Bacterial direct-fed microbials fail to reduce methane emissions in primiparous lactating dairy cows

被引:26
|
作者
Jeyanathan, Jeyamalar [1 ,2 ]
Martin, Cecile [1 ]
Eugene, Maguy [1 ]
Ferlay, Anne [1 ]
Popova, Milka [1 ]
Morgavi, Diego P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Clermont Auvergne, INRA, VetAgro Sup, UMR 1213 Herbivores, F-63122 St Genes Champanelle, France
[2] Univ Ghent, Lab Anim Nutr & Anim Product Qual, Fac Biosci Engn, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Bacterial direct-fed microbial; Dairy cow; Methane; Milk fatty acid; FATTY-ACID-COMPOSITION; RUMINAL FERMENTATION; NUTRIENT DIGESTIBILITY; ENERGY-BALANCE; RUMEN; PROPIONIBACTERIA; DEGRADATION; PROFILES; LINSEED; CATTLE;
D O I
10.1186/s40104-019-0342-9
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Direct-fed microbials (DFM) are considered as a promising technique to improve animal productivity without affecting animal health or harming the environment. The potential of three bacterial DFM to reduce methane (CH4) emissions, modulate ruminal fermentation, milk production and composition of primiparous dairy cows was examined in this study. As previous reports have shown that DFM respond differently to different diets, two contrasting diets were used in this study. Eight lactating primiparous cows were randomly divided into two groups that were fed a corn silage-based, high-starch diet (HSD) or a grass silage-based, high-fiber diet (HFD). Cows in each dietary group were randomly assigned to four treatments in a 4 x 4 Latin square design. The bacterial DFM used were selected for their proven CH4-reducing effect in vitro. Treatments included control (without DFM) and 3 DFM treatments: Propionibacterium freudenreichii 53-W (2.9 x 10(10) colony forming units (CFU)/cow per day), Lactobacillus pentosus D31 (3.6 x 10(11) CFU/cow per day) and Lactobacillus bulgaricus D1 (4.6 x 10(10) CFU/cow per day). Each experimental period included 4 weeks of treatment and 1 week of wash-out, with measures performed in the fourth week of the treatment period. Enteric CH4 emissions were measured during 3 consecutive days using respiration chambers. Rumen samples were collected for ruminal fermentation parameters and quantitative microbial analyses. Milk samples were collected for composition analysis. Body weight of cows were recorded at the end of each treatment period. Irrespective of diet, no mitigating effect of DFM was observed on CH4 emissions in dairy cows. In contrast, Propionibacterium increased CH4 intensity by 27% (g CH4/kg milk) in cows fed HSD. There was no effect of DFM on other fermentation parameters and on bacterial, archaeal and protozoal numbers. Similarly, the effect of DFM on milk fatty acid composition was negligible. Propionibacterium and L. pentosus DFM tended to increase body weight gain with HSD. We conclude that, contrary to the effect previously observed in vitro, bacterial DFM Propionibacterium freudenreichii 53-W, Lactobacillus pentosus D31 and Lactobacillus bulgaricus D1 did not alter ruminal fermentation and failed to reduce CH4 emissions in lactating primiparous cows fed high-starch or high-fiber diets.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bacterial direct-fed microbials fail to reduce methane emissions in primiparous lactating dairy cows
    Jeyamalar Jeyanathan
    Cécile Martin
    Maguy Eugène
    Anne Ferlay
    Milka Popova
    Diego P. Morgavi
    Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 10
  • [2] Bacterial direct-fed microbials fail to reduce methane emissions in primiparous lactating dairy cows
    Jeyamalar Jeyanathan
    Cécile Martin
    Maguy Eugène
    Anne Ferlay
    Milka Popova
    Diego P.Morgavi
    Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2019, 10 (03) : 802 - 810
  • [3] Using Lactic Acid Bacteria as Silage Inoculants or Direct-Fed Microbials to Improve In Vitro Degradability and Reduce Methane Emissions in Dairy Cows
    Huyen, Nguyen Thi
    Martinez, Ines
    Pellikaan, Wilbert
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [4] The use of direct-fed microbials for mitigation of ruminant methane emissions: a review
    Jeyanathan, J.
    Martin, C.
    Morgavi, D. P.
    ANIMAL, 2014, 8 (02) : 250 - 261
  • [5] The Effect of Direct-Fed Lactobacillus Species on Milk Production and Methane Emissions of Dairy Cows
    Williams, S. Richard O.
    Jacobs, Joe L.
    Chandra, Subhash
    Soust, Martin
    Russo, Victoria M.
    Douglas, Meaghan L.
    Hess, Pablo S. Alvarez
    ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [6] Effects of the addition of direct-fed microbials and glycerol to the diet of lactating dairy cows on milk yield and apparent efficiency of yield
    Boyd, J.
    West, J. W.
    Bernard, J. K.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (09) : 4616 - 4622
  • [7] Effect of direct-fed microbials on performance, diet digestibility, and rumen characteristics of Holstein dairy cows
    Raeth-Knight, M. L.
    Linn, J. G.
    Jung, H. G.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2007, 90 (04) : 1802 - 1809
  • [8] Enzymes and direct fed microbials in diets for dairy cows
    Beauchemin, KA
    Rode, LM
    Yang, WZ
    Newbold, CJ
    2000 TRI-STATE DAIRY NUTRITION CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 85 - 95
  • [9] In vitro evaluation of Lactobacillus plantarum as direct-fed microbials in high-producing dairy cows diets
    Monteiro, Hugo F.
    Lelis, Ana Laura J.
    Brandao, Virginia L. N.
    Faccenda, Andressa
    Avila, Andre S.
    Arce-Cordero, Jose
    Silva, Lorrayny G.
    Dai, Xiaoxia
    Restelatto, Rasiel
    Carvalho, Perivaldo
    Lima, Leni R.
    Faciola, Antonio P.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 4 (01) : 214 - 228
  • [10] Effects of direct-fed microbial supplementation on performance and immune parameters of lactating dairy cows
    Oyebade, A. O.
    Lee, S.
    Sultana, H.
    Arriola, K.
    Duvalsaint, E.
    Guzman, C. Nino De
    Marenchino, I. Fernandez
    Pacheco, L. Marroquin
    Amaro, F.
    Ghizzi, L. Ghedin
    Mu, L.
    Guan, H.
    Almeida, K. V.
    Andrade, B. Rajo
    Zhao, J.
    Tian, P.
    Cheng, C.
    Jiang, Y.
    Driver, J.
    Queiroz, O.
    Ferraretto, L. F.
    Ogunade, I. M.
    Adesogan, A. T.
    Vyas, D.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2023, 106 (12) : 8611 - 8626