Measurement of Cloud Top Height: Comparison of MODIS and Ground-Based Millimeter Radar

被引:11
|
作者
Huo, Juan [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jie [2 ,3 ]
Duan, Minzheng [1 ,2 ]
Lv, Daren [1 ,2 ]
Han, Congzheng [1 ,2 ]
Bi, Yongheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, Key Lab Middle Atmospher & Global Environm Observ, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, State Key Lab Atmospher Boundary Layer Phys & Atm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
cloud top height; MODIS; radar; accuracy; validation; SATELLITE; PRESSURE; RADIATION; SOUNDER; SURFACE; SYSTEM; ISCCP; MISR;
D O I
10.3390/rs12101616
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Cloud top height (CTH) is an essential pareter for the general circulation model in understanding the impact of clouds on the Earth's radiation budget and global climate change. This paper compares the CTH products, derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), onboard the Aqua and Terra satellites with ground-based Ka band radar data in Beijing from 2014 to 2017. The aim was to investigate the data accuracy and the difference in CTH measurements between passive satellite data and active ground-based radar data. The results show that MODIS, on average, underestimates CTH relative to radar by -1.08 +/- 2.48 km, but with a median difference of -0.65 km and about 48% of differences are within 1 km. Statistically, MODIS CTHs which are greater than 6 km show lower discrepancy to radar CTH than those of MODIS CTHs less than 4 km. The CTH difference is independent of cloud fraction and cloud layer. It shows strong dependence on cloud depth, decreasing as cloud depth increases. There is a tendency for MODIS to underestimate high thin clouds but overestimate low thin clouds relative to radar. Total ozone, SO2, CO, NO2, aerosol PM10, total water vapor and temperature inversion show unobvious influences in the CTH discrepancy. It is shown that the MODIS CO2-slicing technique performs much better than IRW (infrared window) technique when cloud layer is higher than 2 km. The average difference calculated from all comparisons by CO2-slicing technique and IRW technique is 0.09 +/- 1.58 km, and -2.20 +/- 2.73 km, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF MODIS CLOUD MASK PRODUCTS WITH GROUND-BASED MILLIMETER-WAVE RADAR
    Huo, Juan
    Han, Congzheng
    [J]. IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2020, : 5329 - 5332
  • [2] Cloud-Top Height Comparison from Multi-Satellite Sensors and Ground-Based Cloud Radar over SACOL Site
    Yang, Xuan
    Ge, Jinming
    Hu, Xiaoyu
    Wang, Meihua
    Han, Zihang
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [3] Assessment of FY-4A and Himawari-8 Cloud Top Height Retrieval through Comparison with Ground-Based Millimeter Radar at Sites in Tibet and Beijing
    Liu, Bo
    Huo, Juan
    Lyu, Daren
    Wang, Xin
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2021, 38 (08) : 1334 - 1350
  • [4] Assessment of FY-4A and Himawari-8 Cloud Top Height Retrieval through Comparison with Ground-Based Millimeter Radar at Sites in Tibet and Beijing
    Bo Liu
    Juan Huo
    Daren Lyu
    Xin Wang
    [J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2021, 38 : 1334 - 1350
  • [5] Assessment of FY-4A and Himawari-8 Cloud Top Height Retrieval through Comparison with Ground-Based Millimeter Radar at Sites in Tibet and Beijing
    Bo LIU
    Juan HUO
    Daren LYU
    Xin WANG
    [J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2021, 38 (08) : 1334 - 1350
  • [6] Comparison of the cloud top heights retrieved from MODIS and AHI satellite data with ground-based Ka-band radar
    Huo, Juan
    Lu, Daren
    Duan, Shu
    Bi, Yongheng
    Liu, Bo
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2020, 13 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [7] Cloud-base height derived from a ground-based infrared sensor and a comparison with a collocated cloud radar
    [J]. Wang, Zhe (wzhe1124@126.com), 1600, American Meteorological Society (35):
  • [8] Cloud-Base Height Derived from a Ground-Based Infrared Sensor and a Comparison with a Collocated Cloud Radar
    Wang, Zhe
    Wang, Zhenhui
    Cao, Xiaozhong
    Mao, Jiajia
    Tao, Fa
    Hu, Shuzhen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 35 (04) : 689 - 704
  • [9] Comparison of Cloud Base Height Derived from a Ground-Based Infrared Cloud Measurement and Two Ceilometers
    Liu, Lei
    Sun, Xue-jin
    Liu, Xi-chuan
    Gao, Tai-chang
    Zhao, Shi-jun
    [J]. ADVANCES IN METEOROLOGY, 2015, 2015
  • [10] Intercomparison of Ground-Based Radar and Satellite Cloud-Top Height Retrievals for Overcast Single-Layered Cloud Fields
    Kokhanovsky, Alexander A.
    Naud, Catherine M.
    Devasthale, Abhay
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2009, 47 (07): : 1901 - 1908