Cost modeling approach and economic analysis of biomass gasification integrated solid oxide fuel cell systems

被引:7
|
作者
Kempegowda, Rajesh S. [1 ]
Skreiberg, Oyvind [2 ]
Khanh-Quang Tran [1 ]
机构
[1] NTNU, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] SINTEF Energy Res, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
POWER; ENERGY; OPTIMIZATION; COMBUSTION; CHP;
D O I
10.1063/1.4737920
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents a cost modeling approach and the economic feasibility for selected plant configurations operating under three modes: air gasification, mixed air-steam gasification, and steam gasification combined cycle solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) systems. In this study, three cases of biomass gasification integrated SOFC without combined cycle (base case 1) are compared with biomass gasification integrated SOFC-gas turbine (GT) with heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) hybrid configuration (case 2) and biomass gasification integrated SOFC-steam turbine (ST) cycle (case 3) for biomass feed stock. The plant design cases of integrated biomass gasification processes, SOFC, and combined cycles are investigated primarily employing ASPEN PLUS (TM) flow sheeting models. Based on the mass and energy balance results of the system simulations, the economic model calculates the size and cost estimates for the plant configuration equipments. Detailed purchase cost estimations for each piece of equipments and the corresponding total bare module cost were established based on the bare module factor, and the total direct permanent investment were established. The calculated direct permanent investment was used for economic feasibility analysis of the cogeneration plant configuration. The economic feasibility decision parameters, such as purchase cost estimations, total specific plant cost per kW, the financial net present value (FNPV), internal rate of return, and benefit to cost ratio for the system configurations were compared for three design cases. The results shows that the cost of the steam gasification system is shown to be highest compared to the mixed air steam gasification system and air gasification system due to the higher hydrogen production. Other than the SOFC and gasification costs, a significant cost towards the heat exchangers is about 15% to 20% of the total equipment purchase cost. The specific plant cost for the air gasification varied from the 16 600 US$/kW to 19 200 US$/kWe. For the case of biomass gasification-integrated SOFC-GT configuration, the major cost portions are shared by the SOFC, HRSG, and gasifier. The HRSG equipment shared a cost portion of 25% to 30% for all the operating modes. The cost is decreased with a similar trend as that of steam, mixed air-steam and air gasification systems. For the case of biomass gasification integrated with SOFC-ST configuration, the total equipment purchase cost decreases at a rate of 15% to 20% for both mixed air steam and air gasification system. Plant specific cost for the steam gasification mode varied from 15 200 to 17 200 US $/kW which is significantly very high. (C) 2012 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4737920]
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Thermodynamic modeling of an integrated biomass gasification and solid oxide fuel cell system
    Jia, Junxi
    Abudula, Abuliti
    Wei, Liming
    Sun, Baozhi
    Shi, Yue
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 81 : 400 - 410
  • [2] A review on performance, economic, and environmental analyses of integrated solid oxide fuel cell and biomass gasification systems
    Erdogan, Anil
    Dursun, Beyza
    Colpan, C. Ozgur
    Ayol, Azize
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2022, 44 (04) : 8403 - 8426
  • [3] Biomass gasification integrated with a solid oxide fuel cell and Stirling engine
    Rokni, Masoud
    [J]. ENERGY, 2014, 77 : 6 - 18
  • [4] Thermal modeling and efficiency assessment of an integrated biomass gasification and solid oxide fuel cell system
    El-Emam, Rami Salah
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2015, 40 (24) : 7694 - 7706
  • [5] Biomass-integrated gasification fuel cell systems - Part 2: Economic analysis
    Nagel, Florian P.
    Schildhauer, Tilman J.
    McCaughey, Nathalie
    Biollaz, Serge M. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2009, 34 (16) : 6826 - 6844
  • [6] Effect of gasification agent on the performance of solid oxide fuel cell and biomass gasification systems
    Colpan, C. Ozgur
    Hamdullahpur, Feridun
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Yoo, Yeong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2010, 35 (10) : 5001 - 5009
  • [7] Process simulation of biomass gasification integrated with a solid oxide fuel cell stack
    Doherty, Wayne
    Reynolds, Anthony
    Kennedy, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2015, 277 : 292 - 303
  • [8] THERMO-ECONOMIC AND EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF SMALL TO MEDIUM-SCALE INTEGRATED BIOMASS GASIFICATION SOLID OXIDE FUEL CELL SYSTEMS
    Herrmann, Stephan
    Gaderer, M.
    Spliethoff, H.
    [J]. PAPERS OF THE 22ND EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2014, : 547 - 549
  • [9] Artificial Intelligence Approach in Gasification Integrated Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Cycle
    Sezer, Senem
    Kartal, Furkan
    Ozveren, Ugur
    [J]. FUEL, 2022, 311
  • [10] EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF A SOLID OXIDE FUEL CELL STACK COUPLED WITH BIOMASS GASIFICATION
    Gadsboll, Rasmus Ostergaard
    Thomsen, Jesper
    Bang-Moller, Christian
    Nygaard, Camilla
    Tomaszewski, Amrei
    Ahrenfeldt, Jesper
    Henriksen, Ulrik Birk
    [J]. PAPERS OF THE 23RD EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2015, : 555 - 561