DO WE REALLY NEED MORE TRAINING DATA FOR OBJECT LOCALIZATION

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Hongyang [1 ]
Liu, Yu [1 ]
Zhang, Xin [2 ]
An, Zhecheng [2 ]
Wang, Jingjing [2 ]
Chen, Yibo [1 ]
Tong, Jihong [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Eastern Liaoning Univ, Dandong, Peoples R China
关键词
Deep learning; computer vision; object localization; image recognition;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TB8 [摄影技术];
学科分类号
0804 ;
摘要
The key factor for training a good neural network lies in both model capacity and large-scale training data. As more datasets are available nowadays, one may wonder whether the success of deep learning descends from data augmentation only. In this paper, we propose a new dataset, namely, Extended ImageNet Classification (EIC) dataset based on the original ILSVRC CLS 2012 set to investigate if more training data is a crucial step. We address the problem of object localization where given an image, some boxes (also called anchors) are generated to localize multiple instances. Different from previous work to place all anchors at the last layer, we split boxes of different sizes at various resolutions in the network, since small anchors are more prone to be identified at larger spatial location in the shallow layers. Inspired by the hourglass work, we apply a conv-deconv network architecture to generate object proposals. The motivation is to fully leverage high-level summarized semantics and to utilize their up-sampling version to help guide local details in the low-level maps. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of such a design. Based on the newly proposed dataset, we find more data could enhance the average recall, but a more balanced data distribution among categories could obtain better results at the cost of fewer training samples.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 779
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do We Need More Training Data or Better Models for Object Detection?
    Zhu, Xiangxin
    Vondrick, Carl
    Ramanan, Deva
    Fowlkes, Charless C.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH MACHINE VISION CONFERENCE 2012, 2012,
  • [2] Do We Need More Training Data?
    Zhu, Xiangxin
    Vondrick, Carl
    Fowlkes, Charless C.
    Ramanan, Deva
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, 2016, 119 (01) : 76 - 92
  • [3] Do We Need More Training Data?
    Xiangxin Zhu
    Carl Vondrick
    Charless C. Fowlkes
    Deva Ramanan
    [J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2016, 119 : 76 - 92
  • [4] Do we really need more research?
    Esposito, Marco
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2014, 7 (03) : 223 - 223
  • [5] DO WE REALLY NEED MORE BUREAUCRACY
    AREY, SL
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 1976, 58 (04) : 632 - 632
  • [6] Do We Really Need More Biomarkers?
    O'Connor, Christopher M.
    [J]. JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2013, 1 (03) : 270 - 271
  • [7] DO WE REALLY NEED MORE PEDIATRICIANS
    HAGGERTY, RJ
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 1972, 50 (05) : 681 - &
  • [8] DO WE REALLY NEED MORE REPLICATIONS
    HUNT, K
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1975, 36 (02) : 587 - 593
  • [9] DO WE REALLY NEED MORE PHYSICS TEACHERS
    PHILLIPS, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1970, 38 (01) : 124 - &
  • [10] DO WE REALLY NEED MORE HOSPITAL BEDS
    HASTINGS, S
    [J]. LANCET, 1955, 2 (DEC10): : 1240 - 1241