Monte carlo simulation of the TRIGA mark II benchmark experiment with burned fuel

被引:20
|
作者
Jeraj, R [1 ]
Zagar, T [1 ]
Ravnik, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Jozef Stefan Inst, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
TRIGA mark II research reactor; burned fuel; Monte Carlo simulation;
D O I
10.13182/NT02-A3266
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Monte Carlo calculations of a criticality experiment with burned fuel on the TRIGA Mark II research reactor are presented. The main objective was to incorporate burned fuel composition calculated with the WIMSD4 deterministic code into the MCNP4B Monte Carlo code and compare the calculated k(eff) with the measurements. The criticality experiment was performed in 1998 at the "Jozef Stefan" Institute TRIGA Mark II reactor in Ljubljana, Slovenia, with the same fuel elements and loading pattern as in the TRIGA criticality benchmark experiment with fresh fuel performed in 1991. The only difference was that in 1998, the fuel elements had on average burnup of similar to3%, corresponding to 1.3-MWd energy produced in the core in the period between 1991 and 1998. The fuel element burnup accumulated during 1991-1998 was calculated with the TRIGLAV in-house-developed fuel management two-dimensional multigroup diffusion code. The burned fuel isotopic composition was calculated with the WIMSD4 code and compared to the ORIGEN2 calculations. Extensive comparison of burned fuel material composition was performed for both codes for burnups up to 20% burned 211 U, and the differences were evaluated in terms of reactivity. The WIMSD4 and ORIGEN2 results agreed well for all isotopes important in reactivity calculations, giving increased confidence in the WIMSD4 calculation of the burned fuel material composition. The keff calculated with the combined WIMSD4 and MCNP4B calculations showed good agreement with the experimental values. This shows that linking of WIMSD4 with MCNP4B for criticality calculations with burned fuel is feasible and gives reliable results.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 180
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Monte Carlo simulation of the TRIGA Mark II benchmark experiment
    Jeraj, R
    Glumac, B
    Maucec, M
    [J]. NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 120 (03) : 179 - 187
  • [2] TRIGA Mark II criticality benchmark experiment with burned fuel
    Persic, A
    Ravnik, M
    Zagar, T
    [J]. NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 132 (03) : 325 - 338
  • [3] MCNP simulation of the TRIGA Mark II benchmark experiment
    Jeraj, R
    Glumac, B
    Maucec, M
    [J]. 3RD REGIONAL MEETING NUCLEAR ENERGY IN CENTRAL EUROPE / ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NUCLEAR SOCIETY OF SLOVENIA, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 66 - 73
  • [4] Benchmark analysis of TRIGA mark II reactivity experiment using a continuous energy Monte Carlo code MCNP
    Matsumoto, T
    Hayakawa, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 37 (12) : 1082 - 1087
  • [5] Benchmark analysis of the TRIGA MARK II research reactor using Monte Carlo techniques
    Huda, MQ
    Rahman, M
    Sarker, MM
    Bhuiyan, SI
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2004, 31 (11) : 1299 - 1313
  • [6] MCNP simulation of DIMPLE and TRIGA Mark II benchmark experiments
    Maucec, M
    Jeraj, R
    Glumac, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR DATA FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL 59, PT 1 AND 2, 1997, 59 : 1177 - 1179
  • [7] Monte Carlo simulation of the thermal column and beam tube of the TRIGA Mark II research reactor
    Khan, R.
    Karimzadeh, S.
    Stummer, T.
    Boeck, H.
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2011, 241 (08) : 2859 - 2864
  • [8] Benchmark analysis of criticality experiments in the TRIGA mark II using a continuous energy Monte Carlo code MCNP
    Matsumoto, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 35 (09) : 662 - 670
  • [9] Fuel Burnup Calculation in ITU TRIGA Mark II Research Reactor by Using Monte Carlo Method
    Turkmen, Mehmet
    Colak, Uner
    [J]. 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE NUCLEAR ENERGY FOR NEW EUROPE, (NENE 2014), 2014,
  • [10] TRIGA MARK-II BENCHMARK EXPERIMENT .2. PULSE OPERATION
    MELE, I
    RAVNIK, M
    TRKOV, A
    [J]. NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 105 (01) : 52 - 58