TAKING THE CONFUSION OUT OF "LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION": TOWARD A MORE SENSIBLE APPROACH TO TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

被引:0
|
作者
Bone, Robert G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Sch Law, Austin, TX 78705 USA
关键词
UNFAIR-COMPETITION; LEGAL; INFORMATION; PUBLICITY; PROPERTY; LAW;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This Article critically examines the core infringement standard for trademark law-the "likelihood of confusion" test-which imposes liability if an appreciable number of consumers are likely to be confused by the defendant's use of its mark. The test is a mess. It produces bad results, is doctrinally incoherent, and lacks a sensible normative foundation. It chills socially valuable uses and facilitates excessively broad expansions of trademark law, and it includes factors that make no sense as predictors of likely confusion. Most importantly, the test erroneously assumes that consumer confusion is enough to warrant liability without regard to the harmful consequences or the moral wrongfulness of the defendant's conduct. This Article diagnoses these problems and proposes a set of promising reforms. It begins by presenting a systematic history of the test's origins. The likelihood of confusion test emerged in the early 1960s as a compromise between conflicting views about the proper scope of protection against noncompeting uses, a compromise that papered over the conflict without resolving the underlying normative disagreement. The result is a test without a secure normative foundation and one that remains plagued by the conflicts and disagreements that gave it birth. The test's history also suggests a promising avenue for reform. To improve the infringement standard, one must start at the normative level and work from a coherent theory of trademark law's goals. This Article distinguishes between moral and economic goals and fits infringement standards to the most plausible justifications for protecting marks. In those cases involving a moral wrong, such as intentional deception, moral principles should shape the test. In those cases where the economic goals of trademark law are paramount, the test should focus not only on the probability of confusion but also on the trademark-related harm that confusion generates.
引用
收藏
页码:1307 / 1378
页数:72
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Likelihood of confusion - The basis for trademark infringement
    Radack, DV
    [J]. JOM-JOURNAL OF THE MINERALS METALS & MATERIALS SOCIETY, 2002, 54 (12): : 80 - 80
  • [2] Likelihood of confusion — The basis for trademark infringement
    David V. Radack
    [J]. JOM, 2002, 54 : 80 - 80
  • [3] CONSUMER CONFUSION AND TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
    MIAOULIS, G
    DAMATO, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1978, 42 (02): : 48 - 55
  • [4] Measuring source, affiliation, and permission likelihood of consumer confusion in trademark infringement litigation
    Peterson, Robert A.
    Cunningham, Isabella M.
    Peterson, Jeffrey A.
    [J]. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 2024, 17 (02) : 182 - 205
  • [5] Sorting out "fair use" and "likelihood of confusion" in trademark law
    Greene, SM
    [J]. AMERICAN BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL, 2006, 43 (01) : 43 - 77
  • [6] TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT AND CONFUSION OF SOURCE: NEED FOR SUPREME COURT ACTION
    Lunsford, Julius R., Jr.
    [J]. VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1949, 35 (02) : 214 - 234
  • [7] Possibility of confusion in Third Circuit trademark infringement: A standard without a test
    Perry, DM
    [J]. TEMPLE LAW REVIEW, 1998, 71 (02): : 325 - 346
  • [8] Taking the Confusion Out of Multinomial Confusion Matrices and Imbalanced Classes
    Lovell, David
    McCarron, Bridget
    Langfield, Brendan
    Khoa Tran
    Bradley, Andrew P.
    [J]. DATA MINING, AUSDM 2021, 2021, 1504 : 16 - 30
  • [9] The effects of brand name similarity on brand source confusion: Implications for trademark infringement
    Howard, DJ
    Kerin, RA
    Gengler, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY & MARKETING, 2000, 19 (02) : 250 - 264
  • [10] Creative Solutions for Taking the Confusion Out of Transfusion
    Gorey, T. M.
    Bowen-Brady, H.
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2015, 55 : 222A - 222A