Hemocompatibility of Axial Versus Centrifugal Pump Technology in Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

被引:15
|
作者
Schibilsky, David [1 ]
Lenglinger, Matthias [1 ]
Avci-Adali, Meltem [1 ]
Haller, Christoph [1 ]
Walker, Tobias [1 ]
Wendel, Hans Peter [1 ]
Schlensak, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Tuebingen, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Hemocompatibility; Mechanical support; Axial flow; Centrifugal flow; Coagulation; Complement; Inflammation; BLOOD PUMP; BIOCOMPATIBILITY ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1111/aor.12544
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The hemocompatible properties of rotary blood pumps commonly used in mechanical circulatory support (MCS) are widely unknown regarding specific biocompatibility profiles of different pump technologies. Therefore, we analyzed the hemocompatibility indicating markers of an axial flow and a magnetically levitated centrifugal device within an in vitro mock loop. The HeartMate II (HM II; n=3) device and a CentriMag (CM; n=3) adult pump were investigated in a human whole blood mock loop for 360min using the MCS devices as a driving component. Blood samples were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for markers of coagulation, complement system, and inflammatory response. There was a time-dependent activation of the coagulation (thrombin-antithrombin complexes [TAT]), complement (SC5b-9), and inflammation system (polymorphonuclear [PMN] elastase) in both groups. The mean value of TAT (CM: 4.0g/L vs. 29.4g/L, P<0.001; HM II: 4.5g/L vs. 232.2g/L, P<0.05) and PMN elastase (CM: 53.4ng/mL vs. 253.8ng/mL, P<0.05; HM II: 28.0ng/mL vs. 738.8ng/mL, P<0.001) significantly increased from baseline until the end of the experiments (360min). After 360min, TAT and PMN values were significantly higher in the HM II group compared with the values in the CM adult group. The values of SC5b-9 increased from baseline to 360min in the CM group (CM: 141.8ng/mL vs. 967.9ng/mL, P<0.05) and the HM II group. However, the increase within the HM II group (97.3 vs. 2462.0, P=0.06) and the comparison of the 360-min values between CM group and HM II group did not reach significance (P=0.18). The activation of complement, coagulation, and inflammation system showed a time-dependent manner in both devices. The centrifugal CM device showed significantly lower activation of coagulation and inflammation than that of the HM II axial flow pump. Both HM II and CM have demonstrated an acceptable hemocompatibility profile in patients. However, there is a great opportunity to gain a clinical benefit by developing techniques to lower the blood surface interaction within both pump technologies and a magnetically levitated centrifugal pump design might be superior.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 728
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimization of Centrifugal Pump Characteristic Dimensions for Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
    Korakianitis, Theodosios
    Rezaienia, Mohamad A.
    Paul, Gordon M.
    Rahideh, Akbar
    Rothman, Martin T.
    Mozafari, Sahand
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2016, 62 (05) : 545 - 551
  • [2] Optimization of Axial Pump Characteristic Dimensions and Induced Hemolysis for Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
    Korakianitis, Theodosios
    Rezaienia, Mohammad Amin
    Paul, Gordon
    Avital, Eldad
    Rothman, Martin
    Mozafari, Sahand
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2018, 64 (06) : 727 - 734
  • [3] CENTRIFUGAL PUMP OR PNEUMATIC VENTRICLE FOR SHORT-TERM MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT
    DELEUZE, PH
    LIU, Y
    TIXIER, D
    OKUDE, J
    LEANDRI, J
    GOUAULT, M
    GALACTEROS, F
    CACHERA, JP
    LOISANCE, D
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 1989, 12 (05): : 327 - 332
  • [4] MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT WITH A CENTRIFUGAL PUMP AFTER OPEN-HEART-SURGERY
    ISHINO, K
    MURAKAMI, T
    KAWAKAMI, S
    DOHI, T
    IRIE, H
    NAKAYAMA, H
    SENOO, Y
    TERAMOTO, S
    [J]. ACTA MEDICA OKAYAMA, 1992, 46 (02) : 141 - 146
  • [5] Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
    Shannon, Dana
    Hallinan, William
    Massey, H. Todd
    Ackerman, Michael H.
    [J]. AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 17 (04) : 368 - 372
  • [6] CIRCULATORY SUPPORT WITH A CENTRIFUGAL PUMP AS A BRIDGE TO CARDIAC TRANSPLANTATION
    BOLMAN, RM
    COX, JL
    MARSHALL, W
    KOUCHOUKOS, N
    SPRAY, TL
    CANCE, C
    GENTON, RE
    SAFFITZ, J
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1989, 47 (01): : 108 - 112
  • [7] Cascade pump for mechanical circulatory support
    Masuzawa, Toru
    Murakami, Michiko
    [J]. Transactions of Japanese Society for Medical and Biological Engineering, 2014, 52
  • [8] BIVALIRUDIN VERSUS HEPARIN IN PATIENTS WITH TEMPORARY MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT DEVICES
    Duewell, Brittney
    Feih, Joel
    Juul, Janelle
    Rinka, Joseph
    Tawil, Justin
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48
  • [9] Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in the ICU
    Shah, Keyur B.
    Smallfield, Melissa C.
    Tang, Daniel G.
    Malhotra, Rajiv
    Cooke, Richard H.
    Kasirajan, Vigneshwar
    [J]. CHEST, 2014, 146 (03) : 848 - 857
  • [10] Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
    Patel, Chetan B.
    Rogers, Joseph G.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2011, 54 (02) : 132 - 143