Individual differences in approach and avoidance movements: How the avoidance motive influences response force

被引:36
|
作者
Puca, Rosa Maria
Rinkenauer, Gerhard
Breidenstein, Christian
机构
[1] Univ Dortmund, Inst Occupat Physiol, D-44139 Dortmund, Germany
[2] Univ Tubingen, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00400.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present research is based on the assumption that people differ in their responsiveness to incentives and threats. In two experiments we examined whether the trait corresponding to the responsiveness to threats (avoidance motive) and the trait corresponding to the responsiveness to incentives (approach motive) influence voluntary motor behavior toward or away from stimuli. In Experiment 1, stimuli consisted of positive and negative words within a lexical decision task. Participants moved their arms backward in order to withdraw from the stimuli or forward in order to approach them. In Experiment 2, participants responded with forward or backward arm movements to neutral sounds coming from behind or in front of them. The main dependent variable was the strength of the approach and avoidance movements. In both experiments this variable was related to participants' avoidance-motive disposition but not to their approach-motive disposition. Avoidance-motivated individuals generally showed more forceful avoidance movements than approach movements. There was no effect of stimulus valence on the strength of the movements in Experiment 1. Furthermore, the results of Experiment 2 suggest that it is not the physical direction (forward or backward) but rather the movement's effect of distance reduction (approach) or distance increase (avoidance) in regard to the stimulus that defines a movement as an approach or an avoidance movement.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 1014
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Individual differences in incompetence avoidance
    Kaye, Miranda P.
    Conroy, David E.
    Fifer, Angela M.
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 30 (01): : 110 - 132
  • [2] Approach, avoidance, and self-regulatory conflict: An individual differences perspective
    Robinson, Michael D.
    Wilkowski, Benjamin M.
    Meier, Brian P.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 44 (01) : 65 - 79
  • [3] Individual and Sex Differences in the Consequences of Victimization: Moderation by Approach and Avoidance Motivation
    Llewellyn, Nicole
    Rudolph, Karen D.
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 50 (09) : 2210 - 2220
  • [4] Individual differences in response to positive and negative stimuli: endocannabinoid-based insight on approach and avoidance behaviors
    Laricchiuta, Daniela
    Petrosini, Laura
    FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
  • [5] AVOIDANCE AND ESCAPE: INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN DEFENSIVE BEHAVIOR
    Sege, Christopher
    Bradley, Margaret
    Lang, Peter
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 54 : S151 - S151
  • [6] EFFECT OF RESPONSE FORCE ON AVOIDANCE RATE
    MILLER, LK
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1968, 11 (06) : 809 - &
  • [7] Competition avoidance drives individual differences in response to a changing food resource in sticklebacks
    Laskowski, Kate L.
    Bell, Alison M.
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2013, 16 (06) : 746 - 753
  • [8] Approach-avoidance individual differences in changing students' responses to physical education
    Robazza, Claudio
    Bortoli, Laura
    Carraro, Attilio
    Bertollo, Maurizio
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2007, 104 (03) : 937 - 946
  • [9] Agency influences vicarious approach/avoidance effects
    Zogmaister, Cristina
    Vezzoli, Michela
    Bading, Karoline
    Perugini, Marco
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2023, 37 (08) : 1299 - 1314
  • [10] Caution Influences Avoidance and Approach Behaviors Differently
    Zhou, Ji
    Hormigo, Sebastian
    Sajid, Muhammad S.
    Castro-Alamancos, Manuel A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 42 (30): : 5899 - 5915