Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of Rhinovirus and Influenza Virus Infection

被引:17
|
作者
Dissanayake, Thrimendra Kaushika [1 ]
Schaeuble, Sascha [2 ]
Mirhakkak, Mohammad [2 ]
Wu, Wai-Lan [1 ]
Ng, Anthony Chin-Ki [1 ]
Yip, Cyril C. Y. [1 ]
Lopez, Albert Garcia [2 ]
Yeung, Man-Lung [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Chan, Kwok-Hung [1 ]
Yuen, Kwok-Yung [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Panagiotou, Gianni [2 ,6 ]
To, Kelvin Kai-Wang [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Microbiol, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Leibniz Inst Nat Prod Res & Infect Biol, Hans Knoll Inst, Syst Biol & Bioinformat Unit, Jena, Germany
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, State Key Lab Emerging Infect Dis, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Clin Microbiol & Infect Control, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Hong Kong, Carol Yu Ctr Infect, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Sci, Sch Biol Sci, Syst Biol & Bioinformat Grp, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY | 2020年 / 11卷
关键词
influenza; rhinovirus; transcriptomics analysis; ICAM5; interferons; cytokines; ENRICHMENT ANALYSIS; ANTIVIRAL RESPONSE; KAPPA-B; EXPRESSION; PNEUMONIA; RECEPTOR; POTENT; H7N9; IFN;
D O I
10.3389/fmicb.2020.01580
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Rhinovirus (RV) and influenza virus are the most frequently detected respiratory viruses among adult patients with community acquired pneumonia. Previous clinical studies have identified major differences in the clinical presentations and inflammatory or immune response during these infections. A systematic transcriptomic analysis directly comparing influenza and RV is lacking. Here, we sought to compare the transcriptomic response to these viral infections. Human airway epithelial Calu-3 cells were infected with contemporary clinical isolates of RV, influenza A virus (IAV), or influenza B virus (IBV). Host gene expression was determined using RNA-seq. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with respect to mock-infected cells were identified using the overlapping gene-set of four different statistical models. Transcriptomic analysis showed that RV-infected cells have a more blunted host response with fewer DEGs than IAV or IBV-infected cells. IFNL1 and CXCL10 were among the most upregulated DEGs during RV, IAV, and IBV infection. Other DEGs that were highly expressed for all 3 viruses were mainly genes related to type I or type III interferons (RSAD2, IDO1) and chemokines (CXCL11). Notably, ICAM5, a known receptor for enterovirus D68, was highly expressed during RV infection only. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) confirmed that pathways associated with interferon response, innate immunity, or regulation of inflammatory response, were most perturbed for all three viruses. Network analysis showed that steroid-related pathways were enriched. Taken together, our data using contemporary virus strains suggests that genes related to interferon and chemokine predominated the host response associated with RV, IAV, and IBV infection. Several highly expressed genes, especially ICAM5 which is preferentially-induced during RV infection, deserve further investigation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of Rhinovirus and Influenza Virus Infection (vol 11, 1580, 2020)
    Dissanayake, Thrimendra Kaushika
    Schaeuble, Sascha
    Mirhakkak, Mohammad Hassan
    Wu, Wai-Lan
    Ng, Anthony Chin-Ki
    Yip, Cyril C. Y.
    Lopez, Albert Garcia
    Wolf, Thomas
    Yeung, Man-Lung
    Chan, Kwok-Hung
    Yuen, Kwok-Yung
    Panagiotou, Gianni
    To, Kelvin Kai-Wang
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [2] Interference between rhinovirus and influenza A virus: a clinical data analysis and experimental infection study
    Wu, Anchi
    Mihaylova, Valia T.
    Landry, Marie L.
    Foxman, Ellen F.
    LANCET MICROBE, 2020, 1 (06): : E254 - E262
  • [3] A systems approach to understanding human rhinovirus and influenza virus infection
    Kim, Taek-Kyun
    Bheda-Malge, Anjali
    Lin, Yakang
    Sreekrishna, Koti
    Adams, Rachel
    Robinson, Michael K.
    Bascom, Charles C.
    Tiesman, Jay P.
    Isfort, Robert J.
    Gelinas, Richard
    VIROLOGY, 2015, 486 : 146 - 157
  • [4] Comparative analysis of mortality in patients admitted with an infection with influenza A/B virus, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus, metapneumovirus or SARS-CoV-2
    Boon, Hanneke
    Meinders, Arend-Jan
    van Hannen, Erik Jan
    Tersmette, Matthijs
    Schaftenaar, Erik
    INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [5] TRANSCRIPTOMIC ANALYSIS OF HEALTHY PRIMARY TISSUE RESPONSE TO RHINOVIRUS INFECTION
    Ling, K.
    Garratt, L.
    Lassmann, T.
    Kicic, A.
    Stick, S.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2018, 23 : 187 - 187
  • [6] Comprehensive Transcriptomic Analysis Identifies Novel Antiviral Factors Against Influenza A Virus Infection
    Zhou, Ao
    Dong, Xia
    Liu, Mengyun
    Tang, Bin
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [7] Comparative in vitro analysis of inhibition of rhinovirus and influenza virus replication by mucoactive secretolytic agents and plant extracts
    Walther, Christin
    Doering, Kristin
    Schmidtke, Michaela
    BMC COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE AND THERAPIES, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [8] Comparative in vitro analysis of inhibition of rhinovirus and influenza virus replication by mucoactive secretolytic agents and plant extracts
    Christin Walther
    Kristin Döring
    Michaela Schmidtke
    BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 20
  • [9] Suppression of influenza virus infection by rhinovirus interference - at the population, individual and cellular levels
    Tao, Kin P.
    Chong, Marc K. C.
    Chan, Kathy Y. Y.
    Pun, Jason C. S.
    Tsun, Joseph G. S.
    Chow, Samuel M. W.
    Ng, Calvin S. H.
    Wang, Maggie H. T.
    Chan, Paul K. S.
    Li, Albert M.
    Chan, Renee W. Y.
    CURRENT RESEARCH IN MICROBIAL SCIENCES, 2022, 3
  • [10] Bradykinin levels during experimental nasal infection with rhinovirus and attenuated influenza virus
    Shibayama, Y
    Skoner, D
    Suehiro, S
    Konishi, JE
    Fireman, P
    Kaplan, AP
    IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 33 (1-3): : 311 - 313