An integrated model for assessment of sustainable agricultural residue removal limits for bioenergy systems

被引:48
|
作者
Muth, D. J., Jr. [1 ]
Bryden, K. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Idaho Natl Lab, Biofuels & Renewable Energy Technol Div, Idaho Falls, ID 83415 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
Bioenergy; Agricultural residues; Soil erosion; Soil organic carbon; Model integration; GREENHOUSE-GAS FLUX; SOIL-EROSION; CORN STOVER; QUALITY; FRAMEWORK; METHODOLOGY; SUBMODEL; DAYCENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.04.006
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Agricultural residues have been identified as a significant potential resource for bioenergy production, but serious questions remain about the sustainability of harvesting residues. Agricultural residues play an important role in limiting soil erosion from wind and water and in maintaining soil organic carbon. Because of this, multiple factors must be considered when assessing sustainable residue harvest limits. Validated and accepted modeling tools for assessing these impacts include the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation Version 2 (RUSLE2), the Wind Erosion Prediction System (WEPS), and the Soil Conditioning Index. Currently, these models do not work together as a single integrated model. Rather, use of these models requires manual interaction and data transfer. As a result, it is currently not feasible to use these computational tools to perform detailed sustainable agricultural residue availability assessments across large spatial domains or to consider a broad range of land management practices. This paper presents an integrated modeling strategy that couples existing datasets with the RUSLE2 water erosion, WEPS wind erosion, and Soil Conditioning Index soil carbon modeling tools to create a single integrated residue removal modeling system. This enables the exploration of the detailed sustainable residue harvest scenarios needed to establish sustainable residue availability. Using this computational tool, an assessment study of residue availability for the state of Iowa was performed. This study included all soil types in the state of Iowa, four representative crop rotation schemes, variable crop yields, three tillage management methods, and five residue removal methods. The key conclusions of this study are that under current management practices and crop yields nearly 26.5 million Mg of agricultural residue are sustainably accessible in the state of Iowa, and that through the adoption of no till practices residue removal could sustainably approach 40 million Mg. However, when considering the economics and logistics of residue harvest, yields below 2.25 Mg ha(-1) are generally considered to not be viable for a commercial bioenergy system. Applying this constraint, the total agricultural residue resource available in Iowa under current management practices is 19 million Mg. Previously published results have shown residue availability from 22 million Mg to over 50 million Mg in Iowa. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 69
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DEVELOPING AN INTEGRATED MODEL FRAMEWORK FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL RESIDUE REMOVAL LIMITS FOR BIOENERGY SYSTEMS
    Muth, David, Jr.
    McCorkle, Douglas
    Abodeely, Jared
    Koch, Joshua
    Nelson, Richard
    Bryden, Kenneth
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2011, VOL 2, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 259 - 268
  • [2] Sustainable agricultural residue removal for bioenergy: A spatially comprehensive US national assessment
    Muth, D. J., Jr.
    Bryden, K. M.
    Nelson, R. G.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 102 : 403 - 417
  • [3] Sustainable limits to crop residue harvest for bioenergy: maintaining soil carbon in Australia's agricultural lands
    Zhao, Gang
    Bryan, Brett A.
    King, Darran
    Luo, Zhongkui
    Wang, Enli
    Yu, Qiang
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2015, 7 (03): : 479 - 487
  • [4] Ecological assessment of integrated bioenergy systems using the Sustainable Process Index
    Krotscheck, C
    König, F
    Obernberger, I
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2000, 18 (04): : 341 - 368
  • [5] Modeling Sustainable Agricultural Residue Removal at the Subfield Scale
    Muth, D. J., Jr.
    McCorkle, D. S.
    Koch, J. B.
    Bryden, K. M.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2012, 104 (04) : 970 - 981
  • [6] A Conceptual Evaluation of Sustainable Variable-Rate Agricultural Residue Removal
    Muth, D., Jr.
    Bryden, K. M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2012, 41 (06) : 1796 - 1805
  • [7] Assessment of the bioenergy policy for the sustainable development of rural-based bioenergy systems in Zambia
    Kaoma, M.
    Gheewala, S. H.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY AND GREEN TECHNOLOGY 2019, 2020, 463
  • [8] Sustainable development of agricultural systems: competing objectives and critical limits
    Tait, J
    Morris, D
    FUTURES, 2000, 32 (3-4) : 247 - 260
  • [9] An integrated risk assessment model: A case of sustainable freight transportation systems
    Shankar, Ravi
    Choudhary, Divya
    Jharkharia, Sanjay
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 63 : 662 - 676
  • [10] A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development
    Krajnc, D
    Glavic, P
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2005, 43 (02) : 189 - 208