Interdisciplinary working in public health research: a proposed good practice checklist

被引:9
|
作者
Gavens, L. [1 ]
Holmes, J. [1 ]
Buehringer, G. [2 ]
McLeod, J. [1 ]
Neumann, M. [2 ]
Lingford-Hughes, A. [3 ]
Hock, E. S. [1 ]
Meier, P. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Inst Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Dresden, Germany
[3] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Neuropsychopharmacol, London, England
关键词
methods; public health; research; RESEARCH TEAMS; TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; COLLABORATION;
D O I
10.1093/pubmed/fdx027
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Guidance on how different disciplines from the natural, behavioural and social sciences can collaborate to resolve complex public health problems is lacking. This article presents a checklist to support researchers and principle investigators to develop and implement interdisciplinary collaborations. Methods Fourteen individuals, representing 10 disciplines, participated in in-depth interviews to explore the strengths and challenges of working together on an interdisciplinary project to identify the determinants of substance use and gambling disorders, and to make recommendations for future interdisciplinary teams. Data were analysed thematically and a checklist was derived from insights offered by participants during interview and discussion among the authors on the implications of findings. Results Participants identified 18 scientific, interactional and structural strengths and challenges of interdisciplinary research. These findings were used to develop an 18-item BASICS checklist to support future interdisciplinary collaborations. The five domains of the checklist are: (i) Blueprint, (ii) Attitudes, (iii) Staffing, (iv) Interactions and (v) Core Science. Conclusion Interdisciplinary work has the potential to advance public health science but the numerous challenges should not be underestimated. Use of a checklist, such as BASICS, when planning and managing projects may help future collaborations to avoid some of the common pitfalls of interdisciplinary research.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 182
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice
    Viergever, Roderik F.
    Olifson, Sylvie
    Ghaffar, Abdul
    Terry, Robert F.
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2010, 8
  • [2] A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice
    Roderik F Viergever
    Sylvie Olifson
    Abdul Ghaffar
    Robert F Terry
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 8
  • [3] UTILIZING INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD - REPLY
    MARWELL, G
    AMES, RE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1980, 86 (02) : 371 - 372
  • [4] UTILIZING INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD - COMMENT
    SHIPPEE, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1980, 86 (02) : 367 - 371
  • [5] In Practice: Working with knowledge for the health of the public
    Newton, John
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 133 (04) : 191 - 192
  • [6] Public involvement in health research: What does 'good' look like in practice?
    Liabo K.
    Boddy K.
    Bortoli S.
    Irvine J.
    Boult H.
    Fredlund M.
    Joseph N.
    Bjornstad G.
    Morris C.
    [J]. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6 (1)
  • [7] Interdisciplinary research in public health: the 'why' and the 'how'
    Kivits, Joelle
    Ricci, Laetitia
    Minary, Laetitia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2019, 73 (12): : 1061 - 1062
  • [8] Public Health Practice Is Not Research
    Otto, Jean Lin
    Holodniy, Mark
    DeFraites, Robert F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 104 (04) : 596 - 602
  • [9] TikTok and public health: a proposed research agenda
    Zenone, Marco
    Ow, Nikki
    Barbic, Skye
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 6 (11):
  • [10] Untangling Desirable and Undesirable Variation in Public Health Practice: Accreditation and Research Working Together
    Mays, Glen P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2014, 20 (01): : 149 - 151