Disturbance type and intensity combine to affect resilience of an intertidal community

被引:5
|
作者
Wootton, Henry F. [1 ]
Keough, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch BioSci, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Recovery; Rocky reefs; Canopy; Intertidal; Ecosystem engineer; Hormosira banksii; NEW-SOUTH-WALES; SEDIMENT DISTURBANCE; LIFE-HISTORY; ROCKY SHORES; SEVERE STORM; KELP FOREST; CORAL-REEFS; NEW-ZEALAND; RECRUITMENT; HABITAT;
D O I
10.3354/meps11861
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Differing disturbance agents may vary in the local spatial pattern of their effects, which may in turn influence the resilience of communities, particularly if ecologically important species are affected variably. Here, we investigated the effects of disturbance type on the ecologically important intertidal alga Hormosira banksii and its understory community at 2 sites in southeastern Australia. Replicate 60 x 40 cm plots containing dense H. banksii canopies were disturbed with 11 treatments that varied the severity and type of the disturbance, and included 0 and 100% removal controls, plus a factorial array of 3 disturbance types (cropped, clumped and haphazard removals) crossed with 3 severities of removal (25, 50, and 75% of biomass removed). H. banksii cover, sediment loads and understory community were monitored 7 times over 25 mo. H. banksii recovery (and thus, resilience) was relatively high and was consistent across sites, but both the type and severity of disturbance had effects. Cropped treatments recovered quickly compared to clumped and haphazard treatments, which took up to 6 mo longer to recover as the severity of disturbance increased. Clumped and haphazard removals also produced varied responses in some understory species. This experiment demonstrates that disturbance type, as well as the more commonly explored disturbance severity, may be an important component of the disturbance-resilience relationship.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 133
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Required sampling intensity for community analyses of intertidal infauna to detect a mechanical disturbance
    Travis G. Gerwing
    Alyssa M. Allen Gerwing
    Morgan M. Davies
    Francis Juanes
    Sarah E. Dudas
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2022, 194
  • [2] Required sampling intensity for community analyses of intertidal infauna to detect a mechanical disturbance
    Gerwing, Travis G.
    Gerwing, Alyssa M. Allen
    Davies, Morgan M.
    Juanes, Francis
    Dudas, Sarah E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2022, 194 (12)
  • [3] Disturbance Type and Sagebrush Community Type Affect Plant Community Structure After Shrub Reduction
    Riginos, Corinna
    Veblen, Kari E.
    Thacker, Eric T.
    Gunnell, Kevin L.
    Monaco, Thomas A.
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 72 (04) : 619 - 631
  • [4] Resilience of an intertidal infaunal community to winter stressors
    Gerwing, Travis G.
    Drolet, David
    Barbeau, Myriam A.
    Hamilton, Diana J.
    Gerwing, Alyssa M. Allen
    JOURNAL OF SEA RESEARCH, 2015, 97 : 40 - 49
  • [5] Gradients of disturbance to an algal canopy and the modification of an intertidal community
    Schiel, David R.
    Lilley, Stacie A.
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2007, 339 : 1 - 11
  • [6] Effects of trampling on intertidal mussel beds: importance of disturbance intensity
    Mendez, Maria M.
    Livore, Juan P.
    Bigatti, Gregorio
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2018, 606 : 231 - 235
  • [7] Disturbance severity and community resilience in a boreal forest
    Rydgren, K
    Okland, RH
    Hestmark, G
    ECOLOGY, 2004, 85 (07) : 1906 - 1915
  • [8] RESILIENCE OF A ROCKY INTERTIDAL FISH COMMUNITY IN A PHYSICALLY UNSTABLE ENVIRONMENT
    THOMSON, DA
    LEHNER, CE
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 1976, 22 (01) : 1 - 29
  • [9] Disturbance type influences plant community resilience and resistance to Bromus tectorum invasion in the sagebrush steppe
    Seipel, Tim
    Rew, Lisa J.
    Taylor, Kimberley T.
    Maxwell, Bruce D.
    Lehnhoff, Erik A.
    APPLIED VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2018, 21 (03) : 385 - 394