Scientific approaches to enrichment and stereotypies in zoo animals: What's been done and where should we go next?

被引:221
|
作者
Swaisgood, RR
Shepherdson, DJ
机构
[1] Zool Soc San Diego, Conservat & Res Endangered Species, San Diego, CA 92112 USA
[2] Oregon Zoo, Portland, OR USA
关键词
enrichment; stereotypy; wellbeing; literature review; scientific method;
D O I
10.1002/zoo.20066
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The zoo scientific community was among the first to focus attention on captivity-induced stereotypic behaviors, their causes, and methods of eradication. Environmental enrichment has emerged recently as the main husbandry tool for tackling this problem. An increasing number of research publications have attempted to evaluate the effectiveness of enrichment in reducing stereotypic behavior and to develop further concepts to explain how effective enrichment works. A review and meta-analysis of this literature indicates that enrichment is a successful technique for reducing stereotypic behavior in zoo animals. Enrichment was associated with significant reduction in stereotypy performance about 53% of the time. Published enrichment and stereotypy research is lacking for most zoo species, with most studies on large, charismatic, and often endangered species, but it is unclear whether stereotypies are more prevalent in these species. In addition, problems with scientific methods and data presentation, quantitatively detailed in this work, severely limit the conclusions drawn from zoo research. Further understanding of what kinds or enrichment works and what doesn't will require greater attention to experimental design, sample size, statistical analysis, and better descriptions of enrichment properties and the form of stereotypy. We recommend that future studies focus on increasing sample size (e.g., through multi-institutional studies), appropriate repeated measures design (e.g., with multiple baseline and experimental phases), providing full statistical information about the behavioral changes observed (including standard error), and ultimately the development of a predictive science for enrichment, stereotypies, and wellbeing.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 518
页数:20
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Colorectal Cancer Control Where Have We Been and Where Should We Go Next?
    Green, Beverly B.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 178 (12) : 1658 - 1660
  • [2] Mental health stigma: What's been done? Where to go?
    Macedo, P.
    Silva, M.
    Fornelos, A.
    Figueiredo, A. R.
    Nunes, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 41 : S245 - S245
  • [3] Where Have We Been? What Has Changed? And Where Do We Need to Go Next?
    Adams, Marianna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MUSEUM EDUCATION, 2012, 37 (02) : 25 - 35
  • [4] Antitrust and Provider Collaborations: Where We've Been and What Should Be Done Now
    Leibenluft, Robert F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 2015, 40 (04) : 847 - 874
  • [5] Society planning and consensus-building in 2005: Where have we been? Where should we go next?
    Uretsky, BF
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2005, 66 (01) : 52 - 54
  • [6] A Calibrated-Validated In Vitro Method for Arsenic: What's been done-Where are we-what's Next?
    Drexler, J. W.
    Lowney, Y. W.
    Griffin, S.
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 19 (06) : S29 - S29
  • [7] Positive Affect and Health: What Do We Know and Where Next Should We Go?
    Pressman, Sarah D.
    Jenkins, Brooke N.
    Moskowitz, Judith T.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 70, 2019, 70 : 627 - 650
  • [8] The worldwide social burden of atrial fibrillation: What should be done and where do we go?
    Massimo Santini
    Renato P. Ricci
    [J]. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2006, 17 (3) : 183 - 188
  • [9] The worldwide social burden of atrial fibrillation: What should be done and where do we go?
    Santini, Massimo
    Ricci, Renato P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 17 (03) : 183 - 188
  • [10] From bench to in silico and backwards: What have we done on genetics of recurrent pregnancy loss and implantation failure and where should we go next?
    Gomes, Flavia Gobetti
    Boquett, Juliano Andre
    Kowalski, Thayne Woycinck
    Bremm, Joao Matheus
    Michels, Marcus Silva
    Pretto, Luiza
    Rockenbach, Marilia Korbes
    Vianna, Fernanda Sales Luiz
    Schuler-Faccini, Lavinia
    Sanseverino, Maria Teresa Vieira
    Fraga, Lucas Rosa
    [J]. GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2024, 46 (03)