Technology-enhanced Simulation in Emergency Medicine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:123
|
作者
Ilgen, Jonathan S. [1 ]
Sherbino, Jonathan [2 ]
Cook, David A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Emergency Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Div Emergency Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Mayo Med Sch, Off Educ Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Div Gen Internal Med, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
HEALTH-PROFESSIONS EDUCATION; DELIBERATE PRACTICE; SKILL RETENTION; FIDELITY; QUALITY; MANNEQUIN; SCENARIO; FEATURES; PROGRAM; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/acem.12076
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives Technology-enhanced simulation is used frequently in emergency medicine (EM) training programs. Evidence for its effectiveness, however, remains unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation for training in EM and identify instructional design features associated with improved outcomes by conducting a systematic review. Methods The authors systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsychINFO, Scopus, key journals, and previous review bibliographies through May 2011. Original research articles in any language were selected if they compared simulation to no intervention or another educational activity for the purposes of training EM health professionals (including student and practicing physicians, midlevel providers, nurses, and prehospital providers). Reviewers evaluated study quality and abstracted information on learners, instructional design (curricular integration, feedback, repetitive practice, mastery learning), and outcomes. Results From a collection of 10,903 articles, 85 eligible studies enrolling 6,099 EM learners were identified. Of these, 56 studies compared simulation to no intervention, 12 compared simulation with another form of instruction, and 19 compared two forms of simulation. Effect sizes were pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity among these studies was large (I250%). Among studies comparing simulation to no intervention, pooled effect sizes were large (range=1.13 to 1.48) for knowledge, time, and skills and small to moderate for behaviors with patients (0.62) and patient effects (0.43; all p<0.02 except patient effects p=0.12). Among comparisons between simulation and other forms of instruction, the pooled effect sizes were small (0.33) for knowledge, time, and process skills (all p>0.1). Qualitative comparisons of different simulation curricula are limited, although feedback, mastery learning, and higher fidelity were associated with improved learning outcomes. Conclusions Technology-enhanced simulation for EM learners is associated with moderate or large favorable effects in comparison with no intervention and generally small and nonsignificant benefits in comparison with other instruction. Future research should investigate the features that lead to effective simulation-based instructional design. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2013; 20:117-127 (C) 2013 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 127
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Technology-enhanced simulation in emergency medicine: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis 1991-2021
    Hildreth, Amy F.
    Maggio, Lauren A.
    Iteen, Alex
    Wojahn, Amanda L.
    Cook, David A.
    Battista, Alexis
    AEM EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2023, 7 (02)
  • [2] Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cheng, Adam
    Eppich, Walter
    Grant, Vincent
    Sherbino, Jonathan
    Zendejas, Benjamin
    Cook, David A.
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2014, 48 (07) : 657 - 666
  • [3] Technology-Enhanced Simulation for Health Professions Education A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Cook, David A.
    Hatala, Rose
    Brydges, Ryan
    Zendejas, Benjamin
    Szostek, Jason H.
    Wang, Amy T.
    Erwin, Patricia J.
    Hamstra, Stanley J.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 306 (09): : 978 - 988
  • [4] Mastery Learning for Health Professionals Using Technology-Enhanced Simulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cook, David A.
    Brydges, Ryan
    Zendejas, Benjamin
    Hamstra, Stanley J.
    Hatala, Rose
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2013, 88 (08) : 1178 - 1186
  • [5] Technology-Enhanced Simulation and Pediatric Education: A Meta-analysis
    Cheng, Adam
    Lang, Tara R.
    Starr, Stephanie R.
    Pusic, Martin
    Cook, David A.
    PEDIATRICS, 2014, 133 (05) : E1313 - E1323
  • [6] Technology-enhanced simulation for healthcare professionals: A meta-analysis
    Mitchell, Aaron A.
    Ivimey-Cook, Edward R.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [7] Comparative Effectiveness of Technology-Enhanced Simulation Versus Other Instructional Methods A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cook, David A.
    Brydges, Ryan
    Hamstra, Stanley J.
    Zendejas, Benjamin
    Szostek, Jason H.
    Wang, Amy T.
    Erwin, Patricia J.
    Hatala, Rose
    SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2012, 7 (05): : 308 - 320
  • [8] Effectiveness of technology-enhanced learning in Endodontic education: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nagendrababu, V.
    Pulikkotil, S. J.
    Sultan, O. S.
    Jayaraman, J.
    Soh, J. A.
    Dummer, P. M. H.
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2019, 52 (02) : 181 - 192
  • [9] Burnout in emergency medicine physicians A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Zhang, Qin
    Mu, Ming-chun
    He, Yan
    Cai, Zhao-lun
    Li, Zheng-chi
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (32) : E21462
  • [10] Technology-Enhanced CT: A Systematic Review
    Sonmez, Elif
    THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2021, 41