Multiple-choice testing can improve the retention of nontested related information

被引:0
|
作者
Little, Jeri L. [1 ]
Bjork, Elizabeth Ligon [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Psychol, 1285 Franz Hall,Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
来源
关键词
memory; testing effects; prose passages; RIF; TEST FORMAT; RETRIEVAL; FACILITATION; RECALL; MEMORY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Taking an initial test leads to improved performance on later tests for those previously tested questions. Whether prior testing improves one's ability to answer related questions, however, is less clear, with some results showing impairment for related information, an effect called retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF; e.g., Anderson, Bjork, & Bjork, 1994). Two experiments investigated the use of initial multiple-choice tests on the retention of previously studied prose passages, specifically on the retention of related, but initially nontested information. In both experiments, an incorrect alternative on the initial test served as the correct answer to a related question on the final test. Results demonstrated that the retention of related information can, indeed, be facilitated by initial multiple- choice tests (Experiment 1) and that this benefit is dependant upon using competitive incorrect alternatives (Experiment 2). We discuss how and why our results differ from previous work (e.g., RIF) and address possible educational applications.
引用
收藏
页码:1535 / 1540
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Testing Effect in University Teaching: Using Multiple-Choice Testing to Promote Retention of Highly Retrievable Information
    Greving, Sven
    Lenhard, Wolfgang
    Richter, Tobias
    TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 50 (04) : 332 - 341
  • [2] MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTING
    AKEROYD, FM
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 1984, 61 (05) : 475 - 475
  • [3] Can you beat guessing in multiple-choice testing?
    Mackey, BA
    GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ROUND TABLE ON LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS 1999: LANGUAGE IN OUR TIME: BILINGUAL EDUCATION AND OFFICIAL ENGLISH, EBONICS AND STANDARD ENGLISH, IMMIGRATION AND THE UNZ INITIATIVE, 2001, : 59 - 70
  • [4] Multiple-choice pretesting potentiates learning of related information
    Little, Jeri L.
    Bjork, Elizabeth Ligon
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2016, 44 (07) : 1085 - 1101
  • [5] Multiple-choice pretesting potentiates learning of related information
    Jeri L. Little
    Elizabeth Ligon Bjork
    Memory & Cognition, 2016, 44 : 1085 - 1101
  • [6] REEXAMINATION OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTING
    WOMER, FB
    EDUCATION, 1970, 90 (04): : 285 - 289
  • [7] THE USE OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE FOR TESTING
    TRIEBER, JM
    TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 1980, 34 (10): : 24 - 28
  • [8] Knowledge Assessment: Squeezing Information From Multiple-Choice Testing
    Nickerson, Raymond S.
    Butler, Susan F.
    Carlin, Michael T.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2015, 21 (02) : 167 - 177
  • [9] MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTING IN ANATOMY
    NNODIM, JO
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1992, 26 (04) : 301 - 309
  • [10] Multiple-choice Testing: Knowledge, or Random Choice?
    Simonova, Ivana
    2014 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON), 2014, : 819 - 823