Patient feedback for safety improvement in primary care: results from a feasibility study

被引:17
|
作者
Hernan, Andrea L. [1 ]
Giles, Sally J. [2 ]
Beks, Hannah [1 ]
McNamara, Kevin [1 ]
Kloot, Kate [3 ]
Binder, Marley J. [1 ]
Versace, Vincent [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Deakin Rural Hlth, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Manchester, NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safe, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Deakin Univ, Ctr Rural Emergency Med, Warrnambool, Vic, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 06期
关键词
quality in health care; primary care; qualitative research; health services administration & management; STATISTICAL PROCESS-CONTROL; PRIMARY-HEALTH-CARE; EXPERIENCE SURVEYS; QUALITY; CHALLENGES; INCIDENTS; SETTINGS; FAMILIES; TOOL;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037887
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Patient involvement in safety improvement is a developing area of research. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a patient feedback on safety intervention in primary care. Specifically, the intervention acceptability, fidelity, implementation enablers and barriers, scalability, and process of systematically collecting safety data were examined. Design, setting and participants Mixed-methods feasibility trial with six purposively selected Australian primary care practices. Intervention The intervention comprised an iterative process with a cycle of measurement, learning, feedback, action planning and implementation period of 6months. Primary and secondary outcomes Qualitative and quantitative data relating to feasibility measures (acceptability, fidelity, enablers, barriers, scalability and process of collecting safety data) were collected and analysed. Results A total of n=1750 patients provided feedback on safety. There was a statistically significant increase in mean patient safety scores indicating improved safety (4.30-4.37, p=0.002). Staff deemed the intervention acceptable, with minor recommendations for improvement. Intervention fidelity was high and implementation enablers were attributed to the intervention structure and framework, use of intuitive problem-solving approaches, and multidisciplinary team involvement. Practice-based safety interventions resulted in sustainable and measurable changes to systems for safety, such as increased access to care and improved patient information accuracy. Conclusions The findings indicate that this innovative patient feedback on safety intervention is feasible for scale-up to a larger effectiveness trial and further spread into policy and practice. This intervention complements existing safety improvement strategies and activities, and integrates into current patient feedback service requirements for Australian primary care. Further research is needed to examine the intervention effects on safety incident reduction.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient feedback on safety as a tool for improvement in primary care: results from a feasibility trial
    Hernan, Andrea L.
    Giles, Sally
    Beks, Hannah
    McNamara, Kevin
    Versace, Vincent L.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2019, 25 (03) : XIX - XX
  • [2] Investigating the feasibility of a patient feedback tool to improve safety in Australian primary care: a study protocol
    Hernan, Andrea L.
    Kloot, Kate
    Giles, Sally J.
    Beks, Hannah
    McNamara, Kevin
    Binder, Marley J.
    Versace, Vincent
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (05):
  • [3] FEASIBILITY STUDY OF METHOTREXATE USE IMPROVEMENT IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (MIRA) USING BIOMARKER FEEDBACK: QUALITATIVE RESULTS FROM PATIENT INTERVIEWS
    Bluett, J.
    Doran, P.
    Hyrich, K.
    Keevil, B.
    Barton, A.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2023, 82 : 1428 - 1429
  • [4] Medication Safety in Primary Care Practice: Results From a PPRNet Quality Improvement Intervention
    Wessell, Andrea M.
    Ornstein, Steven M.
    Jenkins, Ruth G.
    Nemeth, Lynne S.
    Litvin, Cara B.
    Nietert, Paul J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2013, 28 (01) : 16 - 24
  • [5] Patient safety improvement programmes for primary care. Review of a Delphi procedure and pilot studies by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care
    Verstappen, Wim
    Gaal, Sander
    Esmail, Aneez
    Wensing, Michel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2015, 21 : 50 - 55
  • [6] Improvement of the Patient Safety Culture in the Primary Health Care Corporation - Qatar
    El Zoghbi, Mohamad
    Farooq, Saad
    Abulaban, Ali
    Taha, Heba
    Ajanaz, Sajna
    Aljasmi, Jawaher
    Ahmad, Shakil
    Said, Hana
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2021, 17 (08) : E1376 - E1382
  • [7] Protocol for a non-randomised feasibility study evaluating a codesigned patient safety guide in primary care
    Morris, Rebecca L.
    Gallacher, Kay
    Hann, Mark
    Rolfe, Carly
    Small, Nicola
    Giles, Sally J.
    Sanders, Caroline
    Campbell, Stephen M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (01):
  • [8] Exploring primary health care professionals' perceptions about a patient feedback intervention to improve patient safety in Spanish primary health care centres: a qualitative study
    Serrano-Ripoll, Maria J.
    Ripoll, Joana
    Briones-Vozmediano, Erica
    Llobera, Joan
    Fiol-deRoque, Maria A.
    Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2020, 37 (06) : 821 - 827
  • [9] Patient safety in Dutch primary care: a study protocol
    Harmsen, Mirjam
    Gaal, Sander
    van Dulmen, Simone
    de Feijter, Eimert
    Giesen, Paul
    Jacobs, Annelies
    Martijn, Lucie
    Mettes, Theodorus
    Verstappen, Wim
    Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Ria
    Wensing, Michel
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2010, 5
  • [10] Patient safety in Dutch primary care: a study protocol
    Mirjam Harmsen
    Sander Gaal
    Simone van Dulmen
    Eimert de Feijter
    Paul Giesen
    Annelies Jacobs
    Lucie Martijn
    Theodorus Mettes
    Wim Verstappen
    Ria Nijhuis-van der Sanden
    Michel Wensing
    Implementation Science, 5