Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract compared with advancement flap for complex anorectal fistulas requiring initial seton drainage

被引:103
|
作者
Mushaya, Chrispen [2 ,3 ]
Bartlett, Lynne [1 ]
Schulze, Bettina [2 ,3 ]
Ho, Yik-Hong [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Sch Publ Hlth Trop Med & Rehabil Sci, N Queensland Ctr Canc Res, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[2] James Cook Univ, N Queensland Ctr Canc Res, Australian Inst Trop Med, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[3] Sch Med, Dept Surg, Townsville, Qld, Australia
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 2012年 / 204卷 / 03期
关键词
Complex anorectal fistulas; Preliminary seton drainage; SPHINCTER-SAVING TECHNIQUE; ANAL FISTULAS; IN-ANO; REPAIR; FISTULECTOMY; INJURIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.10.025
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) is a relatively new surgical technique for treating complex anorectal fistulas. METHODS: LIFT was compared with anorectal advancement flap management (ARAF) of complex anorectal fistulas requiring previous seton drainage. Crohn's patients were excluded. Patients with no confirmed recurrent sepsis after 6 months were randomized to day surgery performance of LIFT (25; 17 male) or ARAF (14; 10 male) with removal of the seton. Outcome measures included recurrences, surgical time, complications, hospital readmissions, and fecal incontinence. RESULTS: LIFT was 32.5 minutes shorter than ARAF (P < .001). Complications were similar, with no hospital readmissions. Return to normal activities was 1 week for LIFT patients, 2 weeks for ARAF patients (P = .016). At 19 months there were 3 recurrences (2 in the LIFT group). One ARAF patient had minor incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: The LIFT procedure was simple, safe, shorter, and patients returned to work earlier. All patients had preliminary seton drainage, possibly contributing to the low recurrence rates. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:283 / 289
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条