Costing the implementation of public health interventions in resource-limited settings: a conceptual framework

被引:44
|
作者
Sohn, Hojoon [1 ]
Tucker, Austin [1 ]
Ferguson, Olivia [1 ]
Gomes, Isabella [1 ]
Dowdy, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 615 N Wolfe St E6531, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
Implementation strategies; Costs of implementation; Economic evaluation; Decision-making; Tuberculosis; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; HIV-PREVENTION; TUBERCULOSIS; STRATEGIES; DIAGNOSIS; AFRICA; AVAHAN;
D O I
10.1186/s13012-020-01047-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Failing to account for the resources required to successfully implement public health interventions can lead to an underestimation of costs and budget impact, optimistic cost-effectiveness estimates, and ultimately a disconnect between published evidence and public health decision-making. Methods: We developed a conceptual framework for assessing implementation costs. We illustrate the use of this framework with case studies involving interventions for tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS in resource-limited settings. Results: Costs of implementing public health interventions may be conceptualized as occurring across three phases: design, initiation, and maintenance. In the design phase, activities include developing intervention components and establishing necessary infrastructure (e.g., technology, standard operating procedures). Initiation phase activities include training, initiation of supply chains and quality assurance procedures, and installation of equipment. Implementation costs in the maintenance phase include ongoing technical support, monitoring and evaluation, and troubleshooting unexpected obstacles. Within each phase, implementation costs can be incurred at the site of delivery ("site-specific" costs) or more centrally ("above-service" or "central" costs). For interventions evaluated in the context of research studies, implementation costs should be classified as programmatic, research-related, or shared research/program costs. Purely research-related costs are often excluded from analysis of programmatic implementation. Conclusions: In evaluating public health interventions in resource-limited settings, accounting for implementation costs enables more realistic estimates of budget impact and cost-effectiveness and provides important insights into program feasibility, scale-up, and sustainability. Assessment of implementation costs should be planned prospectively and performed in a standardized manner to ensure generalizability.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Costing the implementation of public health interventions in resource-limited settings: a conceptual framework
    Hojoon Sohn
    Austin Tucker
    Olivia Ferguson
    Isabella Gomes
    David Dowdy
    Implementation Science, 15
  • [2] Enhancing the implementation and integration of mHealth interventions in resource-limited settings: a scoping review
    Wilson Tumuhimbise
    Stefanie Theuring
    Fred Kaggwa
    Esther C. Atukunda
    John Rubaihayo
    Daniel Atwine
    Juliet N. Sekandi
    Angella Musiimenta
    Implementation Science, 19 (1)
  • [3] Settings, populations, and time: a conceptual framework for public health interventions
    Aagaard-Hansen, Jens
    Bloch, Paul
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [4] The Technology Acceptance Model for Resource-Limited Settings (TAM-RLS): A Novel Framework for Mobile Health Interventions Targeted to Low-Literacy End-Users in Resource-Limited Settings
    Jeffrey I. Campbell
    Isaac Aturinda
    Evans Mwesigwa
    Bridget Burns
    Data Santorino
    Jessica E. Haberer
    David R. Bangsberg
    Richard J. Holden
    Norma C. Ware
    Mark J. Siedner
    AIDS and Behavior, 2017, 21 : 3129 - 3140
  • [5] The Technology Acceptance Model for Resource-Limited Settings (TAM-RLS): A Novel Framework for Mobile Health Interventions Targeted to Low-Literacy End-Users in Resource-Limited Settings
    Campbell, Jeffrey I.
    Aturinda, Isaac
    Mwesigwa, Evans
    Burns, Bridget
    Santorino, Data
    Haberer, Jessica E.
    Bangsberg, David R.
    Holden, Richard J.
    Ware, Norma C.
    Siedner, Mark J.
    AIDS AND BEHAVIOR, 2017, 21 (11) : 3129 - 3140
  • [6] A global health delivery framework approach to epilepsy care in resource-limited settings
    Cochran, Maggie F.
    Berkowitz, Aaron L.
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 358 (1-2) : 263 - 265
  • [7] Antiretroviral guidelines for resource-limited settings:: The WHO's public health approach
    Hammer, SM
    Türmen, T
    Vareldzis, B
    Perriens, J
    NATURE MEDICINE, 2002, 8 (07) : 649 - 650
  • [8] Viral load monitoring in resource-limited settings: a medical and public health priority
    Ford, Nathan
    Roberts, Teri
    Calmy, Alexandra
    AIDS, 2012, 26 (13) : 1719 - 1720
  • [9] Antiretroviral guidelines for resource-limited settings: The WHO's public health approach
    Scott M. Hammer
    Tomris Türmen
    Basil Vareldzis
    Jos Perriens
    Nature Medicine, 2002, 8 : 649 - 650
  • [10] Role of nurse informaticists in the implementation of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) at resource-limited settings
    Asif, Kiran Bano
    Khan, Haroon
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 40 (09) : 2156 - 2159