Image Contrast of Line-Cut/Contact Hole Features in Complementary E-Beam Lithography (CEBL)

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Enden D. [1 ]
Tran, Cong [1 ]
Lam, David K. [1 ]
Prescop, Ted [1 ]
机构
[1] Multibeam Corp, Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA
来源
关键词
E-Beam Lithography; CEBL; Line-Cut; Contact Hole; Proximity Effect; Image Contrast; 20; nm;
D O I
10.1117/12.2011204
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Image contrast of line-cut and contact hole features patterned using Complementary E-Beam Lithography (CEBL) at advanced technology nodes are analyzed. The study assumes one beam in each column is used to pattern features less than 20 nm (Full Width Half Maximum, FWHM), consistent with Multibeam's multi-column vector-scan approach for CEBL patterning. When the feature size approaches the resolution of the e-beam column design, the dose intensity profile follows a Gaussian model. Using Gaussian profiles, the image contrast of line cut or contact hole features can be studied as a function of beam FWHM size, spacing between features, and proximity effect. As expected, the image contrast was dominated by contact hole stepping distance (i.e., spacing between neighboring contact holes) and proximity effect. The plot of image contrast versus contact position becomes very useful in studying the impact of contact spacing, proximity effect and process window in writing line-cut or contact features in CEBL applications. Based on a given design rule of contact hole size and spacing, we can determine the appropriate e-beam size and resist contrast to achieve good image contrast. The relationship between resist contrast and image contrast is discussed to estimate the process window in CEBL applications. Finally, the impact of electron forward scattering in resist is analyzed, including the effects of resist thickness and beam voltage selections. We determined that the influence of back scattered electrons is not a significant factor in CEBL applications when feature pattern density is less than 11%.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Multiple Columns for High Throughput Complementary E-Beam Lithography (CEBL)
    Liu, Enden D.
    Cong Tran
    Prescop, Ted
    Lam, David K.
    ALTERNATIVE LITHOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES IV, 2012, 8323
  • [2] Analysis of Multibeam's Scalable Column for Complementary E-Beam Lithography (CEBL)
    Liu, Enden D.
    Cong Tran
    Prescop, Ted
    Lam, David K.
    ALTERNATIVE LITHOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES IV, 2012, 8323
  • [3] Predicted effect of shot noise on contact hole dimension in e-beam lithography
    Kruit, P.
    Steenbrink, S.
    Wieland, M.
    JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 2006, 24 (06): : 2931 - 2935
  • [4] Feasibility Study of Optical/E-Beam Complementary Lithography
    Hohle, Christoph
    Choi, Kang-Hoon
    Freitag, Martin
    Gutsch, Manuela
    Jaschinsky, Philipp
    Kahlenberg, Frank
    Klein, Christof
    Klikovits, Jan
    Paul, Jan
    Rudolph, Matthias
    Thrun, Xaver
    ALTERNATIVE LITHOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES IV, 2012, 8323
  • [5] E-beam Direct Write (EBDW) as Complementary Lithography
    Lam, David
    Liu, Dave
    Prescop, Ted
    PHOTOMASK TECHNOLOGY 2010, 2010, 7823
  • [6] An electronic image adjustment device for e-beam lithography
    Waskiewicz, WK
    CHARGED-PARTICLE OPTICS II, 1996, 2858 : 156 - 165
  • [7] Dose latitude dependency on resist contrast in e-beam mask lithography
    Cha, BC
    Moon, SY
    Ki, WT
    Yang, SH
    Choi, SW
    Han, WS
    Yoon, HS
    Sohn, JM
    PHOTOMASK AND NEXT-GENERATION LITHOGRAPHY MASK TECHNOLOGY VII, 2000, 4066 : 200 - 209
  • [8] An information theoretic perspective on e-beam direct-write as complementary lithography
    Savari, Serap A.
    JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 2014, 32 (06):
  • [9] Large format grating image hologram based on e-beam lithography
    Huang, MJ
    Yeh, SL
    Lee, CK
    Huang, TK
    PRACTICAL HOLOGRAPHY X, 1996, 2652 : 117 - 123
  • [10] Self-aligned Double Patterning Layout Decomposition with Complementary E-Beam Lithography
    Gao, Jhih-Rong
    Yu, Bei
    Pan, David Z.
    2014 19TH ASIA AND SOUTH PACIFIC DESIGN AUTOMATION CONFERENCE (ASP-DAC), 2014, : 143 - 148