Establishing a method of inoculum preparation for susceptibility testing of Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes

被引:71
|
作者
Santos, DA [1 ]
Barros, MES [1 ]
Hamdan, JS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Microbiol, Inst Biol Sci, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.44.1.98-101.2006
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
A total of 92 clinical isolates of dermatophytes (52 of Trichophyton rubrum and 40 of Trichophyton mentagrophytes) were selected for testing with six antifungal drugs (terbinafine, griseofulvin, clotrimazole, miconazole, isoconazole, and fluconazole) and two pairs of drug combinations (ketoconazole-cyclopiroxolamine and itraconazole-cyclopiroxolamine). Two methods of inoculum preparation for susceptibility testing were evaluated that used (i) inocula consisting only of microconidia of dermatophytes filtered in Whatman filter model 40 and (ii) unfiltered inocula consisting of hyphae and microconidia. We followed the recommendations of approved document M38-A of CLSI (formerly NCCLS) with some adaptations, including an incubation period of 7 days and an incubation temperature of 28 degrees C. Reference strains of Candida parapsilosis, Candida krusei, Trichophyton rubrum, and Trichophyton mentagrophytes were included as quality-control strains. MICs were consistently higher (usually I to 2 dilutions for drugs tested individually) when nonfiltered inocula were tested (P < 0.01) except for terbinafine. Larger MICs were seen when testing drugs with nonfiltered inocula. The curves of drug interaction were used to analyze the reproducibility of the test, and it was shown that high levels of reproducibility were achieved using the methodology that included the filtration step. The standardization of methodologies is the first step to yield reliability of susceptibility testing and to proceed with clinical laboratory studies to correlate MICs with clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 101
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] KERATINOLYTIC ACTIVITY OF TRICHOPHYTON SCHOENLEINI TRICHOPHYTON RUBRUM AND TRICHOPHYTON MENTAGROPHYTES
    WEARY, PE
    CANBY, CM
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1967, 48 (03) : 240 - +
  • [2] PROTEOLYTIC ACTIVITY OF TRICHOPHYTON RUBRUM AND TRICHOPHYTON MENTAGROPHYTES
    ASAHI, M
    MCKERROW, JH
    FUKUYAMA, K
    APODACA, J
    EPSTEIN, WL
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1984, 32 (02): : A569 - A569
  • [4] Comparison of a glucose consumption based method with the CLSI M38-A method for testing antifungal susceptibility of Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes
    Zhang Jing
    Chen Jian
    Huang Huai-qiu
    Xi Li-yan
    Lai Wei
    Xue Ru-zeng
    Zhang Xiao-hui
    Chen Rong-zhang
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 123 (14) : 1909 - 1914
  • [5] DIFFERENTIATION OF TRICHOPHYTON RUBRUM AND TRICHOPHYTON MENTAGROPHYTES BY PIGMENT PRODUCTION
    SUDMAN, MS
    SCHMITT, JA
    APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1965, 13 (02) : 290 - &
  • [6] PIGMENT PRODUCTION IN THE DIFFERENTIATION OF TRICHOPHYTON MENTAGROPHYTES AND TRICHOPHYTON RUBRUM
    BOCOBO, FC
    BENHAM, RW
    MYCOLOGIA, 1949, 41 (03) : 291 - 302
  • [7] NMR study of the galactomannans of Trichophyton mentagrophytes and Trichophyton rubrum
    Ikuta, K
    Shibata, N
    Blake, JS
    Dahl, MV
    Nelson, RD
    Hisamichi, K
    Kobayashi, H
    Suzuki, S
    Okawa, Y
    BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 323 : 297 - 305
  • [8] HAIR PERFORATION TEST FOR SEPARATION OF TRICHOPHYTON RUBRUM AND TRICHOPHYTON MENTAGROPHYTES - FACTORS INFLUENCING SUSCEPTIBILITY
    ASCHANAB.K
    THYRESSON, N
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 1964, 44 (06) : 429 - +
  • [9] DETECTION OF CONTAMINATION IN TRICHOPHYTON-RUBRUM AND TRICHOPHYTON-MENTAGROPHYTES
    FISCHER, JB
    KANE, J
    MYCOPATHOLOGIA ET MYCOLOGIA APPLICATA, 1971, 43 (02) : 169 - &
  • [10] Evaluation of the in vitro susceptibility pattern of clinical isolates of Trichophyton mentagrophytes and Trichophyton rubrum in Santiago, Chile
    Diaz Jarabran, Maria Cristina
    Diaz Gonzalez, Pablo
    Espinoza Rodriguez, Jose
    Carrillo Munoz, Alfonso Javier
    REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE MICOLOGIA, 2015, 32 (02): : 83 - 87