How Do Blood Cancer Doctors Discuss Prognosis? Findings from a National Survey of Hematologic Oncologists

被引:19
|
作者
Habib, Anand R. [1 ,2 ]
Cronin, Angel M. [1 ]
Earle, Craig C. [3 ]
Tulsky, James A. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Mack, Jennifer W. [1 ,2 ]
Abel, Gregory A. [1 ,2 ]
Odejide, Oreofe O. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Div Populat Sci, Dept Med Oncol, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Ontario Inst Canc Res, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Psychosocial Oncol & Palliat Care, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Div Palliat Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
communication; hematologic neoplasms; prognosis; terminal care; OF-LIFE-CARE; PATIENT; COMMUNICATION; PHYSICIANS; PREFERENCES; UNCERTAINTY; DEATH; CHEMOTHERAPY; ASSOCIATIONS; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1089/jpm.2018.0441
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although blood cancers are accompanied by a high level of prognostic uncertainty, little is known about when and how hematologic oncologists discuss prognosis. Objectives: Characterize reported practices and predictors of prognostic discussions for a cohort of hematologic oncologists. Design: Cross-sectional mailed survey in 2015. Setting/Subjects: U.S.-based hematologic oncologists providing clinical care for adult patients with blood cancers. Measurements: We conducted univariable and multivariable analyses assessing the association of clinician characteristics with reported frequency of initiation of prognostic discussions, type of terminology used, and whether prognosis is readdressed. Results: We received 349 surveys (response rate = 57.3%). The majority of respondents (60.3%) reported conducting prognostic discussions with "most" (>95%) of their patients. More than half (56.8%) preferred general/qualitative rather than specific/numeric terms when discussing prognosis. Although 91.3% reported that they typically first initiate prognostic discussions at diagnosis, 17.7% reported routinely never readdressing prognosis or waiting until death is imminent to revisit the topic. Hematologic oncologists with <= 15 years since medical school graduation (odds ratio [OR] 0.51; confidence interval (95% CI) 0.30-0.88) and those who considered prognostic uncertainty a barrier to quality end-of-life care (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.35-0.90) had significantly lower odds of discussing prognosis with "most" patients. Conclusions: Although the majority of hematologic oncologists reported discussing prognosis with their patients, most prefer general/qualitative terms. Moreover, even though prognosis evolves during the disease course, nearly one in five reported never readdressing prognosis or only doing so near death. These findings suggest the need for structured interventions to improve prognostic communication for patients with blood cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 684
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How Well Do Medical Oncologists Manage Chronic Cancer Pain? A National Survey
    Breuer, Brenda
    Chang, Victor T.
    Von Roenn, Jamie H.
    von Gunten, Charles
    Neugut, Alfred I.
    Kaplan, Ronald
    Wallenstein, Sylvan
    Portenoy, Russell K.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2015, 20 (02): : 202 - 209
  • [2] Timeliness of End-of-Life Discussions for Blood Cancers: A National Survey of Hematologic Oncologists
    Odejide, Oreofe O.
    Cronin, Angel M.
    Condron, Nolan
    Earle, Craig C.
    Wolfe, Joanne
    Abel, Gregory A.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 176 (02) : 263 - 265
  • [3] Measuring Quality of End-of-Life Care for Blood Cancers: A National Survey of Hematologic Oncologists
    Odejide, Oreofe O.
    Cronin, Angel M.
    Condron, Nolan B.
    Fletcher, Sean A.
    Earle, Craig
    Abel, Gregory A.
    BLOOD, 2015, 126 (23)
  • [4] How do cancer physicians say they discuss prognosis with their terminally-ill patients? - A survey of ASCO members.
    Daugherty, CK
    Hlubocky, FJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (16) : 730S - 730S
  • [5] Prognosis, treatment benefit, and goals of care: what do oncologists discuss with patients who have terminal cancer?
    Raskin, William
    Harle, Ingrid
    Hopman, Wilma M.
    Booth, Christopher M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [6] Prognosis, Treatment Benefit and Goals of Care: What do Oncologists Discuss with Patients who have Incurable Cancer?
    Raskin, W.
    Harle, I.
    Hopman, W. M.
    Booth, C. M.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (03) : 209 - 214
  • [7] Does prognostic uncertainty affect discussions of prognosis? Lessons from a survey of hematologic oncologists.
    Odejide, Oreofe Olukemi
    Cronin, Angel M.
    Earle, Craig
    Mack, Jennifer W.
    Tulsky, James A.
    Abel, Gregory A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (31)
  • [8] How do doctors choose treatment for older gynecological cancer patients? A Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group survey of gynecologic oncologists
    Makoto Yamamoto
    Yoshio Yoshida
    Yoshio Itani
    Shinya Sato
    Masayuki Futagami
    Hitomi Sakai
    Hiroaki Kajiyama
    Masaki Fujimura
    Yoichi Aoki
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2020, 25 : 741 - 745
  • [9] How do doctors choose treatment for older gynecological cancer patients? A Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group survey of gynecologic oncologists
    Yamamoto, Makoto
    Yoshida, Yoshio
    Itani, Yoshio
    Sato, Shinya
    Futagami, Masayuki
    Sakai, Hitomi
    Kajiyama, Hiroaki
    Ura, Masaki Fujim
    Aoki, Yoichi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 25 (04) : 741 - 745
  • [10] Timeliness of end-of-life (EOL) discussions for blood cancers: A national survey of hematologic oncologists.
    Odejide, Oreofe Olukemi
    Cronin, Angel
    Condron, Nolan
    Earle, Craig
    Wolfe, Joanne
    Abel, Gregory Alan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (29)