Design review boards - current state of practice

被引：0
|
作者：
Elioff, A [1 ]
Edgerton, WW [1 ]
机构：
[1] Parsons Brinckerhoff, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源：
NORTH AMERICAN TUNNELING 2004 | 2004年
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号：
0813 ;
摘要：
This paper summarizes the current state of practice on the use of design review boards, or consulting boards, as used primarily used during design of underground construction projects. It discusses the various types of boards in use and reviews the history, and then, using the results of an industry survey of both owners and consultants, it discusses the purpose and typical uses, provides examples of specific outcomes, and reviews the methods of selection and modes of operation. It summarizes the advantages and disadvantages, evaluates the use of the construction manager to provide design review, and provides recommendations for future users based upon the lessons learned to date.
引用
收藏
页码：5 / 13
页数：9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Liquidated damages: Review of current state of the practice
    Crowley, L. G.
    Zech, W. C.
    Bailey, C.
    Gujar, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL ISSUES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2008, 134 (04) : 383 - 390
  • [2] TEACHING ETHICS IN DESIGN: A REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE
    Lofthouse, V. A.
    Lilley, D.
    [J]. ICED 09 - THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN, VOL 10: DESIGN EDUCATION AND LIFELONG LEARNING, 2009, : 137 - 148
  • [3] THE DESIGN OF CATI SYSTEMS - A REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE
    BAKER, RP
    LEFES, WL
    [J]. TELEPHONE SURVEY METHODOLOGY, 1988, : 387 - 402
  • [4] Critical review: a summary of the current state-of-practice
    Curran, Mary Ann
    Young, Steven B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (10): : 1667 - 1673
  • [5] Critical review: a summary of the current state-of-practice
    Mary Ann Curran
    Steven B. Young
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2014, 19 : 1667 - 1673
  • [6] Current State of Minitablet Product Design: A Review
    Meruva, Saikishore
    Singaraju, Aditya B.
    Vinjamuri, Bhavani Prasad
    Ternik, Robert
    Stagner, William C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 113 (05) : 1123 - 1154
  • [7] DISPUTE REVIEW BOARDS IN WASHINGTON STATE
    COFFEE, JD
    [J]. ARBITRATION JOURNAL, 1988, 43 (04): : 58 - 61
  • [8] Molecular Tumor Boards: current practice and future needs
    van der Velden, D. L.
    van Herpen, C. M. L.
    van Laarhoven, H. W. M.
    Smit, E. F.
    Groen, H. J. M.
    Willems, S. M.
    Nederlof, P. M.
    Langenberg, M. H. G.
    Cuppen, E.
    Sleijfer, S.
    Steeghs, N.
    Voest, E. E.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28 (12) : 3070 - 3075
  • [9] MAKING DESIGN REVIEW BOARDS WORK
    BEAUMONT, CE
    [J]. ARCHITECTURAL RECORD, 1992, 180 (01) : 34 - &
  • [10] Urban tunnels in soft ground: Review of current design practice
    Wedekin, Vinicius da Mota
    Kastner, Richard
    Guilloux, Alain
    Bezuijen, Adam
    Standing, Jamie
    Negro, Arsenio, Jr.
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION IN SOFT GROUND, 7TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM, 2012, : 1047 - 1064
12345