The relation between firm size and R&D productivity in different technological regimes

被引:81
|
作者
Revilla, Antonio J. [1 ]
Fernandez, Zulima [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Carlos III Madrid, E-28903 Getafe, Spain
关键词
Innovation; Research & Development; Productivity; Firm size; Technological regimes; Appropriability; Cumulativeness; Technological opportunity; SCHUMPETERIAN PATTERNS; DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE; PANEL-DATA; INNOVATION; INDUSTRIES; RETURNS; DETERMINANTS; TRAJECTORIES; INVESTMENT; RESOURCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2012.06.004
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Although the relation between firm size and innovation has been much studied in the literature, theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence remain inconclusive. This paper proposes a contingent approach where the prevailing technological regime of each firm impacts on the relation between size and R&D. The study formulates four propositions concerning the moderating effects that the different dimensions of the technological regimes (conditions of appropriability, technological opportunity, and knowledge cumulativeness) may exert on the size-innovation relation. To test our arguments against the empirical evidence, we define a taxonomy of technological regimes via a sample of Spanish manufacturing firms; the effects of firm size on R&D productivity are then analyzed for each of the identified regimes. The results show that the relation between firm size and innovation depends on the technological regime. Smaller firms are favored by regimes characterized by the proximity to the science system, the use of intellectual property rights as a means of appropriation, or by low knowledge cumulativeness. Meanwhile, the innovation performance of larger firms is comparatively better in regimes with limited use of intellectual property rights and where the relationships with clients and suppliers are important sources of opportunities for innovation. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 623
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] R&D productivity and firm size: a nonlinear examination
    Tsai, KH
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2005, 25 (07) : 795 - 803
  • [2] Environmental Dynamism, Firm Size and the Economic Productivity of R&D
    Revilla, Antonio
    Fernandez, Zulima
    [J]. INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2013, 20 (06) : 503 - 522
  • [3] Is R&D Enough to Improve Firm Productivity?
    Tang, Jianmin
    Wang, Weimin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY MONITOR, 2019, 37 : 120 - 143
  • [4] Technological opportunity and productivity of R&D activities
    Fung, MK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2004, 21 (02) : 167 - 181
  • [5] Technological Opportunity and Productivity of R&D Activities
    Michael K. Fung
    [J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2004, 21 : 167 - 181
  • [6] R&D employee training, the stock of technological knowledge, and R&D productivity
    Kim, Donggyu
    Lee, Chang-Yang
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2022, 52 (05) : 801 - 819
  • [7] The differential effects of basic research on firm R&D productivity: The conditioning role of technological diversification
    Choi, Jin-Uk
    Lee, Chang-Yang
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2022, 118
  • [8] Firm size and R&D tax incentives
    Koga, T
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2003, 23 (07) : 643 - 648
  • [9] A Study on the Relationship between Different Technological Absorptive Capacities and R&D Investment in Joint R&D
    Wang Lei
    Shu Hai-bo
    Zhu Guo-ping
    [J]. 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (ICMSE), 2013, : 1975 - 1980
  • [10] R&D investments, exporting, and the evolution of firm productivity
    Aw, Bee Yan
    Roberts, Mark J.
    Xu, Daniel Y.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (02): : 451 - 456