Flood risk management and shared responsibility: Exploring Canadian public attitudes and expectations

被引:41
|
作者
Henstra, Daniel [1 ]
Thistlethwaite, Jason [2 ]
Brown, Craig [2 ]
Scott, Daniel [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Polit Sci, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Sch Environm Enterprise & Dev, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Waterloo, Geog & Environm Management, Waterloo, ON, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT | 2019年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
Canada; flood risk management; public attitudes; shared responsibility; survey; PROTECTION; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1111/jfr3.12346
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
One of the central tenets of the flood risk management (FRM) paradigm is that responsibility for flood mitigation and recovery must be shared with stakeholders other than governments, including property-owners themselves. However, existing research suggests that this imperative is unlikely to be effective unless property-owners demonstrate a sense of personal responsibility and are willing to undertake protective behaviours. In Canada, several recent policy changes have effectively transferred more responsibility to homeowners, but it is unclear whether Canadians are ready to accept this obligation. This article presents results from a national survey of Canadians living in high-risk flood areas, which probed their attitudes concerning the division of responsibility for flood mitigation and recovery among governments, insurers and homeowners, as well as their willingness to adopt protective behaviours. The survey, which received 2,300 responses from all 10 provinces, indicates that Canadians are willing to accept some responsibility, but for most this perceived responsibility is insufficient to influence their decisions on mitigation and recovery. Governments in Canada could learn from jurisdictions that have addressed this disconnect through policies designed to improve awareness of FRM among property-owners.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] From 'flood defence' to 'flood risk management': exploring governance, responsibility, and blame
    Butler, Catherine
    Pidgeon, Nick
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2011, 29 (03): : 533 - 547
  • [2] Eu action programme on flood risk management; towards a shared responsibility
    Dierikx, M
    [J]. Floods, from Defence to Management, Symposium Proceedings, 2006, : 89 - 91
  • [3] Managed retreat from high-risk flood areas: exploring public attitudes and expectations about property buyouts
    Raikes, Jonathan
    Henstra, Daniel
    Thistlethwaite, Jason
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2023, 22 (02): : 136 - 151
  • [4] Public Attitudes Toward Policy Instruments for Flood Risk Management
    Jonathan Raikes
    Daniel Henstra
    Jason Thistlethwaite
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2023, 72 : 1050 - 1060
  • [5] Public Attitudes Toward Policy Instruments for Flood Risk Management
    Raikes, Jonathan
    Henstra, Daniel
    Thistlethwaite, Jason
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 72 (05) : 1050 - 1060
  • [6] Shared roles and responsibilities in flood risk management
    Priest, Sally
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2019, 12 (01):
  • [7] Public Private Partnerships: a manifestation of innovation and shared responsibility in public management
    Alvarez Patino, Luz Astrid
    [J]. ESTUDIOS DE DERECHO, 2016, 73 (162): : 141 - 172
  • [8] Flood risk management in England: A changing landscape of risk responsibility?
    Johnson, Clare L.
    Priest, Sally J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 24 (04) : 513 - 525
  • [9] Apathy to action: engaging the public in flood risk management
    Borrows, Peter
    [J]. HOUILLE BLANCHE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE L EAU, 2007, (01): : 62 - +
  • [10] Responsibility of territorial authorities in risk management as public policy
    Safar Diaz, Monica Sofia
    [J]. REVISTA DIGITAL DE DERECHO ADMINISTRATIVO, 2012, (07): : 45 - 62