Toward Sustainable Development: Decoupling the High Ecological Footprint from Human Society Development: A Case Study of Hong Kong

被引:7
|
作者
Shi, Xiangyun [1 ]
Matsui, Takanori [1 ]
Machimura, Takashi [1 ]
Gan, Xiaoyu [2 ]
Hu, Ang [2 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Div Sustainable Energy & Environm Engn, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Sichuan Univ, Coll Architecture & Environm, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
关键词
sustainable development; decoupling; ecological footprint; biocapacity; human development index; Hong Kong; Singapore; CHINA;
D O I
10.3390/su12104177
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As a global financial center and one of the world's first-tier cities, Hong Kong is committed to sustainable development and it expects to become the most sustainable city in Asia. With this in mind, this paper evaluates the level of sustainable development in Hong Kong considering the factors of ecological footprint, biocapacity, and the human development index (HDI) from 1995 to 2016, in order to make policy recommendations for transforming Hong Kong into a more sustainable city. Between 1995 and 2016, a period during which the HDI rose, the per capita ecological footprint of Hong Kong increased from 4.842 gha to 6.223 gha. Moreover, fossil energy consumption had a crucial impact on the city's ecological footprint, whereas the biocapacity of Hong Kong declined gradually. By contrast, Singapore, a city-state with an area similar to Hong Kong's, presented the opposite situation-the HDI increased while the ecological footprint decreased. We performed a further comparative analysis and a SWOT analysis of Singapore and Hong Kong to elaborate on how to decouple the large ecological footprint from human society development. Concluding that the focus must be on energy consumption, reduction of the human activities' negative impacts on marine environment, citizens and government, we provide policy suggestions for transforming toward a "high HDI and low footprint" sustainable development society in Hong Kong.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ecological Footprint and Decoupling in the Sustainable Development of a Region
    Shut'ko, Larisa
    Samorodova, Lyudmila
    Ivanov, Anastas
    VTH INTERNATIONAL INNOVATIVE MINING SYMPOSIUM, 2020, 174
  • [2] Ecological modernisation as a weak form of sustainable development in Hong Kong
    Hills, P
    Welford, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2002, 9 (04): : 315 - 331
  • [3] The ecological footprint as indicator for sustainable development - Results of an international case study
    van Vuuren, DP
    Smeets, EMW
    de Kruijf, HAM
    MANAGING FOR HEALTHY ECOSYSTEMS, 2003, : 343 - 352
  • [4] Study of Wuhan Ecological Sustainable Development Based on Ecological Footprint
    Zhang Xin
    URBANIZATION AND LAND RESERVATION RESEARCH: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF URBANIZATION AND LAND RESOURCE UTILIZATION, 2010, : 471 - 475
  • [5] Sustainable development of heritage conservation and tourism: A Hong Kong case study on colonial heritage
    Lai, Lawrence W. C.
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 28 (05) : 1181 - 1188
  • [7] Evaluation on Sustainable Development of Jinan City Based on Ecological Footprint and Human Development Index
    Han Xuemei
    Shi Jinghua
    INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CONFERENCE OF RESOURCES UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTIVENESS: CALL OF PAPER FROM 2009 AGM, 2009, : 460 - +
  • [8] Impacts of the ecological footprint on sustainable development: Evidence from China
    Li, Xiuqing
    Xiao, Liming
    Tian, Chao
    Zhu, Bangzhu
    Chevallier, Julien
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 352
  • [9] Sustainable development and social policy: a case of indigenous villages in Hong Kong
    Ma, Kwok Wai
    ASIAN EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2016, 5 (03) : 305 - 317
  • [10] Engaging Employees in Sustainable Development - a Case Study of Environmental Education and Awareness Training in Hong Kong
    Law, Michelle Man Suet
    Hills, Peter
    Hau, Billy Chi Hang
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 26 (01) : 84 - 97