A field-validated species distribution model to support management of the critically endangered Poweshiek skipperling (Oarisma poweshiek) butterfly in Canada

被引:20
|
作者
Westwood, Richard [1 ]
Westwood, Alana R. [1 ]
Hooshmandi, Mahsa [1 ]
Pearson, Kara [1 ]
LaFrance, Kerienne [1 ]
Murray, Colin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Winnipeg, Dept Environm Studies & Sci, 515 Portage Ave, Winnipeg, MB R3B 2E9, Canada
[2] Manitoba Conservat Data Ctr, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
关键词
field-validation; Maxent; species at risk; VULNERABLE MARINE ECOSYSTEMS; FRAGMENTED LANDSCAPES; HABITAT; CONSERVATION; SCALE; DIVERSITY; CLIMATE; NICHE; BIAS; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1111/csp2.163
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The Poweshiek skipperling (Oarisma poweshiek) is a critically endangered grassland butterfly with six populations remaining in the United States and Canada. The single Canadian population, with the largest remaining contiguous habitat, includes less than similar to 50 observed individuals and extirpation is potentially imminent. Captive breeding is underway and there is a need to locate suitable sites for reintroduction and habitat management. Species distribution models (SDMs) predict habitat quality and guide management decisions. Most SDMs rely on statistical validation as a surrogate metric for accuracy, with presence-only SDMs usually reporting area under the curve (AUC). Although experts have long cautioned against relying on statistical validation alone, accuracy is rarely field-validated. We developed a presence-only SDM using the maximum entropy (Maxent) method to predict probability of occurrence for the Poweshiek skipperling and determine environmental covariates associated with high probability of occurrence. We collected two independent datasets to (a) calibrate our model to predict categories of habitat quality (using factor analysis) and (b) compare expected and observed habitat quality to calculate model accuracy. Statistical validation showed that we predicted presence-absence of training data with high accuracy (AUC = 0.98). Covariates responsible for most of the variation in probability of occurrence included soil drainage, habitat patch size, and land use type. Only 0.4% of the study area was expected to represent good-excellent habitat with the remaining 99.6% medium-poor. Our model predicted novel habitat quality with 81% accuracy (better than chance). Poor-medium habitat was predicted more accurately (92%) than good-excellent habitat (54%). Our model showed better accuracy than most other field-validated SDMs reviewed. We reiterate calls for greater field-validation of SDMs: if we had relied on statistical validation alone, perceived accuracy of our model would be inflated. Finally, managers can use our results to reliably exclude predicted poor-medium habitats as candidates for Poweshiek skipperling habitat management or reintroduction.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Management practices benefit endangered Poweshiek skipperling (Oarisma poweshiek) in Manitoba tall grass prairie
    Knight, Samantha M.
    Bleho, Barbara I.
    Grantham, Melissa A.
    Westwood, Richard
    Koper, Nicola
    Hamel, Cary D.
    [J]. FACETS, 2024, 9 : 1 - 12
  • [2] An Assessment of Prairie Management Practices for Maintaining Habitat Quality for the Endangered Poweshiek Skipperling Butterfly in Canada
    Dupont-Morozoff, Jaimee
    Westwood, Richard
    Henault, Justis
    [J]. AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST, 2022, 188 (01): : 74 - 101
  • [3] A field-validated ensemble species distribution model of Eriogonum pelinophilum, an endangered subshrub in Colorado, USA
    Zimmer, Scott N.
    Holsinger, Kenneth W.
    Dawson, Carol A.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 13 (12):