Robust 1D inversion and analysis of helicopter electromagnetic (HEM) data

被引:22
|
作者
Tolboll, RJ [1 ]
Christensen, NB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aarhus, Dept Earth Sci, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1190/1.2187752
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Ground-based electrical and electromagnetic methods are used systematically for quantitative hydrogeologic investigations in Denmark. In recent years, a desire for faster and more cost-efficient methods has led to growing interest in the possibility of using airborne systems, and in 2001 a number of test flights were performed using a frequency-domain, helicopter-borne electromagnetic (HEM) system. We perform a theoretical examination of the resolution capabilities of the applied system. Quantitative model parameter analyses show that the system only weakly resolves conductive, near-surface layers but Call resolve layer boundary to a depth of more than 100 m. Modeling experiments also show that the effect of altimeter errors on the inversion results is serious. We suggest a new interpretation scheme for HEM data founded solely on full nonlinear ID inversion and providing layered-earth models supported by data misfit parameters and a quantitative model-parameter analysis. The backbone of the scheme is the removal of cultural coupling effects followed by a multilayer inversion that in turn provides reliable starting models for a subsequent few-layer inversion. A new procedure for correlation ill the model space ensures model sections with slow lateral variations in resistivity, normally assumed in sedimentary environments. A field example from a Danish survey demonstrates that the interpretation scheme call produce satisfactory results within the limitations of the system.
引用
收藏
页码:G53 / G62
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Appraisal of a new 1D weighted joint inversion of ground based and helicopter-borne electromagnetic data
    Sudha
    Tezkan, Buelent
    Siemon, Bernhard
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2014, 62 (03) : 597 - 614
  • [2] A comparison of 2D inversion of RMT and 1D weighted joint inversion of ground-based and helicopter-borne electromagnetic data
    Agrahari, Sudha
    Tezkan, Bülent
    Siemon, Bernhard
    Agrahari, Sudha (sudha@gg.iitkgp.ac.in), 1600, Elsevier B.V. (194):
  • [3] A comparison of 2D inversion of RMT and 1D weighted joint inversion of ground-based and helicopter-borne electromagnetic data
    Agrahari, Sudha
    Tezkan, Buelent
    Siemon, Bernhard
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2021, 194
  • [4] Fast approximate 1D modelling and inversion of transient electromagnetic data
    Christensen, Niels B.
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2016, 64 (06) : 1620 - 1631
  • [5] Fast approximate 1D inversion of frequency domain electromagnetic data
    Christensen, Niels B.
    Fitzpatrick, Andrew
    Munday, Tim
    NEAR SURFACE GEOPHYSICS, 2010, 8 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [6] Robust inversion of 1D magnetotelluric data using the Huber loss function
    Desifatma, Elfitra
    Djaja, I. Gede Putu Fadjar Soerya
    Pratomo, Prihandhanu Mukti
    Supriyadi
    Mustopa, Enjang Jaenal
    Evita, Maria
    Djamal, Mitra
    Srigutomo, Wahyu
    COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2024, 28 (04) : 629 - 643
  • [7] 1D inversion and resolution analysis of marine CSEM data
    Christensen, Niels B.
    Dodds, Kevin
    GEOPHYSICS, 2007, 72 (02) : WA27 - WA38
  • [8] 1D sequential inversion of portable multi-configuration electromagnetic induction data
    Guillemoteau, Julien
    Simon, Francois-Xavier
    Luck, Erika
    Tronicke, Jens
    NEAR SURFACE GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 14 (05) : 423 - 432
  • [9] A discussion of 2D induced polarization effects in airborne electromagnetic and inversion with a robust 1D laterally constrained inversion scheme
    Lin, Changhong
    Fiandaca, Gianluca
    Auken, Esben
    Couto, Marco Antonio
    Christiansen, Anders Vest
    GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 84 (02) : E75 - E88
  • [10] The application of 1D Occam inversion of CSAMT data
    He, Meixing
    Hu, Xiangyun
    Cheng, Yuping
    Ye, Yixin
    Zhou, Xiaocheng
    NEAR-SURFACE GEOPHYSICS AND HUMAN ACTIVITY, 2008, : 381 - 384