Neuromuscular response of the trunk to sudden gait disturbances: Forward vs. backward perturbation

被引:15
|
作者
Mueller, Juliane [1 ]
Engel, Tilman [1 ]
Mueller, Steffen [1 ]
Kopinski, Stephan [1 ]
Baur, Heiner [2 ]
Mayer, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Univ Outpatient Clin, Sports Med & Sports Orthopaed, Potsdam, Germany
[2] Bern Univ Appl Sci, Hlth, Physiotherapy, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Stumbling; Gait perturbation; EMG; Core; MiSpEx*; MUSCLE RESPONSE; KINEMATICS; WALKING; LOAD; STRATEGIES; RECOVERY; FORCES; ONSET; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.07.005
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The study aimed to analyse neuromuscular activity of the trunk comparing four different perturbations during gait. Thirteen subjects (28 +/- 3 yrs) walked (1 m/s) on a split-belt treadmill, while 4 (belt) perturbations (F1, F2, B1, B2) were randomly applied. Perturbations differed, related to treadmill belt translation, in direction (forward (F)/backward (B)) and amplitude (20 m/s(2) (1)/40 m/s(2) (2)). Trunk muscle activity was assessed with a 12-lead-EMG. EMG-RMS [%] (0-200 ms after perturbation; normalized to RMS of normal gait) was analyzed for muscles and four trunk areas (ventral left/right; dorsal left/right). Ratio of ventral: dorsal muscles were calculated. Muscle onset [ms] was determined. Data analysis was conducted descriptively, followed by ANOVA (post hoc Tukey-Kramer (alpha = 0.05)). All perturbations lead to an increase in EMG-RMS (428 +/- 289%). F1 showed the lowest and F2 the highest increase for the flexors. B2 showed the highest increase for the extensors. Significant differences between perturbations could be observed for 6 muscles, as well as the 4 trunk areas. Ratio analysis revealed no significant differences (range 1.25 (B1) to 1.71 (F2) between stimuli. Muscle response time (ventral: 87.0 +/- 21.7 ms; dorsal: 88.4 +/- 17.0 ms) between stimuli was only significant (p = 0.005) for the dorsal muscles. Magnitude significantly influences neuromuscular trunk response patterns in healthy adults. Regardless of direction ventral muscles always revealed higher relative increase of activity while compensating the walking perturbations. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 176
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Backward vs. Forward Gait Symmetry Analysis Based on Plantar Pressure Mapping
    Daniluk, Anna
    Hadamus, Anna
    Ludwicki, Michal
    Zagrodny, Bartlomiej
    [J]. SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2022, 14 (02):
  • [2] MODEL FOR NEUROMUSCULAR RESPONSE TO SUDDEN DISTURBANCES
    MAINS, RE
    SOECHTIN.JF
    [J]. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1972, 94 (02) : 49 - &
  • [3] Driver brake vs. steer response to sudden forward collision scenario in manual and automated driving modes
    Blommer, Mike
    Curry, Reates
    Swaminathan, Radhakrishnan
    Tijerina, Louis
    Talamonti, Walter
    Kochhar, Dev
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2017, 45 : 93 - 101
  • [4] Trunk active response and spinal forces in sudden forward loading - analysis of the role of perturbation load and pre-perturbation conditions by a kinematics-driven model
    Shahvarpour, Ali
    Shirazi-Adl, Aboulfazl
    Lariviere, Christian
    Bazrgari, Babak
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2015, 48 (01) : 44 - 52
  • [5] Sudden gait perturbations elicit sex-specific neuromuscular trunk responses in persons with low back pain
    Mueller, Juliane
    Martinez-Valdes, Eduardo
    Mueller, Steffen
    Kulig, Kornelia
    Mayer, Frank
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2020, 102
  • [6] Trunk response to sudden forward perturbations - Effects of preload and sudden load magnitudes, posture and abdominal antagonistic activation
    Shahvarpour, Ali
    Shirazi-Adl, Aboulfazl
    Mecheri, Hakim
    Lariviere, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (03) : 394 - 403
  • [7] The variability of the trunk forward bending in standing activities during work vs. leisure time
    Villumsen, Morten
    Madeleine, Pascal
    Jorgensen, Marie Birk
    Holtermann, Andreas
    Samani, Afshin
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2017, 58 : 273 - 280
  • [8] An Experiment on Forward vs. Backward Induction: How Fairness and Level k Reasoning Matter
    Balkenborg, Dieter
    Nagel, Rosemarie
    [J]. GERMAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 17 (03) : 378 - 408
  • [9] False recognition in DRM lists with three critical words: Forward vs. Backward association
    Cadavid, Sara
    Soledad Beato, Maria
    Fernandez, Angel
    [J]. PSICOLOGICA, 2012, 33 (01): : 39 - 58
  • [10] Neuromuscular response of the trunk to inertial based sudden perturbations following whole body vibration exposure
    MacIntyre, Danielle
    Cort, Joel A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (06) : 977 - 985