Age-related differences in bimanual coordination performance

被引:4
|
作者
Danuta, Roman-Liu [1 ]
Tokarski, Tomasz [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Inst CIOP PIB, Cent Inst Labour Protect, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
two-hand coordination; elderly; rehabilitation; electromyography; occupational health; PSYCHOSOCIAL STRESS; MOVEMENTS; BRAIN; WORK; NECK;
D O I
10.1080/10803548.2020.1759296
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Purpose. The purpose of this article was to determine how characteristics of bimanual coordination tasks affect the quality of performance and to determine the impact of these characteristics on muscular activation of the upper limbs, with consideration of age-related differences.Methods. The research was carried out on two groups consisting of 25 people aged 20-30 and 60-67 years. The subjects performed seven tasks that varied in coordination mode, tracking mode and outline-tracing. The main measures of task performance were calculated on the basis of the difference between the position of the target and tracing cursors. Cohen'sdvalue was calculated to show differences in measures between groups.Results. There were higher values of error and variability measures for elderly people compared to young. Complex tasks showed the largest difficulty, which suggests that, when performed, such tasks have the greatest potential to improve coordination skills. Tasks during which both limbs contribute to the movement of one cursor proved the most appropriate.Conclusion. The tracking mode is of great importance for the quality of performance in motor coordination tasks, while the performance of tasks with imposed speed is much more strongly age-sensitive than performance with a freely chosen speed.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 632
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Age-related differences in the reaching and grasping coordination in children: unimanual and bimanual tasks
    Olivier, Isabelle
    Hay, Laurette
    Bard, Chantal
    Fleury, Michelle
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 179 (01) : 17 - 27
  • [2] Age-related differences in the reaching and grasping coordination in children: unimanual and bimanual tasks
    Isabelle Olivier
    Laurette Hay
    Chantal Bard
    Michelle Fleury
    [J]. Experimental Brain Research, 2007, 179 : 17 - 27
  • [3] Age-related differences and the role of augmented visual feedback in learning a bimanual coordination pattern
    Wishart, LR
    Lee, TD
    Cunningham, SJ
    Murdoch, JE
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2002, 110 (2-3) : 247 - 263
  • [4] Age-related differences in the integration of sensory information during the execution of a bimanual coordination task
    Serrien, DJ
    Teasdale, N
    Bard, C
    Fleury, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR, 1996, 28 (04) : 337 - 347
  • [5] Age-related deficits in motor learning and differences in feedback processing during the production of a bimanual coordination pattern
    Swinnen, SP
    Verschueren, SMP
    Bogaerts, H
    Dounskaia, N
    Lee, TD
    Stelmach, GE
    Serrien, DJ
    [J]. COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 15 (05) : 439 - 466
  • [6] AGE-DIFFERENCES IN BIMANUAL COORDINATION
    STELMACH, GE
    AMRHEIN, PC
    GOGGIN, NL
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY, 1988, 43 (01): : P18 - P23
  • [7] Age-related differences in the availability of visual feedback during bimanual pinch
    Critchley, Kazumi
    Kokubu, Masahiro
    Iemitsu, Motoyuki
    Fujita, Satoshi
    Isaka, Tadao
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 114 (09) : 1925 - 1932
  • [8] Age-related differences in the availability of visual feedback during bimanual pinch
    Kazumi Critchley
    Masahiro Kokubu
    Motoyuki Iemitsu
    Satoshi Fujita
    Tadao Isaka
    [J]. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2014, 114 : 1925 - 1932
  • [9] AGE-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN MENTAL PERFORMANCE
    FOZARD, JL
    NUTTALL, RL
    WAUGH, NC
    [J]. AGING AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1972, 3 (01): : 19 - 43
  • [10] Age-related differences in bimanual movements: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Krehbiel, Lisa M.
    Kang, Nyeonju
    Cauraugh, James H.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY, 2017, 98 : 199 - 206