Uncertainty Quantification in Complex Simulation Models Using Ensemble Copula Coupling

被引:196
|
作者
Schefzik, Roman [1 ]
Thorarinsdottir, Thordis L. [2 ]
Gneiting, Tilmann [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Appl Math, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Norwegian Comp Ctr, N-0314 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Bayesian model averaging; empirical copula; ensemble calibration; nonhomogeneous regression; numerical weather prediction; probabilistic forecast; Schaake shuffle; Sklar's theorem; EXTENDED LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; PROBABILISTIC FORECASTS; OUTPUT STATISTICS; PRECIPITATION FORECASTS; PREDICTION SYSTEM; SKLARS THEOREM; PART I; CALIBRATION; ECMWF; REFORECASTS;
D O I
10.1214/13-STS443
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Critical decisions frequently rely on high-dimensional output from complex computer simulation models that show intricate cross-variable, spatial and temporal dependence structures, with weather and climate predictions being key examples. There is a strongly increasing recognition of the need for uncertainty quantification in such settings, for which we propose and review a general multi-stage procedure called ensemble copula coupling (ECC), proceeding as follows: 1. Generate a raw ensemble, consisting of multiple runs of the computer model that differ in the inputs or model parameters in suitable ways. 2. Apply statistical postprocessing techniques, such as Bayesian model averaging or nonhomogeneous regression, to correct for systematic errors in the raw ensemble, to obtain calibrated and sharp predictive distributions for each univariate output variable individually. 3. Draw a sample from each postprocessed predictive distribution. 4. Rearrange the sampled values in the rank order structure of the raw ensemble to obtain the BCC postprocessed ensemble. The use of ensembles and statistical postprocessing have become routine in weather forecasting over the past decade. We show that seemingly unrelated, recent advances can be interpreted, fused and consolidated within the framework of BCC, the common thread being the adoption of the empirical copula of the raw ensemble. Depending on the use of Quantiles, Random draws or Transformations at the sampling stage, we distinguish the ECC-Q, ECC-R and ECC-T variants, respectively. We also describe relations to the Schaake shuffle and extant copula-based techniques. In a case study, the ECC approach is applied to predictions of temperature, pressure, precipitation and wind over Germany, based on the 50-member European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ensemble.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 640
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uncertainty quantification of mass models using ensemble Bayesian model averaging
    Saito, Yukiya
    Dillmann, I.
    Krucken, R.
    Mumpower, M. R.
    Surman, R.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2024, 109 (05)
  • [2] Proper orthogonal decompositions in multifidelity uncertainty quantification of complex simulation models
    Roderick, Oleg
    Anitescu, Mihai
    Peet, Yulia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER MATHEMATICS, 2014, 91 (04) : 748 - 769
  • [3] Coupling Visualization, Simulation, and Deep Learning for Ensemble Steering of Complex Energy Models
    Bush, Brian
    Brunhart-Lupo, Nicholas
    Bugbee, Bruce
    Krishnan, Venkat
    Potter, Kristin
    Gruchalla, Kenny
    [J]. 2017 IEEE WORKSHOP ON DATA SYSTEMS FOR INTERACTIVE ANALYSIS (DSIA), 2017,
  • [4] Probabilistic and ensemble simulation approaches for input uncertainty quantification of artificial neural network hydrological models
    Kasiviswanathan, K. S.
    Sudheer, K. P.
    He, Jianxun
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2018, 63 (01): : 101 - 113
  • [5] Methods for the Uncertainty Quantification of Aircraft Simulation Models
    Rosic, Bojana V.
    Diekmann, Jobst H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2015, 52 (04): : 1247 - 1255
  • [6] Fed-ensemble: Ensemble Models in Federated Learning for Improved Generalization and Uncertainty Quantification
    Shi, Naichen
    Lai, Fan
    Al Kontar, Raed
    Chowdhury, Mosharaf
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, : 1 - 0
  • [7] Uncertainty quantification for the family-wise error rate in multivariate copula models
    Jens Stange
    Taras Bodnar
    Thorsten Dickhaus
    [J]. AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 2015, 99 : 281 - 310
  • [8] Uncertainty quantification for the family-wise error rate in multivariate copula models
    Stange, Jens
    Bodnar, Taras
    Dickhaus, Thorsten
    [J]. ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 99 (03) : 281 - 310
  • [9] Uncertainty quantification for industrial numerical simulation using dictionaries of reduced order models
    Daniel, Thomas
    Casenave, Fabien
    Akkari, Nissrine
    Ryckelynck, David
    Rey, Christian
    [J]. MECHANICS & INDUSTRY, 2022, 23
  • [10] Uncertainty quantification for hydrological models based on neural networks: the dropout ensemble
    Althoff, Daniel
    Rodrigues, Lineu Neiva
    Bazame, Helizani Couto
    [J]. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2021, 35 (05) : 1051 - 1067