Performance of an automated chemiluminescence SARS-CoV-2 IG-G assay

被引:18
|
作者
Lau, C. S. [1 ]
Oh, H. M. L. [2 ]
Hoo, S. P. [1 ]
Liang, Y. L. [1 ]
Phua, S. K. [1 ]
Aw, T. C. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Changi Gen Hosp, Dept Lab Med, 2 Simei St 3, Singapore 529889, Singapore
[2] Changi Gen Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Med, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Duke NUS Med Sch, Acad Pathol Program, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; Antibodies; Assay evaluation; Reactivity index;
D O I
10.1016/j.cca.2020.09.005
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction: We describe our evaluation of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay on the Architect immunoassay analyser. Methods: We assessed assay precision, sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV), cross-reactivity (influenza/dengue/hepatitis B and C/rheumatoid factor/anti-nuclear/double-stranded DNA/syphilis) and sample throughput in samples from real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) positive patients/healthcare workers (HCWs)/pre-pandemic samples. We compared the cut-off indexes (COIs) between all control samples (HCWs and pre-pandemic) to generate an optimised COI limit for reactivity. Results: The assay specificity was 99.8% (n = 980) and sensitivity was 45.9-96.7% (n = 279). When tested >= 14 days post-positive RT-PCR (POS), the PPV/NPV was 96.4%/99.8%. The difference between the COIs of HCWs/pre-pandemic samples was small (0.01, p < 0.0001). There was minimal cross-reactivity with other antibodies. A lower COI limit for reactivity (>= 0.55, using the 99th percentile COI of our controls and ROC analysis) improved diagnostic sensitivity, especially at 0-6 days POS (45.9-55.8%), with a small decrease in specificity (98.9%). The assay throughput was 100 samples in 70 min. Conclusion: The Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay shows excellent performance in patients >= 14 days POS. The difference between the COIs of HCWs and pre-pandemic samples was numerically small. A lower COI limit improves assay sensitivity with a slight decrease in specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:760 / 766
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance of two rapid point of care SARS-COV-2 antibody assays against laboratory-based automated chemiluminescent immunoassays for SARS-COV-2 IG-G, IG-M and total antibodies
    Lau, C. S.
    Hoo, S. P.
    Liang, Y. L.
    Phua, S. K.
    Aw, T. C.
    PRACTICAL LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 24
  • [2] Treating Critically Ill Patients Experiencing SARS-CoV-2 Severe Infection with Ig-M and Ig-A Enriched Ig-G Infusion
    Corona, Alberto
    Richini, Giuseppe
    Simoncini, Sara
    Zangrandi, Marta
    Biasini, Monica
    Russo, Giuseppe
    Pasqua, Mauro
    Santorsola, Clemente
    Gregorini, Camilla
    Giordano, Chiara
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2021, 10 (08):
  • [3] Clinical Performance of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM Tests Using an Automated Chemiluminescent Assay
    Zhou, Jin-an
    Zeng, Hao-long
    Deng, Ling-yan
    Li, Hui-jun
    CURRENT MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 41 (02) : 318 - 322
  • [4] Clinical Performance of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM Tests Using an Automated Chemiluminescent Assay
    Jin-an Zhou
    Hao-long Zeng
    Ling-yan Deng
    Hui-jun Li
    Current Medical Science, 2021, 41 : 318 - 322
  • [5] SARS-CoV-2 Ig G among Healthcare Workers and the General Population
    Milani, Gregorio P.
    Bianchetti, Mario G.
    Togni, Giuseppe
    Schoenenberger, Andreas W.
    Muggli, Franco
    PATHOGENS, 2021, 10 (04):
  • [6] Comparison of Allplex SARS-CoV-2 Assay, Easy SARS-CoV-2 WE and Lumipulse quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test performance using automated systems for the diagnosis of COVID-19
    Sberna, Giuseppe
    Basile, Flavia
    Guarino, Maria Luisa
    Capobianchi, Maria Rosaria
    Bordi, Licia
    Parisi, Gabriella
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 113 : 113 - 115
  • [7] Clinical Performance of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assay
    Tang, Mei San
    Hock, Karl G.
    Logsdon, Nicole M.
    Hayes, Jennifer E.
    Gronowski, Ann M.
    Anderson, Neil W.
    Farnsworth, Christopher W.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 66 (08) : 1107 - 1109
  • [8] Performance and application evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay
    Ye, Qing
    Shao, Wenxia
    Meng, Hanyan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2022, 94 (08) : 3548 - 3553
  • [9] Evaluation of Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay automated test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP) in nasopharyngeal swabs for community and population screening
    Gili, Alessio
    Paggi, Riccardo
    Russo, Carla
    Cenci, Elio
    Pietrella, Donatella
    Graziani, Alessandro
    Stracci, Fabrizio
    Mencacci, Antonella
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 105 : 391 - 396
  • [10] Diagnostic performance of an automated chemiluminescence immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies detection: A real life experience
    Villalta, Danilo
    Martelli, Paola
    Moratto, Anna
    Salgarolo, Valeria
    Ligato, Elita
    Conte, Mariaelisabetta
    Giacomello, Roberto
    Pellis, Tommaso
    De Rosa, Rita
    Venturini, Sergio
    Crapis, Massimo
    PRACTICAL LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 25