The selection of technology forecasting method using a multi-criteria interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making approach

被引:65
|
作者
Intepe, Gizem [1 ]
Bozdag, Erhan [2 ]
Koc, Tufan [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Engn Math, TR-34469 Istanbul, Maslak, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34367 Istanbul, Macka, Turkey
关键词
Technology forecasting; Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets; Fuzzy TOPSIS; 3D TV; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; RANK REVERSAL; AHP; TOPSIS; STRATEGY; FUTURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2013.03.002
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Technological forecasting is a tool for organizations to develop their technology strategies. The quality of forecasting is extremely important for the accuracy of the results and in turn company future. Therefore a proper selection methodology of forecasting technique that considers the characteristics of technology and resources needed such as cost, time is essential. On the other hand, although many forecasting techniques are available, there is a high uncertainty in choosing the most appropriate technique among a set of available techniques. In this paper interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method is proposed for the solution of technological forecasting technique selection problem. The proposed method includes seven selection criteria and twelve forecasting technique alternatives. The methodology is applied for 3D TV technology. The results revealed that Fisher Pry method is found as the most appropriate method for forecasting since it has the highest closeness coefficient. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 285
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Multi-criteria Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision Making for Supplier Selection with TOPSIS Method
    Kavita
    Yadav, Shiv Prasad
    Kumar, Surendra
    ROUGH SETS, FUZZY SETS, DATA MINING AND GRANULAR COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5908 : 303 - +
  • [2] A multi-criteria group decision making procedure using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets
    Tan, Chunqiao
    Deng, Hepu
    Cao, Yu
    Journal of Computational Information Systems, 2010, 6 (03): : 855 - 863
  • [3] Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy mathematical programming method for hybrid multi-criteria group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees
    Wan, Shu-Ping
    Dong, Jiu-Ying
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2015, 26 : 49 - 65
  • [4] Multi-criteria decision making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets
    J. Priyadharsini
    P. Balasubramaniam
    The Journal of Analysis, 2019, 27 : 259 - 276
  • [5] Multi-criteria decision making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets
    Priyadharsini, J.
    Balasubramaniam, P.
    JOURNAL OF ANALYSIS, 2019, 27 (01): : 259 - 276
  • [6] Multi-criteria decision-making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets
    Nayagam, V. Lakshmana Gomathi
    Muralikrishnan, S.
    Sivaraman, Geetha
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (03) : 1464 - 1467
  • [7] An approach to multi-criteria decision-making under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and interval fuzzy measures
    Zhang, Shaolin
    Li, Xia
    Meng, Fanyong
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2016, 33 (04) : 253 - 270
  • [8] Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods Based on Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
    Tan, Chunqiao
    Ma, Benjiang
    Wu, Desheng Dash
    Chen, Xiaohong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2014, 22 (03) : 469 - 488
  • [9] Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision making
    Joshi, Deepa
    Kumar, Sanjay
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 248 (01) : 183 - 191
  • [10] Interval-Valued Atanassov Intuitionistic Fuzzy CODAS Method for Multi Criteria Group Decision Making Problems
    Fatma Betül Yeni
    Gökhan Özçelik
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2019, 28 : 433 - 452