disease-relevant modules. Thus, we show that it is important to identify more compact modules for better performance. Next, we sought to understand the peculiar characteristics of disease-enriched modules and what causes standard community detection algorithms to detect so few of them. We performed a comprehensive analysis of the interaction patterns of known disease genes to understand the structure of disease modules and show that merely considering the known disease genes set as a module does not give good quality clusters, as measured by typical metrics such as modularity and conductance. We go on to present a methodology leveraging these known disease genes, to also include the neighboring nodes of these genes into a module, to form good quality clusters and subsequently extract a "gold-standard set" of disease modules. Lastly, we demonstrate, with justification, that "overlapping" community detection algorithms should be the preferred choice for disease module identification since several genes participate in multiple biological functions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Module identification from heterogeneous biological data using multiobjective evolutionary algorithms
    Calonder, Michael
    Bleuler, Stefan
    Zitzler, Eckart
    PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE - PPSN IX, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4193 : 573 - 582
  • [2] Topological and functional comparison of community detection algorithms in biological networks
    Rahiminejad, Sara
    Maurya, Mano R.
    Subramaniam, Shankar
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [3] An Adaptive Refinement for Community Detection Methods for Disease Module Identification in Biological Networks using Novel Metric based on Connectivity, Conductance & Modularity
    Mall, Raghvendra
    Ullah, Ehsan
    Kunji, Khalid
    Bensmail, Halima
    Ceccarelli, Michele
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE (BIBM), 2017, : 2282 - 2284
  • [4] Topological and functional comparison of community detection algorithms in biological networks
    Sara Rahiminejad
    Mano R. Maurya
    Shankar Subramaniam
    BMC Bioinformatics, 20
  • [5] Spectral algorithms for heterogeneous biological networks
    McDonald, Martin
    Higham, Desmond J.
    Vass, J. Keith
    BRIEFINGS IN FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS, 2012, 11 (06) : 457 - 468
  • [6] Comparison of module detection algorithms in protein networks and investigation of the biological meaning of predicted modules
    Shailesh Tripathi
    Salissou Moutari
    Matthias Dehmer
    Frank Emmert-Streib
    BMC Bioinformatics, 17
  • [7] Comparison of module detection algorithms in protein networks and investigation of the biological meaning of predicted modules
    Tripathi, Shailesh
    Moutari, Salissou
    Dehmer, Matthias
    Emmert-Streib, Frank
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2016, 17
  • [8] MUMI: Multitask Module Identification for Biological Networks
    Chen, Weiqi
    Zhu, Zexuan
    He, Shan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2020, 24 (04) : 765 - 776
  • [9] Community detection from biological and social networks: A comparative analysis of metaheuristic algorithms
    Atay, Yilmaz
    Koc, Ismail
    Babaoglu, Ismail
    Kodaz, Halife
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 50 : 194 - 211
  • [10] Constructing module maps for integrated analysis of heterogeneous biological networks
    Amar, David
    Shamir, Ron
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2014, 42 (07) : 4208 - 4219