A randomised, controlled trial of the effects of a mobile telehealth intervention on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in people with poorly controlled diabetes

被引:36
|
作者
Baron, Justine S. [1 ,2 ]
Hirani, Shashivadan [3 ]
Newman, Stanton P. [3 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Cardiovasc Sci, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Ottawa Hosp, Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] City Univ London, Sch Hlth Sci, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, London, England
关键词
Telehealth; mobile health; randomised; controlled trial; patient-reported outcomes; glycosylated haemoglobin; OF-THE-LITERATURE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HOME-TELEHEALTH; SELF-MANAGEMENT; TELEMEDICINE; METAANALYSIS; CARE; MELLITUS; ADULTS; TELECARE;
D O I
10.1177/1357633X16631628
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The objective of this research is to determine the effects of mobile telehealth (MTH) on glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and other clinical and patient-reported outcomes in insulin-requiring people with diabetes. Methods: A nine-month randomised, controlled trial compared standard care to standard care supplemented with MTH (self-monitoring, mobile-phone data transmissions, graphical and nurse-initiated feedback, and educational calls). Clinical (HbA1c, blood pressure, daily insulin dose, diabetes outpatient appointments (DOAs)) and questionnaire data (health-related quality of life, depression, anxiety) were collected. Mean group changes over time were compared using hierarchical linear models and Mann-Whitney tests. Results: Eighty-one participants with a baseline HbA1c of 8.98% +/- 1.82 were randomised to the intervention (n = 45) and standard care (n = 36). The Group by Time effect revealed MTH did not significantly influence HbA1c (p = 0.228), but p values were borderline significant for blood pressure (p = 0.054) and mental-health related quality of life (p = 0.057). Examination of effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals for mean group differences at nine months supported the existence of a protective effect of MTH on mental health-related quality of life as well as depression. None of the other measured outcomes were found to be affected by the MTH intervention. Conclusions: Findings from this study must be interpreted with caution given the small sample size, but they do not support the widespread adoption of MTH to achieve clinically significant changes in HbA1c. MTH may, however, have positive effects on blood pressure and protective effects on some aspects of mental health.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 216
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical diabetes consultations: the DiaPROM randomised controlled pilot trial
    Hernar, Ingvild
    Graue, Marit
    Richards, David A.
    Strandberg, Ragnhild B.
    Nilsen, Roy Miodini
    Rekdal, Magne
    Lovaas, Karianne Fjeld
    Madsen, Tone, V
    Tell, Grethe S.
    Haugstvedt, Anne
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (04):
  • [2] Effects of educational intervention on mortality and patient-reported outcomes in individuals with heart failure: A randomized controlled trial
    Hwang, Boyoung
    Huh, Iksoo
    Jeong, Yujin
    Cho, Hyun-Jai
    Lee, Hae-Young
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (08) : 2740 - 2746
  • [3] Outcomes of a Mobile App to Monitor Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lee, Yvonne C.
    Lu, Fengxin
    Colls, Joshua
    Luo, Dee
    Wang, Penny
    Dunlop, Dorothy D.
    Muhammad, Lutfiyya N.
    Song, Jing
    Michaud, Kaleb
    Solomon, Daniel H.
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 73 (08) : 1421 - 1429
  • [4] Impact of hospital pharmacist-delivered individualised pharmaceutical service intervention on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients with hypertension: a randomised controlled trial
    Paudel, Nabina
    Shrestha, Shakti
    Marasine, Nirmal Raj
    Khanal, Pitambar
    Aryal, Sushant
    Erku, Daniel
    Poudel, Arjun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2023, 30 (06) : 316 - 321
  • [5] Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review
    Newman, Christine
    Kgosidialwa, Oratile
    Dervan, Louise
    Bogdanet, Delia
    Egan, Aoife Maria
    Biesty, Linda
    Devane, Declan
    O'Shea, Paula M.
    Dunne, Fidelma
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [6] Effect of detection of need for care on lung cancer patient-reported outcomes: A randomised controlled trial.
    Geerse, Olaf P.
    Hoekstra-Weebers, Josette E. H. M.
    Stokroos, Marleen H.
    Groen, Harry J. M.
    Kerstjens, Huib A. M.
    Hiltermann, Thijo Jeroen Nicolaas
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [7] Randomised controlled trial of a psychological, family-based intervention for patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes
    Keogh, K. M.
    White, P.
    Smith, S.
    McGillowa, S.
    O'Dowd, T.
    Gibney, J.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2009, 24 : 229 - 230
  • [8] The FamilyTalk randomized controlled trial: patient-reported outcomes in clinical genetic sequencing for colorectal cancer
    Sukh Makhnoon
    Deborah J. Bowen
    Brian H. Shirts
    Stephanie M. Fullerton
    Eric B. Larson
    James D. Ralston
    Kathleen A. Leppig
    David R. Crosslin
    David Veenstra
    Gail P. Jarvik
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2021, 32 : 483 - 492
  • [9] The FamilyTalk randomized controlled trial: patient-reported outcomes in clinical genetic sequencing for colorectal cancer
    Makhnoon, Sukh
    Bowen, Deborah J.
    Shirts, Brian H.
    Fullerton, Stephanie M.
    Larson, Eric B.
    Ralston, James D.
    Leppig, Kathleen A.
    Crosslin, David R.
    Veenstra, David
    Jarvik, Gail P.
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2021, 32 (05) : 483 - 492
  • [10] When Using Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Practice, the Measure Matters: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Snyder, Claire F.
    Herman, Joseph M.
    White, Sharon M.
    Luber, Brandon S.
    Blackford, Amanda L.
    Carducci, Michael A.
    Wu, Albert W.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2014, 10 (05) : E299 - E306