A STAT inhibitor patent review: progress since 2011

被引:45
|
作者
Lai, Ping-Shan [1 ]
Rosa, David A. [1 ]
Ali, Ahmed Magdy [1 ]
Gomez-Biagi, Rodolfo F. [1 ]
Ball, Daniel P. [1 ]
Shouksmith, Andrew E. [1 ]
Gunning, Patrick T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Chem & Phys Sci, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada
关键词
anti-cancer drugs; cancer therapeutics; JAK; STAT pathway; molecular therapeutics; oncogene; protein-protein interactions; signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3); PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS; SMALL-MOLECULE INHIBITOR; MULTIPLE-MYELOMA CELLS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCER; CANCER-CELLS; SH2; DOMAIN; TRANSCRIPTION; ANTITUMOR-ACTIVITY; LUNG-CANCER; IN-VITRO;
D O I
10.1517/13543776.2015.1086749
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Introduction: The clinical utility of effective direct STAT inhibitors, particularly STAT3 and STAT5, for treating cancer and other diseases is well studied and known.Areas covered: This review will highlight the STAT inhibitor patent literature from 2011 to 2015 inclusive. Emphasis will be placed on inhibitors of the STAT3, STAT5a/b, and STAT1 proteins for cancer treatment. The review will, where suitably investigated, describe the mode and the site of inhibition, list indications that were evaluated, and rank the inhibitor's relative potency among compounds in the same class. The reader will gain an understanding of the diverse set of approaches, used both in academia and industry, to target STAT proteins.Expert opinion: There is still much work to be done to directly target the STAT3 and STAT5 proteins. As yet, there is still no direct STAT3 inhibitor in the clinic. While the SH2 domain remains a popular target for therapeutic intervention, the DNA-binding domain and N-terminal region are now attracting attention as possible sites for inhibition. Multiple putative STAT3 and STAT5 inhibitors have now been patented across a broad spectrum of chemotypes, each with their own advantages and limitations.
引用
收藏
页码:1397 / 1421
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A STAT inhibitor patent review: progress since 2011 (vol 25, pg 1397, 2015)
    Lai, P. S.
    Rosa, D. A.
    Ali, Magdy A.
    Gomez-Biagi, R. F.
    Ball, D. P.
    Shouksmith, A. E.
    Gunning, P. T.
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC PATENTS, 2015, 25 (12) : 1495 - 1495
  • [2] A FGFR1 inhibitor patent review: progress since 2010
    Yu, Tao
    Yang, Yanyan
    Liu, Yan
    Zhang, Yinfeng
    Xu, Hong
    Li, Mengpeng
    Ponnusamy, Murugavel
    Wang, Kun
    Wang, Xun
    Li, Pei-Feng
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC PATENTS, 2017, 27 (04) : 439 - 454
  • [3] Towards a new SI: a review of progress made since 2011
    Milton, Martin J. T.
    Davis, Richard
    Fletcher, Nick
    [J]. METROLOGIA, 2014, 51 (03) : R21 - R30
  • [4] Classification of the primary progressive aphasias: principles and review of progress since 2011
    Vandenberghe, Rik
    [J]. ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2016, 8
  • [5] Classification of the primary progressive aphasias: principles and review of progress since 2011
    Rik Vandenberghe
    [J]. Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, 8
  • [6] Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: a review on the progress of patent literature (2011-2016)
    Lomelino, Carrie
    McKenna, Robert
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC PATENTS, 2016, 26 (08) : 947 - 956
  • [7] Research Progress of Electromagnetic Forming Technique Since 2011
    Xiong Q.
    Tang H.
    Wang M.
    Huang H.
    Jiang J.
    Qiu L.
    [J]. Gaodianya Jishu/High Voltage Engineering, 2019, 45 (04): : 1171 - 1181
  • [8] The review of IFMFC activities since 2011
    Watanabe, Tsuneo
    [J]. Progress in Superconductivity and Cryogenics (PSAC), 2024, 26 (03): : 1 - 4
  • [9] Cryogenic thermometry: A review of progress since 1982
    Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, NW14-1209, 170 Albany Street, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, United States
    [J]. Cryogenics, 7 (341-356):
  • [10] Cryogenic thermometry: a review of progress since 1982
    Rubin, LG
    [J]. CRYOGENICS, 1997, 37 (07) : 341 - 356