Decoy effect in food appearance, traceability, and price: Case of consumer preference for pork hindquarters

被引:21
|
作者
Wu, Linhai [1 ]
Liu, Pingping [2 ]
Chen, Xiujuan [1 ]
Hu, Wuyang [3 ]
Fan, Xuesen [3 ]
Chen, Yuhuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ, Sch Business, Inst Food Safety Risk Management, Wuxi 214122, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangnan Univ, Sch Business, Wuxi 214122, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Agr Environm & Dev Econ, 2120 Fyffe Rd, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Pork hindquarter; Traceability information; Consumer behavior; Bounded rationality; Decoy effect; Food safety; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; HYPOTHETICAL BIAS; ATTRACTION; DECISION; INFORMATION; COMPROMISE; CHOICE; SIMILARITY; QUALITY; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.socec.2020.101553
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As a manifestation of bounded rationality, decoy effect occurs when adding a new choice option into an existing choice set increases the probability of some options in the original set being chosen. Decoy effect has been shown to exist widely in consumer purchasing decision-making regarding common consumer goods. However, few studies have explored decoy effect in consumer food choices. In a survey using pork hindquarter products, we identified decoy effect in food purchase behavior and the effect varied for different pork hindquarter attributes. Specifically, we showed that given the price, both pork appearance and traceability produced stronger decoy effect than price and traceability generated stronger decoy effect than appearance. This suggests that while consumers look for food quality and safety attributes in addition to price, these attributes may also lead to decoy effects. Our study provides implications for food marketing and better understanding of consumer food choices.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Consumers' decoy effect when purchasing pork with traceability technologies
    Chen, Mo
    Liu, Pingping
    Wu, Linhai
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [2] Effect of meat appearance on consumer preferences for pork chops in Greece and Cyprus
    Fortomaris, P
    Arsenos, G
    Georgiadis, M
    Banos, G
    Stamataris, C
    Zygoyiannis, D
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2006, 72 (04) : 688 - 696
  • [3] Contents of product attributes and the decoy effect: A study on traceable pork from the perspective of consumer utility
    Wu, Linhai
    Liu, Pingping
    Chen, Xiujuan
    Hu, Wuyang
    Fan, Xuesen
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2021, 42 (04) : 974 - 984
  • [4] Consumer Preference for Grass-Fed Beef: A Case of Food Safety Halo Effect
    Lim, Kar H.
    Hu, Wuyang
    Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2021, 46 (03) : 447 - +
  • [5] Do Consumer's Green Preference and the Reference Price Effect Improve Green Innovation? A Theoretical Model Using the Food Supply Chain as a Case
    He, Jianhong
    Lei, Yaling
    Fu, Xiao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (24)
  • [6] Food scares and asymmetric price transmission: the case of the pork market in China
    Dai, Jiawu
    Li, Xun
    Wang, Xiuqing
    [J]. STUDIES IN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 119 (02): : 98 - 106
  • [7] Econometric Analysis of the Relationship between Wholesale Price and Consumer Price in the Pork Agri-food Chain in the Czech Republic
    Sobrova, Lenka
    [J]. AGRARIAN PERSPECTIVES, 2010, : 163 - 171
  • [8] The influence of traceability label trust on consumers' traceability pork purchasing behavior: Based on the moderating effect of food safety identification
    Liu, Zengjin
    Yu, Zhuo
    Zhao, Jing
    Han, Xibing
    Li, Caixia
    Geng, Ning
    Yu, Meilian
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (06):
  • [9] Compromise Effect in Food Consumer Choices in China: An Analysis on Pork Products
    Wu, Linhai
    Gong, Xiaoru
    Chen, Xiujuan
    Hu, Wuyang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [10] Consumer price awareness in food shopping: the case of quantity surcharges
    Binkley, JK
    Bejnarowicz, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2003, 79 (01) : 27 - 35