Proficiency Testing of Standardized Samples Shows High Interlaboratory Agreement for Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Hematologic Malignancy Assays With Survey Material-Specific Differences in Variant Frequencies

被引:6
|
作者
Keegan, Alissa [1 ]
Bridge, Julia A. [2 ,3 ]
Lindeman, Neal, I [1 ]
Long, Thomas A. [4 ]
Merker, Jason D. [6 ]
Moncur, Joel T. [8 ]
Montgomery, Nathan D. [7 ]
Nagarajan, Rakesh [9 ]
Rothberg, Paul G. [10 ]
Routbort, Mark J. [11 ]
Vasalos, Patricia [5 ]
Xian, Rena [12 ]
Kim, Annette S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Pathol, Brigham & Womens Hosp, 75 Francis St,Thorn 613A, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Omaha, NE USA
[3] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Microbiol, Omaha, NE USA
[4] Coll Amer Pathologists, Biostat, Northfield, IL USA
[5] Coll Amer Pathologists, Proficiency Testing, Northfield, IL USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, UNC Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[7] Univ N Carolina, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[8] Joint Pathol Ctr, Silver Spring, MD USA
[9] PierianDx, Dept Pathol, St Louis, MO USA
[10] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Strong Mem Hosp, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[11] MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hematopathol, Houston, TX USA
[12] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.5858/arpa.2019-0352-CP
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Context.-As laboratories increasingly turn from single-analyte testing in hematologic malignancies to next-generation sequencing-based panel testing, there is a corresponding need for proficiency testing to ensure adequate performance of these next-generation sequencing assays for optimal patient care. Objective.-To report the performance of laboratories on proficiency testing from the first 4 College of American Pathologists Next-Generation Sequencing Hematologic Malignancy surveys. Design.-College of American Pathologists proficiency testing results for 36 different engineered variants and/or allele fractions as well as a sample with no pathogenic variants were analyzed for accuracy and associated assay performance characteristics. Results.-The overall sensitivity observed for all variants was 93.5% (2190 of 2341) with 99.8% specificity (22 800 of 22 840). The false-negative rate was 6.5% (151 of 2341), and the largest single cause of these errors was difficulty in identifying variants in the sequence of CEBPA that is rich in cytosines and guanines. False-positive results (0.18%; 40 of 22 840) were most likely the result of preanalytic or postanalytic errors. Interestingly, the variant allele fractions were almost uniformly lower than the engineered fraction (as measured by digital polymerase chain reaction). Extensive troubleshooting identified a multifactorial cause for the low variant allele fractions, a result of an interaction between the linearized nature of the plasmid and the Illumina TruSeq chemistry. Conclusions.-Laboratories demonstrated an overall accuracy of 99.2% (24 990 of 25 181) with 99.8% specificity and 93.5% sensitivity when examining 36 clinically relevant somatic single-nucleotide variants with a variant allele fraction of 10% or greater. The data also highlight an issue with artificial linearized plasmids as survey material for next-generation sequencing.
引用
收藏
页码:959 / 966
页数:8
相关论文
共 1 条
  • [1] Proficiency Testing of Standardized Samples Shows Very High Interlaboratory Agreement for Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Oncology Assays
    Merker, Jason D.
    Devereaux, Kelly
    Iafrate, A. John
    Kamel-Reid, Suzanne
    Kim, Annette S.
    Moncur, Joel T.
    Montgomery, Stephen B.
    Nagarajan, Rakesh
    Portier, Bryce P.
    Routbort, Mark J.
    Smail, Craig
    Surrey, Lea F.
    Vasalos, Patricia
    Lazar, Alexander J.
    Lindeman, Neal, I
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2019, 143 (04) : 463 - 471