Healthcare decision-making applications using multicriteria decision analysis: A scoping review

被引:43
|
作者
Glaize, Annabelle [1 ]
Duenas, Alejandra [2 ]
Di Martinelly, Christine [1 ]
Fagnot, Isabelle [3 ]
机构
[1] IESEG Sch Management, LEM CNRS UMR 9221, Management Dept, Lille, France
[2] CERFIGE, ICN Business Sch, Business Environm, Nancy, France
[3] Audencia Business Sch, Management Dept, Nantes, France
关键词
applications; healthcare areas; MCDA; methods; multicriteria decision analysis; scoping review; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; BENEFIT-RISK-ASSESSMENT; DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENT; MULTIPLE CRITERIA; ANALYSIS MCDA; TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; EVIDEM FRAMEWORK; CANCER-TREATMENT; RARE DISEASES; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1002/mcda.1659
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The objective of this study is to review applications of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods to provide structure for and practical insights on how MCDA methods are applied in different healthcare areas. Four databases (Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and PubMed) were searched from 1980 to February 7, 2018. A scoping review was performed to outline the most frequently applied MCDA methods, in which only case studies were considered, as the objective was to assess the applications of MCDA methods. Seventy case studies were selected. The review showed that the first real-life application was published in 1990. With regard to areas of application, three aspects were analysed: type of health services (public or private), type of intervention (preventive, diagnostic, or treatment), and healthcare area (policymaking; resource allocation; health technology assessment; pharmaceutics; and hospital, clinical, or patient level). Data revealed that MCDA was principally used in public health services (n = 59). Three types of interventions were identified: prevention (n = 36), diagnosis (n = 32), and treatment (n = 2). An MCDA process of application was then followed to provide practical insights. During the problem-structuring phase, results showed that processes for selecting stakeholders and criteria differed among healthcare areas. For model building, authors preferred value measurement methods and especially the analytical hierarchy process. Authors of the 70 case studies included and confirmed the usefulness of MCDA in different healthcare contexts. The stakeholders, criteria, and MCDA methods chosen differ from one study to another, answering different research objectives in different healthcare areas. This scoping review highlights the importance of each MCDA step (using Belton and Stewart's framework), from problem structuring (including the selection of stakeholders) to the model building phase (encompassing the selection of the appropriate MCDA method). We recommend structured and justified analysis so that decision makers and stakeholders can feel confident during the application process in order to make final decisions more meaningful. Further work is needed to help researchers and decision makers when choosing a suitable MCDA method.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 83
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitivity analysis in multicriteria spatial decision-making: A review
    Delgado, MG
    Sendra, JB
    [J]. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2004, 10 (06): : 1173 - 1187
  • [2] Shared decision-making in healthcare in mainland China: a scoping review
    Li, Xuejing
    Yang, Dan
    Meng, Meiqi
    Zhao, Junqiang
    Yin, Yiyi
    Wang, Hefang
    Zhang, Xiaoyan
    Liu, Qian
    Li, Mengdi
    Liu, Jianping
    Hao, Yufang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [3] MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    HENDRIKS, MMWB
    DEBOER, JH
    SMILDE, AK
    DOORNBOS, DA
    [J]. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1992, 16 (03) : 175 - 191
  • [4] PATIENT EMPOWERMENT FOR HEALTHCARE DECISION-MAKING ASSESSING ONCOLOGY INNOVATION THROUGH MULTICRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS
    Aguaron, A.
    Fernandez, A.
    Gimon, A.
    Nafria, B.
    Gaspar, B.
    Guarga, L.
    Galvez, M.
    Fuentes, M.
    Saldana, R.
    Badia, X.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A451 - A451
  • [5] Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: A Literature Review
    Cengiz Kahraman
    Sezi Cevik Onar
    Basar Oztaysi
    [J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2015, 8 : 637 - 666
  • [6] Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: A Literature Review
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    Onar, Sezi Cevik
    Oztaysi, Basar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2015, 8 (04) : 637 - 666
  • [7] Sustainability of knowledge translation interventions in healthcare decision-making: a scoping review
    Andrea C. Tricco
    Huda M. Ashoor
    Roberta Cardoso
    Heather MacDonald
    Elise Cogo
    Monika Kastner
    Laure Perrier
    Ann McKibbon
    Jeremy M. Grimshaw
    Sharon E. Straus
    [J]. Implementation Science, 11
  • [8] Sustainability of knowledge translation interventions in healthcare decision-making: a scoping review
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Ashoor, Huda M.
    Cardoso, Roberta
    MacDonald, Heather
    Cogo, Elise
    Kastner, Monika
    Perrier, Laure
    McKibbon, Ann
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Straus, Sharon E.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2016, 11
  • [9] More work needed on decision analysis for shared decision-making: A scoping review
    Humphries, Brittany
    Leon-Garcia, Montserrat
    Quispe, Ena Nino de Guzman
    Canelo-Aybar, Carlos
    Valli, Claudia
    Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin
    Agarwal, Arnav
    Mirabi, Susan
    Eckman, Mark H.
    Guyatt, Gordon
    Bates, Shannon M.
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    Xie, Feng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 141 : 106 - 120
  • [10] Multicriteria Decision-Making in Diabetes Management and Decision Support: Systematic Review
    Aldaghi, Tahmineh
    Muzik, Jan
    [J]. JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 12