A review of cyclic testing protocols for flexor tendon repairs

被引:9
|
作者
Chang, Min Kai [1 ]
Lim, Zeus Yiwei [2 ]
Wong, Yoke Rung [2 ]
Tay, Shian Chao [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Duke NUS Med Sch, 8 Coll Rd, Singapore 169867, Singapore
[2] Singapore Gen Hosp, Biomech Lab, Level 1 Acad,20 Coll Rd, Singapore 169856, Singapore
[3] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Hand Surg, Level 4 Acad,20 Coll Rd, Singapore 169856, Singapore
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Cyclic Testing Protocol; Flexor Tendon Repairs; Uneven Repair Gap; Rehabilitation; Mobilization; Dynamic; ZONE-II; MODIFIED KESSLER; GAP FORMATION; CORE SUTURE; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; GLIDING RESISTANCE; STRENGTH; MOTION; MOBILIZATION; EXCURSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.12.007
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background Cyclic testing of flexor tendons aims to simulate post-operative rehabilitation and is more rigorous than static testing. However, there are many different protocols, making comparisons difficult. We reviewed these protocols and suggested two protocols that simulate passive and active mobilization. Methods: Literature search was performed to look for cyclic testing protocols used to evaluate flexor tendon repairs. Preload, cyclic load, number of cycles, frequency and displacement rate were categorised. Findings: Thirty-five studies with 42 different protocols were included. Thirty-one protocols were single-staged, while 11 protocols were multiple-staged. Twenty-nine out of 42 protocols used preload, ranging from 0.2 to 5 N. Preload of 2 N was used in most protocols. The cyclic load that was most commonly used was between 11 and 20 N. Cyclic load with increment of 10 N after each stage was used in multiple-staged protocols. The most commonly used number of cycles was between 100 and 1000. Most protocols used a frequency of < 1 Hz and displacement rate between 0 and 20 mm/min. Interpretation: We propose two single-staged protocols as examples. Protocol 1: cyclic load of 15 N to simulate passive mobilization with preload of 2 N and 2000 cycles at frequency of 0.2 Hz.; Protocol 2: cyclic load of 38 N to simulate active mobilization, with the same preload, number of cycles, and frequency as above. This review consolidates the current understanding of cyclic testing and may help clinicians and investigators improve the design of flexor tendon repairs, allow for comparisons of different repairs using the same protocol, and evaluate flexor tendon repairs more rigorously before clinical applications.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 49
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cyclic testing of flexor tendon repairs:: An in vitro biomechanical study
    Sanders, DW
    Milne, AD
    Dobravec, A
    MacDermid, J
    Johnson, JA
    King, GJW
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1997, 22A (06): : 1004 - 1010
  • [2] Cyclical testing of zone II flexor tendon repairs
    Choueka, J
    Heminger, H
    Mass, DP
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 25A (06): : 1127 - 1134
  • [3] Comparison of zone II flexor tendon repairs using an in vitro linear cyclic testing protocol
    Matheson, G
    Nicklin, S
    Gianoutsous, MP
    Walsh, WR
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2005, 20 (07) : 718 - 722
  • [4] A cyclic testing comparison of two flexor tendon repairs: asymmetric and modified Lim-Tsai techniques
    Lim, Rebecca Q. R.
    Wong, Yoke-Rung
    Loke, Austin M. K.
    Tay, Shian-Chao
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2018, 43 (05) : 494 - 498
  • [5] Flexor Tendon Repair Rehabilitation Protocols: A Systematic Review
    Starr, Harlan M.
    Snoddy, Mark
    Hammond, Kyle E.
    Seiler, John G., III
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 38A (09): : 1712 - 1717
  • [6] SPLINT MODIFICATION FOR FLEXOR TENDON REPAIRS
    LOPEZ, MS
    HANLEY, KF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1984, 38 (06): : 398 - 403
  • [7] A systematic review of patient outcomes for primary pediatric flexor tendon repairs
    Huynh, Minh N. Q.
    Karir, Aneesh
    Kim, Patrick J.
    JOURNAL OF HAND AND MICROSURGERY, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [8] A biomechanical comparison of multistrand flexor tendon repairs using an in situ testing model
    Barrie, KA
    Wolfe, SW
    Shean, C
    Shenbagamurthi, D
    Slade, FF
    Panjabi, MM
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 25A (03): : 499 - 506
  • [9] Gap Formation During Cyclic Testing of Flexor Tendon Repair
    Linnanmaki, Lasse
    Goransson, Harry
    Havulinna, Jouni
    Sippola, Petteri
    Karjalainen, Teemu
    Leppanen, Olli V.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2018, 43 (06): : 570.e1 - 570.e8
  • [10] Negative Predictors of Outcomes of Flexor Tendon Repairs
    Hurley, C. M.
    Reilly, Frank
    Callaghan, Simon
    Baig, M. N.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (03)