A Bayesian framework for emergent constraints: case studies of climate sensitivity with PMIP

被引:18
|
作者
Renoult, Martin [1 ]
Annan, James Douglas [2 ]
Hargreaves, Julia Catherine [2 ]
Sagoo, Navjit [1 ]
Flynn, Clare [1 ]
Kapsch, Marie-Luise [3 ]
Li, Qiang [4 ]
Lohmann, Gerrit [5 ]
Mikolajewicz, Uwe [3 ]
Ohgaito, Rumi [6 ]
Shi, Xiaoxu [5 ]
Zhang, Qiong [4 ]
Mauritsen, Thorsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Bolin Ctr Climate Res, Dept Meteorol, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Blue Skies Res Ltd, Settle, England
[3] Max Planck Inst Meteorol, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Stockholm Univ, Bolin Ctr Climate Res, Dept Phys Geog, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Helmholtz Ctr Polar & Marine Res, Alfred Wegener Inst, Bremerhaven, Germany
[6] Japan Agcy Marine Earth Sci & Technol, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
EARTH SYSTEM MODEL; LAST GLACIAL MAXIMUM; SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES; EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGN; FUTURE; UNCERTAINTY; CMIP5;
D O I
10.5194/cp-16-1715-2020
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In this paper we introduce a Bayesian framework, which is explicit about prior assumptions, for using model ensembles and observations together to constrain future climate change. The emergent constraint approach has seen broad application in recent years, including studies constraining the equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) using the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and the mid-Pliocene Warm Period (mPWP). Most of these studies were based on ordinary least squares (OLS) fits between a variable of the climate state, such as tropical temperature, and climate sensitivity. Using our Bayesian method, and considering the LGM and mPWP separately, we obtain values of ECS of 2.7K (0.6-5.2, 5th-95th percentiles) using the PMIP2, PMIP3, and PMIP4 datasets for the LGM and 2.3K (0.5-4.4) with the PlioMIP1 and PlioMIP2 datasets for the mPWP. Restricting the ensembles to include only the most recent version of each model, we obtain 2.7K (0.7-5.2) using the LGM and 2.3K (0.4-4.5) using the mPWP. An advantage of the Bayesian framework is that it is possible to combine the two periods assuming they are independent, whereby we obtain a tighter constraint of 2.5K (0.8-4.0) using the restricted ensemble. We have explored the sensitivity to our assumptions in the method, including considering structural uncertainty, and in the choice of models, and this leads to 95% probability of climate sensitivity mostly below 5K and only exceeding 6K in a single and most uncertain case assuming a large structural uncertainty. The approach is compared with other approaches based on OLS, a Kalman filter method, and an alternative Bayesian method. An interesting implication of this work is that OLS-based emergent constraints on ECS generate tighter uncertainty estimates, in particular at the lower end, an artefact due to a flatter regression line in the case of lack of correlation. Although some fundamental challenges related to the use of emergent constraints remain, this paper provides a step towards a better foundation for their potential use in future probabilistic estimations of climate sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页码:1715 / 1735
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Emergent constraints on climate sensitivity
    Martin Rypdal
    Hege-Beate Fredriksen
    Kristoffer Rypdal
    Rebekka J. Steene
    Nature, 2018, 563 : E4 - E5
  • [2] On the Emergent Constraints of Climate Sensitivity
    Qu, Xin
    Hall, Alex
    DeAngelis, Anthony M.
    Zelinka, Mark D.
    Klein, Stephen A.
    Su, Hui
    Tian, Baijun
    Zhai, Chengxing
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2018, 31 (02) : 863 - 875
  • [3] Emergent constraints on climate sensitivity
    Rypdal, Martin
    Fredriksen, Hege-Beate
    Rypdal, Kristoffer
    Steene, Rebekka J.
    NATURE, 2018, 563 (7729) : E4 - E5
  • [4] Combining Emergent Constraints for Climate Sensitivity
    Bretherton, Christopher S.
    Caldwell, Peter M.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2020, 33 (17) : 7413 - 7430
  • [5] Evaluating Emergent Constraints on Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity
    Caldwell, Peter M.
    Zelinka, Mark D.
    Klein, Stephen A.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2018, 31 (10) : 3921 - 3942
  • [6] Emergent constraints on climate sensitivities
    Williamson, Mark S.
    Thackeray, Chad W.
    Cox, Peter M.
    Hall, Alex
    Huntingford, Chris
    Nijsse, Femke J. M. M.
    REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2021, 93 (02)
  • [7] Emergent Scale Invariance and Climate Sensitivity
    Rypdal, Martin
    Fredriksen, Hege-Beate
    Myrvoll-Nilsen, Eirik
    Rypdal, Kristoffer
    Sorbye, Sigrunn H.
    CLIMATE, 2018, 6 (04):
  • [8] Progressing emergent constraints on future climate change
    Hall, Alex
    Cox, Peter
    Huntingford, Chris
    Klein, Stephen
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2019, 9 (04) : 269 - 278
  • [9] Progressing emergent constraints on future climate change
    Alex Hall
    Peter Cox
    Chris Huntingford
    Stephen Klein
    Nature Climate Change, 2019, 9 : 269 - 278
  • [10] A Test of Emergent Constraints on Cloud Feedback and Climate Sensitivity Using a Calibrated Single-Model Ensemble
    Wagman, Benjamin M.
    Jackson, Charles S.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2018, 31 (18) : 7515 - 7532