D-amino Acid Inhibits Biofilm but not New Bone Formation in an Ovine Model

被引:22
|
作者
Harmata, Andrew J. [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Yun [2 ,5 ]
Sanchez, Carlos J. [4 ]
Zienkiewicz, Katarzyna J. [1 ]
Elefteriou, Florent [2 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Wenke, Joseph C. [4 ]
Guelcher, Scott A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ Sch Med, Ctr Bone Biol, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[4] US Army, Inst Surg Res, Extrem Trauma & Regenerat Med Task Area, San Antonio, TX USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Clin Pharmacol, Nashville, TN USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ Sch Med, Dept Pharmacol, Nashville, TN USA
[7] Vanderbilt Univ Sch Med, Dept Canc Biol, Nashville, TN USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURES; IN-VITRO; POLYURETHANE SCAFFOLDS; GROWTH-FACTOR; INFECTION; COMPLICATIONS; SUSCEPTIBILITY; ANTIBIOTICS; PREVENTION; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-015-4465-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Infectious complications of musculoskeletal trauma are an important factor contributing to patient morbidity. Biofilm-dispersive bone grafts augmented with d-amino acids (d-AAs) prevent biofilm formation in vitro and in vivo, but the effects of d-AAs on osteocompatibility and new bone formation have not been investigated. Questions/purposes We asked: (1) Do d-AAs hinder osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation in vitro? (2) Does local delivery of d-AAs from low-viscosity bone grafts inhibit new bone formation in a large-animal model? Methods Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S aureus clinical isolates, mouse bone marrow stromal cells, and osteoclast precursor cells were treated with an equal mass (1:1:1) mixture of d-Pro:d-Met:d-Phe. The effects of the d-AA dose on biofilm inhibition (n = 4), biofilm dispersion (n = 4), and bone marrow stromal cell proliferation (n = 3) were quantitatively measured by crystal violet staining. Osteoblast differentiation was quantitatively assessed by alkaline phosphatase staining, von Kossa staining, and quantitative reverse transcription for the osteogenic factors a1Col1 and Ocn (n = 3). Osteoclast differentiation was quantitatively measured by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining (n = 3). Bone grafts augmented with 0 or 200 mmol/L d-AAs were injected in ovine femoral condyle defects in four sheep. New bone formation was evaluated by mu CT and histology 4 months later. An a priori power analysis indicated that a sample size of four would detect a 7.5% difference of bone volume/total volume between groups assuming a mean and SD of 30% and 5%, respectively, with a power of 80% and an alpha level of 0.05 using a two-tailed t-test between the means of two independent samples. Results Bone marrow stromal cell proliferation, osteoblast differentiation, and osteoclast differentiation were inhibited at d-AAs concentrations of 27 mmol/L or greater in a dose-responsive manner in vitro (p < 0.05). In methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant S aureus clinical isolates, d-AAs inhibited biofilm formation at concentrations of 13.5 mmol/L or greater in vitro (p < 0.05). Local delivery of d-AAs from low-viscosity grafts did not inhibit new bone formation in a large-animal model pilot study (0 mmol/L d-AAs: bone volume/total volume = 26.9% +/- 4.1%; 200 mmol/L d-AAs: bone volume/total volume = 28.3% +/- 15.4%; mean difference with 95% CI = -1.4; p = 0.13). Conclusions D-AAs inhibit biofilm formation, bone marrow stromal cell proliferation, osteoblast differentiation, and osteoclast differentiation in vitro in a dose-responsive manner. Local delivery of d-AAs from bone grafts did not inhibit new bone formation in vivo at clinically relevant doses.
引用
收藏
页码:3951 / 3961
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CORR Insights®: D-amino Acid Inhibits Biofilm but not New Bone Formation in an Ovine Model
    Jennings, Jessica Amber
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 473 (12) : 3962 - 3964
  • [2] Creatinine inhibits D-amino acid oxidase
    Nohara, Y
    Suzuki, J
    Kinoshita, T
    Watanabe, M
    NEPHRON, 2002, 91 (02): : 281 - 285
  • [3] Inhibition of Campylobacter jejuni Biofilm Formation by D-Amino Acids
    Elgamoudi, Bassam A.
    Taha, Taha
    Korolik, Victoria
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2020, 9 (11): : 1 - 13
  • [4] Study on the Behavior and Mechanism of D-amino Acid Dispersing Biofilm
    Xu C.
    Gao H.
    Zhu W.
    Yang X.
    Chen Y.
    Wang W.
    Cailiao Daobao/Materials Reports, 2023, 37 (01):
  • [5] Effect of different D-amino acids on biofilm formation of mixed microorganisms
    Su, Xinying
    Cheng, Xin
    Wang, Yu
    Luo, Jintao
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 85 (01) : 116 - 124
  • [6] d-Amino Acids Do Not Inhibit Biofilm Formation in Staphylococcus aureus
    Sarkar, Sourav
    Pires, Marcos M.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (02):
  • [7] D-Amino acid oxidase: new findings
    Pilone, MS
    CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES, 2000, 57 (12) : 1732 - 1747
  • [8] IMINO ACID FORMATION BY D-AMINO AND L-AMINO ACID OXIDASES
    HAFNER, EW
    WELLNER, D
    FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1971, 30 (03) : 1211 - &
  • [9] D-Amino acid oxidase: new findings
    M. S. Pilone
    Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS, 2000, 57 : 1732 - 1747
  • [10] D-Amino acid mitigated membrane biofouling and promoted biofilm detachment
    Xu, Huijuan
    Liu, Yu
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2011, 376 (1-2) : 266 - 274