The Effect of Auditing Standard No. 5 on Audit Report Lags

被引:28
|
作者
Mitra, Santanu [1 ]
Song, Hakjoon [2 ]
Yang, Joon Sun [3 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Univ Akron, Akron, OH 44325 USA
[3] Sogang Univ, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
audit report lags; AS5; PCAOB; SOX; 404; INTERNAL CONTROL; IMPACT; FEES; DETERMINANTS; TIMELINESS; WEAKNESSES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.2308/acch-51052
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Auditing Standard No. 5 (AS5) introduced by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) in June 2007 requires a top-down risk-based approach in auditing and is expected to improve audit efficiency and make the overall auditing process timelier by reducing audit report lags. We investigate the impact of AS5 on audit report lags over an extended period from 2006 to 2011 and find that audit report lags are lower in the AS5 years (2007-2011) relative to the AS2 years (2006-2007). But this reduction is evident mostly for the firms with clean SOX 404 opinions. The presence of material internal control weaknesses (ICW) significantly increases audit report lags, but AS5 does not have any incremental moderating effect on report lags and the ICW relationship. Tests for the firms with company-level and account-specific ICWs demonstrate identical results. Additional analyses show that the learning curve effect takes place rapidly in the early part of the AS5 period and audits continue to remain efficient in terms of reduced report lags in the latter part of the AS5 period relative to the AS2 period. The year-to-year change analyses for the AS5 period further corroborate this result. Overall, our study demonstrates that the top-down, risk-based approach under AS5 makes the audit process more efficient and timelier by decreasing audit report lags.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 527
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Effect of Auditing Standard No. 5 on Audit Fees
    Krishnan, Jagan
    Krishnan, Jayanthi
    Song, Hakjoon
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2011, 30 (04): : 1 - 27
  • [2] The Impact of PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 5 on Audit Fees and Audit Quality
    Wang, Dechun
    Zhou, Jian
    [J]. ACCOUNTING HORIZONS, 2012, 26 (03) : 493 - 511
  • [3] The Impact of PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 5, the PCAOB Inspection Regime, and the Great Recession on Audit Fees and Audit Quality
    Johnson, Elizabeth S.
    Reichelt, Kenneth J.
    Soileau, Jared S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND FINANCE, 2023, 38 (02): : 413 - 436
  • [4] Related Party Transactions and Audit Quality: Evidence on the Efficacy of Auditing Standard No. 18
    Ahmed, Anwer S.
    Al-Dah, Bilal
    El-Helaly, Moataz
    Fleszar, Krzysztof
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2024, 43 (01): : 1 - 25
  • [5] The Effect of the SEC's XBRL Mandate on Audit Report Lags
    Amin, Keval
    Eshleman, John Daniel
    Feng, Cecilia Qian
    [J]. ACCOUNTING HORIZONS, 2018, 32 (01) : 1 - 27
  • [6] The Strategic Effects of Auditing Standard No. 5 in a Multi-Location Setting
    Patterson, Evelyn R.
    Smith, J. Reed
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2016, 35 (01): : 119 - 138
  • [7] Are Lengthy Audit Report Lags a Warning Signal?
    Blankley, Alan I.
    Hurtt, David N.
    MacGregor, Jason E.
    [J]. CURRENT ISSUES IN AUDITING, 2015, 9 (02): : P19 - P28
  • [8] The Relationship between Audit Report Lags and Future Restatements
    Blankley, Alan I.
    Hurtt, David N.
    MacGregor, Jason E.
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2014, 33 (02): : 27 - 57
  • [9] Recent Trends in Audit Report and Earnings Announcement Lags
    Krishnan, Jayanthi
    Yang, Joon S.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING HORIZONS, 2009, 23 (03) : 265 - 288